Circulating tumour DNA analysis to direct therapy in advanced breast cancer (plasmaMATCH): a multicentre, multicohort, phase 2a, platform trial.
Adult
Aged
Biomarkers, Tumor
/ genetics
Breast Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Circulating Tumor DNA
/ blood
Estrogen Receptor alpha
/ antagonists & inhibitors
Female
Fulvestrant
/ therapeutic use
Genotype
Humans
Middle Aged
Molecular Targeted Therapy
Mutation
PTEN Phosphohydrolase
/ genetics
Prospective Studies
Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-akt
/ antagonists & inhibitors
Pyrimidines
/ therapeutic use
Pyrroles
/ therapeutic use
Quinolines
/ therapeutic use
Receptor, ErbB-2
/ genetics
Receptors, Estrogen
/ antagonists & inhibitors
Treatment Outcome
Journal
The Lancet. Oncology
ISSN: 1474-5488
Titre abrégé: Lancet Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100957246
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2020
10 2020
Historique:
received:
24
04
2020
revised:
17
06
2020
accepted:
26
06
2020
pubmed:
14
9
2020
medline:
21
10
2020
entrez:
13
9
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) testing might provide a current assessment of the genomic profile of advanced cancer, without the need to repeat tumour biopsy. We aimed to assess the accuracy of ctDNA testing in advanced breast cancer and the ability of ctDNA testing to select patients for mutation-directed therapy. We did an open-label, multicohort, phase 2a, platform trial of ctDNA testing in 18 UK hospitals. Participants were women (aged ≥18 years) with histologically confirmed advanced breast cancer and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-2. Patients had completed at least one previous line of treatment for advanced breast cancer or relapsed within 12 months of neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients were recruited into four parallel treatment cohorts matched to mutations identified in ctDNA: cohort A comprised patients with ESR1 mutations (treated with intramuscular extended-dose fulvestrant 500 mg); cohort B comprised patients with HER2 mutations (treated with oral neratinib 240 mg, and if oestrogen receptor-positive with intramuscular standard-dose fulvestrant); cohort C comprised patients with AKT1 mutations and oestrogen receptor-positive cancer (treated with oral capivasertib 400 mg plus intramuscular standard-dose fulvestrant); and cohort D comprised patients with AKT1 mutations and oestrogen receptor-negative cancer or PTEN mutation (treated with oral capivasertib 480 mg). Each cohort had a primary endpoint of confirmed objective response rate. For cohort A, 13 or more responses among 78 evaluable patients were required to infer activity and three or more among 16 were required for cohorts B, C, and D. Recruitment to all cohorts is complete and long-term follow-up is ongoing. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03182634; the European Clinical Trials database, EudraCT2015-003735-36; and the ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN16945804. Between Dec 21, 2016, and April 26, 2019, 1051 patients registered for the study, with ctDNA results available for 1034 patients. Agreement between ctDNA digital PCR and targeted sequencing was 96-99% (n=800, kappa 0·89-0·93). Sensitivity of digital PCR ctDNA testing for mutations identified in tissue sequencing was 93% (95% CI 83-98) overall and 98% (87-100) with contemporaneous biopsies. In all cohorts, combined median follow-up was 14·4 months (IQR 7·0-23·7). Cohorts B and C met or exceeded the target number of responses, with five (25% [95% CI 9-49]) of 20 patients in cohort B and four (22% [6-48]) of 18 patients in cohort C having a response. Cohorts A and D did not reach the target number of responses, with six (8% [95% CI 3-17]) of 74 in cohort A and two (11% [1-33]) of 19 patients in cohort D having a response. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were raised gamma-glutamyltransferase (13 [16%] of 80 patients; cohort A); diarrhoea (four [25%] of 20; cohort B); fatigue (four [22%] of 18; cohort C); and rash (five [26%] of 19; cohort D). 17 serious adverse reactions occurred in 11 patients, and there was one treatment-related death caused by grade 4 dyspnoea (in cohort C). ctDNA testing offers accurate, rapid genotyping that enables the selection of mutation-directed therapies for patients with breast cancer, with sufficient clinical validity for adoption into routine clinical practice. Our results demonstrate clinically relevant activity of targeted therapies against rare HER2 and AKT1 mutations, confirming these mutations could be targetable for breast cancer treatment. Cancer Research UK, AstraZeneca, and Puma Biotechnology.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) testing might provide a current assessment of the genomic profile of advanced cancer, without the need to repeat tumour biopsy. We aimed to assess the accuracy of ctDNA testing in advanced breast cancer and the ability of ctDNA testing to select patients for mutation-directed therapy.
METHODS
We did an open-label, multicohort, phase 2a, platform trial of ctDNA testing in 18 UK hospitals. Participants were women (aged ≥18 years) with histologically confirmed advanced breast cancer and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-2. Patients had completed at least one previous line of treatment for advanced breast cancer or relapsed within 12 months of neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients were recruited into four parallel treatment cohorts matched to mutations identified in ctDNA: cohort A comprised patients with ESR1 mutations (treated with intramuscular extended-dose fulvestrant 500 mg); cohort B comprised patients with HER2 mutations (treated with oral neratinib 240 mg, and if oestrogen receptor-positive with intramuscular standard-dose fulvestrant); cohort C comprised patients with AKT1 mutations and oestrogen receptor-positive cancer (treated with oral capivasertib 400 mg plus intramuscular standard-dose fulvestrant); and cohort D comprised patients with AKT1 mutations and oestrogen receptor-negative cancer or PTEN mutation (treated with oral capivasertib 480 mg). Each cohort had a primary endpoint of confirmed objective response rate. For cohort A, 13 or more responses among 78 evaluable patients were required to infer activity and three or more among 16 were required for cohorts B, C, and D. Recruitment to all cohorts is complete and long-term follow-up is ongoing. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03182634; the European Clinical Trials database, EudraCT2015-003735-36; and the ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN16945804.
FINDINGS
Between Dec 21, 2016, and April 26, 2019, 1051 patients registered for the study, with ctDNA results available for 1034 patients. Agreement between ctDNA digital PCR and targeted sequencing was 96-99% (n=800, kappa 0·89-0·93). Sensitivity of digital PCR ctDNA testing for mutations identified in tissue sequencing was 93% (95% CI 83-98) overall and 98% (87-100) with contemporaneous biopsies. In all cohorts, combined median follow-up was 14·4 months (IQR 7·0-23·7). Cohorts B and C met or exceeded the target number of responses, with five (25% [95% CI 9-49]) of 20 patients in cohort B and four (22% [6-48]) of 18 patients in cohort C having a response. Cohorts A and D did not reach the target number of responses, with six (8% [95% CI 3-17]) of 74 in cohort A and two (11% [1-33]) of 19 patients in cohort D having a response. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were raised gamma-glutamyltransferase (13 [16%] of 80 patients; cohort A); diarrhoea (four [25%] of 20; cohort B); fatigue (four [22%] of 18; cohort C); and rash (five [26%] of 19; cohort D). 17 serious adverse reactions occurred in 11 patients, and there was one treatment-related death caused by grade 4 dyspnoea (in cohort C).
INTERPRETATION
ctDNA testing offers accurate, rapid genotyping that enables the selection of mutation-directed therapies for patients with breast cancer, with sufficient clinical validity for adoption into routine clinical practice. Our results demonstrate clinically relevant activity of targeted therapies against rare HER2 and AKT1 mutations, confirming these mutations could be targetable for breast cancer treatment.
FUNDING
Cancer Research UK, AstraZeneca, and Puma Biotechnology.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32919527
pii: S1470-2045(20)30444-7
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30444-7
pmc: PMC7599319
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biomarkers, Tumor
0
Circulating Tumor DNA
0
ESR1 protein, human
0
Estrogen Receptor alpha
0
Pyrimidines
0
Pyrroles
0
Quinolines
0
Receptors, Estrogen
0
Fulvestrant
22X328QOC4
ERBB2 protein, human
EC 2.7.10.1
Receptor, ErbB-2
EC 2.7.10.1
AKT1 protein, human
EC 2.7.11.1
Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-akt
EC 2.7.11.1
PTEN Phosphohydrolase
EC 3.1.3.67
PTEN protein, human
EC 3.1.3.67
neratinib
JJH94R3PWB
capivasertib
WFR23M21IE
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03182634']
Types de publication
Adaptive Clinical Trial
Clinical Trial, Phase II
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1296-1308Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Références
Nat Biotechnol. 2013 Nov;31(11):1023-31
pubmed: 24142049
N Engl J Med. 2013 Mar 28;368(13):1199-209
pubmed: 23484797
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Mar;15(3):267-74
pubmed: 24508104
Nature. 2019 May;569(7757):560-564
pubmed: 31118521
Lancet Oncol. 2020 Mar;21(3):345-357
pubmed: 32035020
Cancer Discov. 2019 Oct;9(10):1388-1405
pubmed: 31315834
Cancer Discov. 2017 Mar;7(3):277-287
pubmed: 27986707
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Nov;18(11):e638
pubmed: 29208392
Nature. 2018 Feb 8;554(7691):189-194
pubmed: 29420467
Cell Rep. 2019 May 28;27(9):2690-2708.e10
pubmed: 31141692
Cancer Cell. 2018 Sep 10;34(3):427-438.e6
pubmed: 30205045
N Engl J Med. 2019 May 16;380(20):1929-1940
pubmed: 31091374
Cancer Discov. 2018 Nov;8(11):1390-1403
pubmed: 30206110
Nat Genet. 2013 Dec;45(12):1439-45
pubmed: 24185512
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Jun 1;36(16):1631-1641
pubmed: 29504847
JAMA Oncol. 2018 Jun 1;4(6):868-870
pubmed: 29242909
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jul 10;35(20):2251-2259
pubmed: 28489509
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jul 16;373(3):209-19
pubmed: 26030518
Lancet Oncol. 2013 Sep;14(10):989-98
pubmed: 23902874
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Feb 10;38(5):423-433
pubmed: 31841354
Clin Cancer Res. 2020 Feb 1;26(3):608-622
pubmed: 31591187
Nat Genet. 2019 Feb;51(2):207-216
pubmed: 30531871
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Oct;18(10):1360-1372
pubmed: 28800861