Capacity limitations of processing presuppositions triggered by determiners.
Dual-task
Experimental pragmatics
PRP
Presuppositions
Journal
Acta psychologica
ISSN: 1873-6297
Titre abrégé: Acta Psychol (Amst)
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 0370366
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2020
Nov 2020
Historique:
received:
18
02
2020
revised:
08
06
2020
accepted:
24
07
2020
pubmed:
13
11
2020
medline:
15
12
2020
entrez:
12
11
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Definite determiners trigger existence- and uniqueness-presuppositions, that is, the speaker assumes that it is taken for granted that there exists exactly one of the mentioned object in the relevant discourse. Indefinite determiners are associated with anti-uniqueness, that is, that there are several of the mentioned object. Applying the Maximize Presupposition principle, this additional meaning component arises as an anti-presupposition and involves first considering the definite determiner's uniqueness-presupposition and then its negation. We here investigate processing of the two determiners in more detail and ask whether this processing is automatic or requires limited central capacities. To do so, we employed the Psychological Refractory Period (PRP) approach and the locus of slack-logic. We observed more difficult processing for the indefinite compared to the definite determiner in felicitous sentences, and also in infelicitous compared to felicitous sentences. Further, immediate processing of the indefinite determiner appears capacity-limited. These results support the Maximize Presupposition principle and are an important step forward toward understanding cognitive processing of presuppositions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33181443
pii: S0001-6918(20)30117-7
doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103159
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
103159Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.