Psychological factors in personal and clinical recovery in bipolar disorder.

bipolar disorder clinical recovery coping personal recovery psychological factors

Journal

Journal of affective disorders
ISSN: 1573-2517
Titre abrégé: J Affect Disord
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 7906073

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 02 2021
Historique:
received: 04 02 2020
revised: 18 09 2020
accepted: 07 11 2020
pubmed: 23 11 2020
medline: 21 4 2021
entrez: 22 11 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Research into bipolar disorder (BD) has primarily focused upon clinical recovery (CR), i.e. symptom reduction, and overlooked personally meaningful recovery outcomes emphasized by service users. Personal recovery (PR) has been a major focus in the formulation of mental health policies and guidelines, and yet, research into factors influencing PR in BD is in its infancy. This study compared psychological associates of concurrent PR and CR, and determined psychological factors in PR prospectively at 6 months. 107 participants completed baseline assessments, of whom 84% completed follow-up at 6 months. Controlling for potential confounders, multiple linear and ordinal regression models showed that some psychological factors underpinned both CR and PR at baseline: worse PR and CR outcomes were associated with higher negative self-dispositional appraisals and dysfunctional attitudes. Better PR, but worse CR ([hypo]mania related) were associated with higher adaptive coping. Additionally, better PR (but not CR) was associated with higher concurrent risk taking at baseline and predicted at follow-up by higher levels of baseline rumination. Better CR ([hypo]mania related), but not PR, was associated with lower impulsivity, but higher BAS processes. Psychological and clinical factors were not measured at follow up and may have changed over time. Participants were a convenience sample. Understanding psychological factors driving recovery in BD is essential for refining the conceptual framework of PR, and informing psychological models and related interventions for BD. The identified differences in psychological factors highlight the importance of more individualised, PR focused therapeutic approaches.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Research into bipolar disorder (BD) has primarily focused upon clinical recovery (CR), i.e. symptom reduction, and overlooked personally meaningful recovery outcomes emphasized by service users. Personal recovery (PR) has been a major focus in the formulation of mental health policies and guidelines, and yet, research into factors influencing PR in BD is in its infancy.
METHODS
This study compared psychological associates of concurrent PR and CR, and determined psychological factors in PR prospectively at 6 months.
RESULTS
107 participants completed baseline assessments, of whom 84% completed follow-up at 6 months. Controlling for potential confounders, multiple linear and ordinal regression models showed that some psychological factors underpinned both CR and PR at baseline: worse PR and CR outcomes were associated with higher negative self-dispositional appraisals and dysfunctional attitudes. Better PR, but worse CR ([hypo]mania related) were associated with higher adaptive coping. Additionally, better PR (but not CR) was associated with higher concurrent risk taking at baseline and predicted at follow-up by higher levels of baseline rumination. Better CR ([hypo]mania related), but not PR, was associated with lower impulsivity, but higher BAS processes.
LIMITATIONS
Psychological and clinical factors were not measured at follow up and may have changed over time. Participants were a convenience sample.
CONCLUSIONS
Understanding psychological factors driving recovery in BD is essential for refining the conceptual framework of PR, and informing psychological models and related interventions for BD. The identified differences in psychological factors highlight the importance of more individualised, PR focused therapeutic approaches.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33221719
pii: S0165-0327(20)32974-8
doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.11.044
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

326-337

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Auteurs

Barbara Mezes (B)

Spectrum Centre for Mental Health Research, Division of Health Research, Lancaster University, Bailrigg, Lancaster LA1 4YW, United Kingdom;. Electronic address: b.mezes@brighton.ac.uk.

Fiona Lobban (F)

Spectrum Centre for Mental Health Research, Division of Health Research, Lancaster University, Bailrigg, Lancaster LA1 4YW, United Kingdom.

Deborah Costain (D)

Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Lancaster University, Bailrigg, Lancaster LA1 4YW, United Kingdom.

Damien Longson (D)

Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Bury New Road, Prestwich, Manchester M25 3BL, United Kingdom.

Steven H Jones (SH)

Spectrum Centre for Mental Health Research, Division of Health Research, Lancaster University, Bailrigg, Lancaster LA1 4YW, United Kingdom.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH