Low cost 3D printed clamps for external fixator for developing countries: a biomechanical study.
3D print
ASTM F1541
Biomechanical properties
Developing countries
Linear external fixation
Low cost
Third world
Journal
3D printing in medicine
ISSN: 2365-6271
Titre abrégé: 3D Print Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101721758
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
23 Oct 2020
23 Oct 2020
Historique:
received:
17
03
2020
accepted:
16
10
2020
entrez:
23
10
2020
pubmed:
24
10
2020
medline:
24
10
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
External fixation is a mainstream limb reconstruction technique, most often used after a traumatic injury. Due to the high rates of trauma in developing countries, external fixation devices are often utilized for immediate fracture stabilization and soft tissue repair. Proper external fixation treatment too often still fails to be adopted in these regions due to the high cost and trauma complexity. A novel, inexpensive, unilateral fixator was constructed using 3D printed clamps and other readily available supporting components. ASTM standard F1541 tests were used to assess the biomechanical properties of this novel external fixator. Applicable sections of ASTM standard F1541 were used to determine the biomechanical properties of the novel external fixator. 3D printed clamps modeled using SolidWorks and printed with chopped carbon fibers using a fuse deposition modeling (FDM) based 3D printer by Markforged (Boston, MA) were used. This study included 3 different testing configurations: axial compression, anterior-posterior (AP) bending, and medial-lateral (ML) bending. Using the novel unilateral fixator with 3D printed clamps previously sterilized by autoclave, an input load was applied at a rate of 20 N/s, starting at 0 N via a hydraulic MTS tester Model 359. Force and deformation data were collected at a sampling rate of 30 Hz. There was a load limit of 750 N, or until there was a maximum vertical deformation of 6 mm. Also, 4 key dimensions of the 3D printed clamps were measured pre and post autoclave: diameter, width, height and length. The novel external fixator had axial compression, AP and ML bending rigidities of 246.12 N/mm (σ = 8.87 N/mm), 35.98 N/mm (σ = 2.11 N/mm) and 39.60 N/mm (σ =2.60 N/mm), respectively. The 3D printed clamps shrunk unproportionally due to the autoclaving process, with the diameter, width, height and length dimensions shrinking by 2.6%, 0.2%, 1.7% and 0.3%, respectively. Overall, the biomechanical properties of the novel fixator with 3D printed clamps assessed in this study were comparable to external fixators that are currently being used in clinical settings. While the biomechanics were comparable, the low cost and readily available components of this design meets the need for low cost external fixators in developing countries that current clinical options could not satisfy. However, further verification and validation routines to determine efficacy and safety must be conducted before this novel fixator can be clinically deployed. Also, the material composition allowed for the clamps to maintain the appropriate shape with minimal dimensional shrinkage that can be accounted for in clamp design.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
External fixation is a mainstream limb reconstruction technique, most often used after a traumatic injury. Due to the high rates of trauma in developing countries, external fixation devices are often utilized for immediate fracture stabilization and soft tissue repair. Proper external fixation treatment too often still fails to be adopted in these regions due to the high cost and trauma complexity. A novel, inexpensive, unilateral fixator was constructed using 3D printed clamps and other readily available supporting components. ASTM standard F1541 tests were used to assess the biomechanical properties of this novel external fixator.
METHODS
METHODS
Applicable sections of ASTM standard F1541 were used to determine the biomechanical properties of the novel external fixator. 3D printed clamps modeled using SolidWorks and printed with chopped carbon fibers using a fuse deposition modeling (FDM) based 3D printer by Markforged (Boston, MA) were used. This study included 3 different testing configurations: axial compression, anterior-posterior (AP) bending, and medial-lateral (ML) bending. Using the novel unilateral fixator with 3D printed clamps previously sterilized by autoclave, an input load was applied at a rate of 20 N/s, starting at 0 N via a hydraulic MTS tester Model 359. Force and deformation data were collected at a sampling rate of 30 Hz. There was a load limit of 750 N, or until there was a maximum vertical deformation of 6 mm. Also, 4 key dimensions of the 3D printed clamps were measured pre and post autoclave: diameter, width, height and length.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The novel external fixator had axial compression, AP and ML bending rigidities of 246.12 N/mm (σ = 8.87 N/mm), 35.98 N/mm (σ = 2.11 N/mm) and 39.60 N/mm (σ =2.60 N/mm), respectively. The 3D printed clamps shrunk unproportionally due to the autoclaving process, with the diameter, width, height and length dimensions shrinking by 2.6%, 0.2%, 1.7% and 0.3%, respectively.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Overall, the biomechanical properties of the novel fixator with 3D printed clamps assessed in this study were comparable to external fixators that are currently being used in clinical settings. While the biomechanics were comparable, the low cost and readily available components of this design meets the need for low cost external fixators in developing countries that current clinical options could not satisfy. However, further verification and validation routines to determine efficacy and safety must be conducted before this novel fixator can be clinically deployed. Also, the material composition allowed for the clamps to maintain the appropriate shape with minimal dimensional shrinkage that can be accounted for in clamp design.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33095407
doi: 10.1186/s41205-020-00084-3
pii: 10.1186/s41205-020-00084-3
pmc: PMC7585230
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
31Références
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1994 May;76(3):389-94
pubmed: 8175839
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Aug;467(8):1964-71
pubmed: 19242768
Injury. 2011 Dec;42(12):1449-54
pubmed: 21703616
Injury. 2014 Oct;45(10):1611-3
pubmed: 24845407
SICOT J. 2015 Jul 21;1:19
pubmed: 27163075
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993 Aug;(293):28-36
pubmed: 8339493
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991 Jul;73(4):654-9
pubmed: 2071654
Niger J Med. 2006 Apr-Jun;15(2):115-8
pubmed: 16805164
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001 May;83(4):533-5
pubmed: 11380125
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2015 Jun;41(3):313-8
pubmed: 26037979
Injury. 1997 Jan;28(1):29-34
pubmed: 9196623
BMC Public Health. 2012 Jun 18;12:439
pubmed: 22709383
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2003 Jan-Feb;27(1):89-90
pubmed: 12549605
Med Biol Eng Comput. 1988 May;26(3):271-6
pubmed: 3255016
HSS J. 2007 Feb;3(1):13-29
pubmed: 18751766
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2015 Sep;8(3):276-89
pubmed: 26047781