Real-time PCR on skin biopsies for super-spreaders' detection in bovine besnoitiosis.
Animals
Antibodies, Protozoan
/ blood
Biopsy
Carrier State
/ parasitology
Cattle
/ parasitology
Cattle Diseases
/ diagnosis
Coccidiosis
/ diagnosis
DNA, Protozoan
Diagnostic Tests, Routine
/ methods
Pathology, Molecular
Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction
/ methods
Sarcocystidae
/ genetics
Serologic Tests
Skin
/ parasitology
Besnoitia besnoiti
Cattle
Control
Real-time PCR
Super-spreaders
Journal
Parasites & vectors
ISSN: 1756-3305
Titre abrégé: Parasit Vectors
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101462774
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 Oct 2020
22 Oct 2020
Historique:
received:
23
06
2020
accepted:
14
10
2020
entrez:
23
10
2020
pubmed:
24
10
2020
medline:
4
6
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Bovine besnoitiosis, an emerging disease in Europe that can be transmitted by vectors, is caused by the apicomplexan Besnoitia besnoiti. Bovine besnoitiosis is difficult to control due to the complexity of its diagnosis in the acute stage of the disease, poor treatment success and chronically asymptomatic cattle acting as parasite reservoirs. When serological prevalence is low, detection and specific culling of seropositive cattle is feasible; however, economic considerations preclude this approach when serological prevalence is high. The aims of this study were to evaluate the accuracy of detection of super-spreaders in highly infected herds and to test their selective elimination as a new control strategy for bovine besnoitiosis. Previous real-time PCR analyses performed on skin tissues from 160 asymptomatic animals sampled at slaughterhouses showed that the tail base was the best location to evaluate the dermal parasite DNA load. All seropositive animals (n = 518) from eight dairy or beef cattle farms facing a high serological prevalence of besnoitiosis were sampled at the tail base and their skin sample analysed by real-time PCR. A recommendation of rapid and selective culling of super-spreaders was formulated and provided to the cattle breeders. Subsequent serological monitoring of naïve animals was used to evaluate the interest of this control strategy over time. Among the 518 seropositive animals, a low proportion of individuals (14.5%) showed Cq values below 36, 17.8% had doubtful results (36 < Cq ≤ 40) and 67.8% had negative PCR results. These proportions were grossly similar on the eight farms, regardless of their production type (beef or dairy cattle), size, geographical location or history of besnoitiosis. Within two weeks of the biopsy, the rapid culling of super-spreaders was implemented on only three farms. The numbers of newly infected animals were lower on these farms compared to those where super-spreaders were maintained in the herd. Real-time PCR analyses performed on skin biopsies of seropositive cattle showed huge individual variabilities in parasite DNA load. The rapid culling of individuals considered as super-spreaders seems to be a new and encouraging strategy for bovine besnoitiosis control.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Bovine besnoitiosis, an emerging disease in Europe that can be transmitted by vectors, is caused by the apicomplexan Besnoitia besnoiti. Bovine besnoitiosis is difficult to control due to the complexity of its diagnosis in the acute stage of the disease, poor treatment success and chronically asymptomatic cattle acting as parasite reservoirs. When serological prevalence is low, detection and specific culling of seropositive cattle is feasible; however, economic considerations preclude this approach when serological prevalence is high. The aims of this study were to evaluate the accuracy of detection of super-spreaders in highly infected herds and to test their selective elimination as a new control strategy for bovine besnoitiosis.
METHODS
METHODS
Previous real-time PCR analyses performed on skin tissues from 160 asymptomatic animals sampled at slaughterhouses showed that the tail base was the best location to evaluate the dermal parasite DNA load. All seropositive animals (n = 518) from eight dairy or beef cattle farms facing a high serological prevalence of besnoitiosis were sampled at the tail base and their skin sample analysed by real-time PCR. A recommendation of rapid and selective culling of super-spreaders was formulated and provided to the cattle breeders. Subsequent serological monitoring of naïve animals was used to evaluate the interest of this control strategy over time.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Among the 518 seropositive animals, a low proportion of individuals (14.5%) showed Cq values below 36, 17.8% had doubtful results (36 < Cq ≤ 40) and 67.8% had negative PCR results. These proportions were grossly similar on the eight farms, regardless of their production type (beef or dairy cattle), size, geographical location or history of besnoitiosis. Within two weeks of the biopsy, the rapid culling of super-spreaders was implemented on only three farms. The numbers of newly infected animals were lower on these farms compared to those where super-spreaders were maintained in the herd.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Real-time PCR analyses performed on skin biopsies of seropositive cattle showed huge individual variabilities in parasite DNA load. The rapid culling of individuals considered as super-spreaders seems to be a new and encouraging strategy for bovine besnoitiosis control.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33092627
doi: 10.1186/s13071-020-04405-7
pii: 10.1186/s13071-020-04405-7
pmc: PMC7579852
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibodies, Protozoan
0
DNA, Protozoan
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
529Références
Vet Parasitol. 2010 Nov 24;174(1-2):30-6
pubmed: 20850933
Onderstepoort J Vet Res. 1968 Jun;35(1):3-137
pubmed: 4398385
Vet Pathol. 2015 May;52(3):476-88
pubmed: 25096291
Parasitology. 2017 Jun;144(7):851-868
pubmed: 28241894
Vet Parasitol. 2011 Jun 10;178(3-4):223-34
pubmed: 21310538
Parasitology. 2014 Sep;141(11):1419-35
pubmed: 24871877
Parasit Vectors. 2015 Sep 04;8:450
pubmed: 26338535
Transbound Emerg Dis. 2013 Feb;60(1):59-68
pubmed: 22429475
BMC Vet Res. 2015 Feb 14;11:35
pubmed: 25886463
Parasitol Res. 2019 Sep;118(9):2499-2507
pubmed: 31363921
Vet Parasitol. 2013 Oct 18;197(1-2):95-103
pubmed: 23680543
Parasitology. 2014 Sep;141(11):1406-17
pubmed: 24694568
Onderstepoort J Vet Res. 1970 Jun;37(2):105-26
pubmed: 5005082
Vet Parasitol. 2011 Apr 19;177(1-2):20-7
pubmed: 21185653
Vet Parasitol. 2011 Jun 10;178(3-4):208-16
pubmed: 21324596
Vet Parasitol. 2006 Nov 5;141(3-4):216-25
pubmed: 16822616
Med Vet Entomol. 2019 Jun;33(2):247-255
pubmed: 30666684
Onderstepoort J Vet Res. 1974 Mar;41(1):1-5
pubmed: 4213163
Int J Parasitol. 2007 Aug;37(10):1097-106
pubmed: 17517415
Parasitol Res. 2019 Dec;118(12):3459-3468
pubmed: 31659452
Parasit Vectors. 2018 Aug 13;11(1):466
pubmed: 30103803
Parasitol Res. 2014 Jun;113(6):2355-62
pubmed: 24802865
Vet Parasitol. 2016 Jan 30;216:101-7
pubmed: 26801602
Vet Parasitol. 2007 May 31;146(3-4):352-6
pubmed: 17418951
Parasitol Res. 2018 Dec;117(12):4027-4032
pubmed: 30324257