Guidelines for Modeling and Reporting Health Effects of Climate Change Mitigation Actions.
Journal
Environmental health perspectives
ISSN: 1552-9924
Titre abrégé: Environ Health Perspect
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0330411
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2020
11 2020
Historique:
entrez:
10
11
2020
pubmed:
11
11
2020
medline:
30
1
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Modeling suggests that climate change mitigation actions can have substantial human health benefits that accrue quickly and locally. Documenting the benefits can help drive more ambitious and health-protective climate change mitigation actions; however, documenting the adverse health effects can help to avoid them. Estimating the health effects of mitigation (HEM) actions can help policy makers prioritize investments based not only on mitigation potential but also on expected health benefits. To date, however, the wide range of incompatible approaches taken to developing and reporting HEM estimates has limited their comparability and usefulness to policymakers. The objective of this effort was to generate guidance for modeling studies on scoping, estimating, and reporting population health effects from climate change mitigation actions. An expert panel of HEM researchers was recruited to participate in developing guidance for conducting HEM studies. The primary literature and a synthesis of HEM studies were provided to the panel. Panel members then participated in a modified Delphi exercise to identify areas of consensus regarding HEM estimation. Finally, the panel met to review and discuss consensus findings, resolve remaining differences, and generate guidance regarding conducting HEM studies. The panel generated a checklist of recommendations regarding stakeholder engagement: HEM modeling, including model structure, scope and scale, demographics, time horizons, counterfactuals, health response functions, and metrics; parameterization and reporting; approaches to uncertainty and sensitivity analysis; accounting for policy uptake; and discounting. This checklist provides guidance for conducting and reporting HEM estimates to make them more comparable and useful for policymakers. Harmonization of HEM estimates has the potential to lead to advances in and improved synthesis of policy-relevant research that can inform evidence-based decision making and practice. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP6745.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Modeling suggests that climate change mitigation actions can have substantial human health benefits that accrue quickly and locally. Documenting the benefits can help drive more ambitious and health-protective climate change mitigation actions; however, documenting the adverse health effects can help to avoid them. Estimating the health effects of mitigation (HEM) actions can help policy makers prioritize investments based not only on mitigation potential but also on expected health benefits. To date, however, the wide range of incompatible approaches taken to developing and reporting HEM estimates has limited their comparability and usefulness to policymakers.
OBJECTIVE
The objective of this effort was to generate guidance for modeling studies on scoping, estimating, and reporting population health effects from climate change mitigation actions.
METHODS
An expert panel of HEM researchers was recruited to participate in developing guidance for conducting HEM studies. The primary literature and a synthesis of HEM studies were provided to the panel. Panel members then participated in a modified Delphi exercise to identify areas of consensus regarding HEM estimation. Finally, the panel met to review and discuss consensus findings, resolve remaining differences, and generate guidance regarding conducting HEM studies.
RESULTS
The panel generated a checklist of recommendations regarding stakeholder engagement: HEM modeling, including model structure, scope and scale, demographics, time horizons, counterfactuals, health response functions, and metrics; parameterization and reporting; approaches to uncertainty and sensitivity analysis; accounting for policy uptake; and discounting.
DISCUSSION
This checklist provides guidance for conducting and reporting HEM estimates to make them more comparable and useful for policymakers. Harmonization of HEM estimates has the potential to lead to advances in and improved synthesis of policy-relevant research that can inform evidence-based decision making and practice. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP6745.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33170741
doi: 10.1289/EHP6745
pmc: PMC7654632
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Comment
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
115001Subventions
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : World Health Organization
ID : 001
Pays : International
Organisme : NIEHS NIH HHS
ID : P30 ES009089
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIEHS NIH HHS
ID : P30 ES010126
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentOn
Type : CommentIn
Références
PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097
pubmed: 19621072
Sci Total Environ. 2011 Sep 1;409(19):3578-94
pubmed: 21764422
PLoS Med. 2016 Jun 28;13(6):e1002056
pubmed: 27351744
Lancet Planet Health. 2018 Mar;2(3):e126-e133
pubmed: 29615227
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Apr 04;15(4):
pubmed: 29617317
Clim Change. 2020 Aug 23;:1-19
pubmed: 32863481
PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e20476
pubmed: 21694759
Health Res Policy Syst. 2017 Apr 26;15(1):35
pubmed: 28446185
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Dec 21;15(1):
pubmed: 29267204
Annu Rev Public Health. 2008;29:11-25
pubmed: 18173381
Environ Health Perspect. 2009 Jun;117(6):857-62
pubmed: 19590674
Environ Int. 2006 Dec;32(8):1072-93
pubmed: 16905190
Nature. 2010 Feb 11;463(7282):747-56
pubmed: 20148028
Ann Glob Health. 2019 Dec 16;85(1):140
pubmed: 31871903
BMJ. 2000 May 20;320(7246):1395-8
pubmed: 10818037
Risk Anal. 2004 Jun;24(3):635-50
pubmed: 15209935
Ann Intern Med. 2007 Oct 16;147(8):573-7
pubmed: 17938396
Curr Environ Health Rep. 2017 Dec;4(4):504-513
pubmed: 29080073
Glob Environ Change. 2017 Jan;42:181-192
pubmed: 28239237
Environ Health Perspect. 2014 May;122(5):447-55
pubmed: 24583270
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Jun 15;627:388-402
pubmed: 29426161
Lancet. 2009 Dec 19;374(9707):2104-2114
pubmed: 19942281
Pharmacoeconomics. 2015 Feb;33(2):105-21
pubmed: 25336432
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012 Nov 07;12:168
pubmed: 23134698