Circulating tumour DNA analysis to direct therapy in advanced breast cancer (plasmaMATCH): a multicentre, multicohort, phase 2a, platform trial.


Journal

The Lancet. Oncology
ISSN: 1474-5488
Titre abrégé: Lancet Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100957246

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 2020
Historique:
received: 24 04 2020
revised: 17 06 2020
accepted: 26 06 2020
pubmed: 14 9 2020
medline: 21 10 2020
entrez: 13 9 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) testing might provide a current assessment of the genomic profile of advanced cancer, without the need to repeat tumour biopsy. We aimed to assess the accuracy of ctDNA testing in advanced breast cancer and the ability of ctDNA testing to select patients for mutation-directed therapy. We did an open-label, multicohort, phase 2a, platform trial of ctDNA testing in 18 UK hospitals. Participants were women (aged ≥18 years) with histologically confirmed advanced breast cancer and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-2. Patients had completed at least one previous line of treatment for advanced breast cancer or relapsed within 12 months of neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients were recruited into four parallel treatment cohorts matched to mutations identified in ctDNA: cohort A comprised patients with ESR1 mutations (treated with intramuscular extended-dose fulvestrant 500 mg); cohort B comprised patients with HER2 mutations (treated with oral neratinib 240 mg, and if oestrogen receptor-positive with intramuscular standard-dose fulvestrant); cohort C comprised patients with AKT1 mutations and oestrogen receptor-positive cancer (treated with oral capivasertib 400 mg plus intramuscular standard-dose fulvestrant); and cohort D comprised patients with AKT1 mutations and oestrogen receptor-negative cancer or PTEN mutation (treated with oral capivasertib 480 mg). Each cohort had a primary endpoint of confirmed objective response rate. For cohort A, 13 or more responses among 78 evaluable patients were required to infer activity and three or more among 16 were required for cohorts B, C, and D. Recruitment to all cohorts is complete and long-term follow-up is ongoing. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03182634; the European Clinical Trials database, EudraCT2015-003735-36; and the ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN16945804. Between Dec 21, 2016, and April 26, 2019, 1051 patients registered for the study, with ctDNA results available for 1034 patients. Agreement between ctDNA digital PCR and targeted sequencing was 96-99% (n=800, kappa 0·89-0·93). Sensitivity of digital PCR ctDNA testing for mutations identified in tissue sequencing was 93% (95% CI 83-98) overall and 98% (87-100) with contemporaneous biopsies. In all cohorts, combined median follow-up was 14·4 months (IQR 7·0-23·7). Cohorts B and C met or exceeded the target number of responses, with five (25% [95% CI 9-49]) of 20 patients in cohort B and four (22% [6-48]) of 18 patients in cohort C having a response. Cohorts A and D did not reach the target number of responses, with six (8% [95% CI 3-17]) of 74 in cohort A and two (11% [1-33]) of 19 patients in cohort D having a response. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were raised gamma-glutamyltransferase (13 [16%] of 80 patients; cohort A); diarrhoea (four [25%] of 20; cohort B); fatigue (four [22%] of 18; cohort C); and rash (five [26%] of 19; cohort D). 17 serious adverse reactions occurred in 11 patients, and there was one treatment-related death caused by grade 4 dyspnoea (in cohort C). ctDNA testing offers accurate, rapid genotyping that enables the selection of mutation-directed therapies for patients with breast cancer, with sufficient clinical validity for adoption into routine clinical practice. Our results demonstrate clinically relevant activity of targeted therapies against rare HER2 and AKT1 mutations, confirming these mutations could be targetable for breast cancer treatment. Cancer Research UK, AstraZeneca, and Puma Biotechnology.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) testing might provide a current assessment of the genomic profile of advanced cancer, without the need to repeat tumour biopsy. We aimed to assess the accuracy of ctDNA testing in advanced breast cancer and the ability of ctDNA testing to select patients for mutation-directed therapy.
METHODS
We did an open-label, multicohort, phase 2a, platform trial of ctDNA testing in 18 UK hospitals. Participants were women (aged ≥18 years) with histologically confirmed advanced breast cancer and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-2. Patients had completed at least one previous line of treatment for advanced breast cancer or relapsed within 12 months of neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients were recruited into four parallel treatment cohorts matched to mutations identified in ctDNA: cohort A comprised patients with ESR1 mutations (treated with intramuscular extended-dose fulvestrant 500 mg); cohort B comprised patients with HER2 mutations (treated with oral neratinib 240 mg, and if oestrogen receptor-positive with intramuscular standard-dose fulvestrant); cohort C comprised patients with AKT1 mutations and oestrogen receptor-positive cancer (treated with oral capivasertib 400 mg plus intramuscular standard-dose fulvestrant); and cohort D comprised patients with AKT1 mutations and oestrogen receptor-negative cancer or PTEN mutation (treated with oral capivasertib 480 mg). Each cohort had a primary endpoint of confirmed objective response rate. For cohort A, 13 or more responses among 78 evaluable patients were required to infer activity and three or more among 16 were required for cohorts B, C, and D. Recruitment to all cohorts is complete and long-term follow-up is ongoing. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03182634; the European Clinical Trials database, EudraCT2015-003735-36; and the ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN16945804.
FINDINGS
Between Dec 21, 2016, and April 26, 2019, 1051 patients registered for the study, with ctDNA results available for 1034 patients. Agreement between ctDNA digital PCR and targeted sequencing was 96-99% (n=800, kappa 0·89-0·93). Sensitivity of digital PCR ctDNA testing for mutations identified in tissue sequencing was 93% (95% CI 83-98) overall and 98% (87-100) with contemporaneous biopsies. In all cohorts, combined median follow-up was 14·4 months (IQR 7·0-23·7). Cohorts B and C met or exceeded the target number of responses, with five (25% [95% CI 9-49]) of 20 patients in cohort B and four (22% [6-48]) of 18 patients in cohort C having a response. Cohorts A and D did not reach the target number of responses, with six (8% [95% CI 3-17]) of 74 in cohort A and two (11% [1-33]) of 19 patients in cohort D having a response. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were raised gamma-glutamyltransferase (13 [16%] of 80 patients; cohort A); diarrhoea (four [25%] of 20; cohort B); fatigue (four [22%] of 18; cohort C); and rash (five [26%] of 19; cohort D). 17 serious adverse reactions occurred in 11 patients, and there was one treatment-related death caused by grade 4 dyspnoea (in cohort C).
INTERPRETATION
ctDNA testing offers accurate, rapid genotyping that enables the selection of mutation-directed therapies for patients with breast cancer, with sufficient clinical validity for adoption into routine clinical practice. Our results demonstrate clinically relevant activity of targeted therapies against rare HER2 and AKT1 mutations, confirming these mutations could be targetable for breast cancer treatment.
FUNDING
Cancer Research UK, AstraZeneca, and Puma Biotechnology.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32919527
pii: S1470-2045(20)30444-7
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30444-7
pmc: PMC7599319
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Biomarkers, Tumor 0
Circulating Tumor DNA 0
ESR1 protein, human 0
Estrogen Receptor alpha 0
Pyrimidines 0
Pyrroles 0
Quinolines 0
Receptors, Estrogen 0
Fulvestrant 22X328QOC4
ERBB2 protein, human EC 2.7.10.1
Receptor, ErbB-2 EC 2.7.10.1
AKT1 protein, human EC 2.7.11.1
Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-akt EC 2.7.11.1
PTEN Phosphohydrolase EC 3.1.3.67
PTEN protein, human EC 3.1.3.67
neratinib JJH94R3PWB
capivasertib WFR23M21IE

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03182634']

Types de publication

Adaptive Clinical Trial Clinical Trial, Phase II Journal Article Multicenter Study Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1296-1308

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Références

Nat Biotechnol. 2013 Nov;31(11):1023-31
pubmed: 24142049
N Engl J Med. 2013 Mar 28;368(13):1199-209
pubmed: 23484797
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Mar;15(3):267-74
pubmed: 24508104
Nature. 2019 May;569(7757):560-564
pubmed: 31118521
Lancet Oncol. 2020 Mar;21(3):345-357
pubmed: 32035020
Cancer Discov. 2019 Oct;9(10):1388-1405
pubmed: 31315834
Cancer Discov. 2017 Mar;7(3):277-287
pubmed: 27986707
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Nov;18(11):e638
pubmed: 29208392
Nature. 2018 Feb 8;554(7691):189-194
pubmed: 29420467
Cell Rep. 2019 May 28;27(9):2690-2708.e10
pubmed: 31141692
Cancer Cell. 2018 Sep 10;34(3):427-438.e6
pubmed: 30205045
N Engl J Med. 2019 May 16;380(20):1929-1940
pubmed: 31091374
Cancer Discov. 2018 Nov;8(11):1390-1403
pubmed: 30206110
Nat Genet. 2013 Dec;45(12):1439-45
pubmed: 24185512
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Jun 1;36(16):1631-1641
pubmed: 29504847
JAMA Oncol. 2018 Jun 1;4(6):868-870
pubmed: 29242909
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jul 10;35(20):2251-2259
pubmed: 28489509
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jul 16;373(3):209-19
pubmed: 26030518
Lancet Oncol. 2013 Sep;14(10):989-98
pubmed: 23902874
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Feb 10;38(5):423-433
pubmed: 31841354
Clin Cancer Res. 2020 Feb 1;26(3):608-622
pubmed: 31591187
Nat Genet. 2019 Feb;51(2):207-216
pubmed: 30531871
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Oct;18(10):1360-1372
pubmed: 28800861

Auteurs

Nicholas C Turner (NC)

Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Breast Unit, Royal Marsden National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, London, UK. Electronic address: nicholas.turner@icr.ac.uk.

Belinda Kingston (B)

Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.

Lucy S Kilburn (LS)

Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.

Sarah Kernaghan (S)

Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.

Andrew M Wardley (AM)

National Institute for Health Research Manchester Clinical Research Facility, Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology Medicine & Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Iain R Macpherson (IR)

Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.

Richard D Baird (RD)

Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, Cambridge, UK.

Rebecca Roylance (R)

University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; National Institute for Health Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK.

Peter Stephens (P)

Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK.

Olga Oikonomidou (O)

Cancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, Edinburgh Cancer Centre, Western General Hospital, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Jeremy P Braybrooke (JP)

University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK.

Mark Tuthill (M)

Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.

Jacinta Abraham (J)

Velindre University NHS Trust, Cardiff, UK.

Matthew C Winter (MC)

Weston Park Hospital, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.

Hannah Bye (H)

Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK.

Michael Hubank (M)

National Institute for Health Research Centre for Molecular Pathology, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK.

Heidrun Gevensleben (H)

Institute of Pathology, Bonn University Hospital, Bonn, Germany.

Ros Cutts (R)

Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.

Claire Snowdon (C)

Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.

Daniel Rea (D)

University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.

David Cameron (D)

Cancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, Edinburgh Cancer Centre, Western General Hospital, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Abeer Shaaban (A)

University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.

Katrina Randle (K)

Independent Cancer Patients' Voice, London, UK.

Sue Martin (S)

Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.

Katie Wilkinson (K)

Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.

Laura Moretti (L)

Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.

Judith M Bliss (JM)

Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.

Alistair Ring (A)

Breast Unit, Royal Marsden National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH