Instagram as a Window to Societal Perspective on Mental Health, Gender, and Race: Observational Pilot Study.
Instagram
depression
gender
mental health
race
social media
stigma
Journal
JMIR mental health
ISSN: 2368-7959
Titre abrégé: JMIR Ment Health
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101658926
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 Oct 2020
27 Oct 2020
Historique:
received:
19
04
2020
accepted:
12
09
2020
revised:
31
07
2020
entrez:
27
10
2020
pubmed:
28
10
2020
medline:
28
10
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Gender and race are known to impact attitudes toward mental health topics and help-seeking behavior. Men and minorities are more likely to cite stigma as a reason for not seeking help for mental health concerns, which is of particular relevance given the high rate of suicide in men and challenges of historic proportion currently facing minority communities. Instagram provides a platform to discuss mental health, though a lack of male and minority representation may further alienate these populations. We aimed to investigate whether men and nonwhite individuals are underrepresented in Instagram photos tagged with #mentalhealth (compared to photos tagged with #health) to better understand how gender and race-based representations are manifested on this popular social media platform and discuss the implications. Three investigators of different genders and racial backgrounds met on nine different days via teleconference to analyze a total of 215 publicly available Instagram photos tagged with #mentalhealth and 215 with #health. These photos were generated using Instagram's search function, and search results were sorted by most recently published at the time of data collection. For each photo, the three investigators recorded their observations about the gender (male versus female) and race (white versus nonwhite versus racially unclassifiable) of subjects featured in the photo, which they did not discuss with other investigators. Chi-squared analysis was performed on each investigator's data set to compare the frequency of male versus female and white versus nonwhite subjects identified in each hashtag category. Kappa interrater agreement was calculated for each investigator pair, category (gender or race), and hashtag. All three investigators observed significantly more female as compared to male subjects in photos tagged with #mentalhealth (X Women are featured more frequently than men in Instagram photos tagged with #mentalhealth. The topic of #health, meanwhile, is not gendered this way. Low visibility of mental health among men may both represent and exacerbate existing stigma and barriers to care. White subjects are featured significantly more frequently than nonwhite subjects in photos tagged with both #mentalhealth and #health. Directed interventions using the Instagram platform may be indicated to increase the visibility of underrepresented groups and break the cycle of stigma.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Gender and race are known to impact attitudes toward mental health topics and help-seeking behavior. Men and minorities are more likely to cite stigma as a reason for not seeking help for mental health concerns, which is of particular relevance given the high rate of suicide in men and challenges of historic proportion currently facing minority communities. Instagram provides a platform to discuss mental health, though a lack of male and minority representation may further alienate these populations.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
We aimed to investigate whether men and nonwhite individuals are underrepresented in Instagram photos tagged with #mentalhealth (compared to photos tagged with #health) to better understand how gender and race-based representations are manifested on this popular social media platform and discuss the implications.
METHODS
METHODS
Three investigators of different genders and racial backgrounds met on nine different days via teleconference to analyze a total of 215 publicly available Instagram photos tagged with #mentalhealth and 215 with #health. These photos were generated using Instagram's search function, and search results were sorted by most recently published at the time of data collection. For each photo, the three investigators recorded their observations about the gender (male versus female) and race (white versus nonwhite versus racially unclassifiable) of subjects featured in the photo, which they did not discuss with other investigators. Chi-squared analysis was performed on each investigator's data set to compare the frequency of male versus female and white versus nonwhite subjects identified in each hashtag category. Kappa interrater agreement was calculated for each investigator pair, category (gender or race), and hashtag.
RESULTS
RESULTS
All three investigators observed significantly more female as compared to male subjects in photos tagged with #mentalhealth (X
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Women are featured more frequently than men in Instagram photos tagged with #mentalhealth. The topic of #health, meanwhile, is not gendered this way. Low visibility of mental health among men may both represent and exacerbate existing stigma and barriers to care. White subjects are featured significantly more frequently than nonwhite subjects in photos tagged with both #mentalhealth and #health. Directed interventions using the Instagram platform may be indicated to increase the visibility of underrepresented groups and break the cycle of stigma.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33107831
pii: v7i10e19171
doi: 10.2196/19171
pmc: PMC7655468
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e19171Informations de copyright
©Kierstin Utter, Eva Waineo, Capricia M Bell, Harrison L Quaal, Diane L Levine. Originally published in JMIR Mental Health (http://mental.jmir.org), 27.10.2020.
Références
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Mar 29;19(3):e95
pubmed: 28356239
J Health Soc Behav. 2008 Sep;49(3):317-34
pubmed: 18771066
AIDS Behav. 2020 Jul;24(7):2045-2053
pubmed: 31916098
Can J Psychiatry. 2018 Sep;63(9):581-589
pubmed: 29673270
Am J Mens Health. 2018 Jan;12(1):78-89
pubmed: 26864440
Sociol Health Illn. 2012 Mar;34(3):345-61
pubmed: 21707661
Front Psychol. 2020 Jan 22;10:2991
pubmed: 32038379
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2020 Jun;7(3):398-402
pubmed: 32306369
Sociol Health Illn. 2008 Jul;30(5):711-25
pubmed: 18564976
J Adolesc Health. 2018 Sep;63(3):348-356
pubmed: 30237000
J Health Psychol. 2019 Mar;24(3):376-385
pubmed: 27852889
J Health Soc Behav. 2018 Dec;59(4):466-485
pubmed: 30484715
J Health Psychol. 2018 Jul;23(8):1003-1011
pubmed: 27611630
Int J Prev Med. 2019 Oct 09;10:166
pubmed: 32133084
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018 Dec 13;6(12):e1958
pubmed: 30656096
Crisis. 2019 Jan;40(1):36-41
pubmed: 29932019
Tob Control. 2020 Nov;29(6):612-617
pubmed: 31266903
Couns Psychol. 2017 Aug;45(6):873-901
pubmed: 29217847