Short-term results of surgical treatment of acetabular fractures using the modified Stoppa approach.
Acetabular fractures
Acetabulum
Anterior column
Modified stoppa approach
Journal
Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma
ISSN: 0976-5662
Titre abrégé: J Clin Orthop Trauma
Pays: India
ID NLM: 101559469
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
received:
25
07
2020
revised:
07
10
2020
accepted:
07
10
2020
entrez:
16
11
2020
pubmed:
17
11
2020
medline:
17
11
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
As the more commonly used ilioinguinal approach is extensive and associated with complications arising from the dissection along the inguinal canal, we attempt to evaluate the efficacy of the modified Stoppa approach as an alternative in the operative management of acetabular fractures. Twenty-three patients with acetabular fractures, were operated by the modified Stoppa approach. Fractures were classified; operative time and blood loss were recorded; the radiological and clinical outcomes were prospectively analysed. We analysed the radiological results according to the criteria of Matta and the clinical results by the Merle d'Aubigne and Postel score with a mean follow up of 15.13 months. The clinical outcomes were excellent or good in nineteen cases, fair and poor in two patients each. In eighteen of our cases the reduction was anatomic, imperfect in two cases, and poor in three cases. The mean pre-operative displacements on axial, sagittal and coronal NCCT sections were 3.8, 3.1 and 3.6 mm, respectively; and mean post-operative displacements were 0.2, 0.3 and 0.2 mm, respectively. The mean pre-operative and post-operative fracture gap were 12.8 mm and 1.1 mm respectively. Minimizing perioperative morbidity and simultaneously allowing access for anatomical reduction are the major benefits of the approach. The modified Stoppa approach can substitute the ilioinguinal approach for the surgical fixation of acetabular fractures.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
As the more commonly used ilioinguinal approach is extensive and associated with complications arising from the dissection along the inguinal canal, we attempt to evaluate the efficacy of the modified Stoppa approach as an alternative in the operative management of acetabular fractures.
METHODS
METHODS
Twenty-three patients with acetabular fractures, were operated by the modified Stoppa approach. Fractures were classified; operative time and blood loss were recorded; the radiological and clinical outcomes were prospectively analysed. We analysed the radiological results according to the criteria of Matta and the clinical results by the Merle d'Aubigne and Postel score with a mean follow up of 15.13 months.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The clinical outcomes were excellent or good in nineteen cases, fair and poor in two patients each. In eighteen of our cases the reduction was anatomic, imperfect in two cases, and poor in three cases. The mean pre-operative displacements on axial, sagittal and coronal NCCT sections were 3.8, 3.1 and 3.6 mm, respectively; and mean post-operative displacements were 0.2, 0.3 and 0.2 mm, respectively. The mean pre-operative and post-operative fracture gap were 12.8 mm and 1.1 mm respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Minimizing perioperative morbidity and simultaneously allowing access for anatomical reduction are the major benefits of the approach. The modified Stoppa approach can substitute the ilioinguinal approach for the surgical fixation of acetabular fractures.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33192018
doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2020.10.007
pii: S0976-5662(20)30476-8
pmc: PMC7656521
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1121-1127Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Informations de copyright
© 2020.
Références
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996 Nov;78(11):1632-45
pubmed: 8934477
Injury. 2020 Apr;51(4):984-990
pubmed: 32113739
J Orthop Trauma. 2010 May;24(5):271-8
pubmed: 20418731
JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2018 Jun 27;8(2):e19
pubmed: 30233991
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2012 Oct;25(10):810-2
pubmed: 23342793
Orthopedics. 2013 Oct 1;36(10):e1307-15
pubmed: 24093709
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1954 Jun;36-A(3):451-75
pubmed: 13163078
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005 Jan;87(1):2-9
pubmed: 15686228
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994 Aug;(305):112-23
pubmed: 8050220
Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2012 Sep;24(4-5):439-48
pubmed: 22971850
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2014 Oct;100(6):675-80
pubmed: 25161073
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2019 Jan;53(1):6-14
pubmed: 30558866
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2011 Mar;19(3):170-5
pubmed: 21368098
J Orthop Trauma. 2010 May;24(5):263-70
pubmed: 20418730
J Orthop Trauma. 2014 Jun;28(6):313-9
pubmed: 24100918
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Nov;472(11):3345-52
pubmed: 24420164
Clin Anat. 2007 May;20(4):433-9
pubmed: 16944498
J Orthop Trauma. 2006 Jan;20(1 Suppl):S20-9
pubmed: 16385203
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993 Jul;(292):62-76
pubmed: 8519138
Injury. 2007 Apr;38(4):431-41
pubmed: 17445529
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986 Apr;(205):230-40
pubmed: 3698382
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986 Apr;(205):241-50
pubmed: 3698383
Unfallchirurg. 2013 Mar;116(3):213-20
pubmed: 23478898
J Trauma. 2011 Nov;71(5):1340-4
pubmed: 21768909