Antibiotic prescribing and non-prescribing in nursing home residents with signs and symptoms ascribed to urinary tract infection (ANNA): study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial.
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Anti-Bacterial Agents
/ therapeutic use
Antimicrobial Stewardship
/ statistics & numerical data
Clinical Protocols
Drug Utilization
/ statistics & numerical data
Female
Humans
Inappropriate Prescribing
/ statistics & numerical data
Long-Term Care
/ methods
Male
Netherlands
/ epidemiology
Nursing Homes
/ statistics & numerical data
Practice Patterns, Physicians'
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Urinary Tract Infections
/ diagnosis
Antibiotic prescribing
Antibiotic stewardship
Decision support
Nursing homes
Randomized controlled trial
Urinary tract infection
Journal
BMC geriatrics
ISSN: 1471-2318
Titre abrégé: BMC Geriatr
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968548
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 09 2020
11 09 2020
Historique:
received:
31
12
2019
accepted:
22
07
2020
entrez:
11
9
2020
pubmed:
12
9
2020
medline:
1
12
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Antibiotic overprescribing for suspected urinary tract infection (UTI) in nursing homes (NHs) is common. Typical clinical scenarios in which antibiotics are inappropriately prescribed include response to nonspecific signs and symptoms and/or a positive urine test in the absence of symptoms referable to the urinary tract. These and other scenarios for inappropriate antibiotic prescribing were addressed in a recent international Delphi study which resulted in the development of a decision tool for the empiric treatment of UTI in frail older adults. The aim of the current study is to implement this decision tool, by integrating it into the electronic health record (EHR) and providing education on its content and use, and to evaluate its effect on appropriate antibiotic prescribing. An additional aim is to evaluate the quality of the intervention and the implementation process. A cluster Randomized Controlled Trial (cRCT) is conducted in sixteen NHs and aims to include 897 residents diagnosed with suspected UTI. NHs in the intervention group use the EHR-integrated decision tool, and receive education for physicians and nursing staff; in the control group care as usual is provided. Data is collected through case report forms within the EHR at the day of diagnosis and at 3, 7, and 21 days thereafter. The primary outcome is appropriate antibiotic prescribing for suspected UTI at the day of diagnosis. Secondary outcomes include the course of symptoms, alternative diagnoses, treatment changes, complications, hospitalization, and mortality. Data on total antibiotic prescribing are additionally collected in the participating NHs 12 months before and during the study. Finally, the process evaluation combines cRCT data with questionnaires and qualitative interviews with NH professionals. This is the first cRCT to evaluate the recently developed, international decision tool for empiric treatment of suspected UTI in NH residents. Study findings will elucidate the effect of the intervention on appropriate antibiotic prescribing for suspected UTI, and provide insight into the applicability of the decision tool in NHs in general and in specific subgroups of NH residents. With this study we aim to contribute to antibiotic stewardship efforts in long-term care. The ANNA study was registered at the Netherlands Trial Register on 26 February 2019, with identification number NTR NL7555 .
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Antibiotic overprescribing for suspected urinary tract infection (UTI) in nursing homes (NHs) is common. Typical clinical scenarios in which antibiotics are inappropriately prescribed include response to nonspecific signs and symptoms and/or a positive urine test in the absence of symptoms referable to the urinary tract. These and other scenarios for inappropriate antibiotic prescribing were addressed in a recent international Delphi study which resulted in the development of a decision tool for the empiric treatment of UTI in frail older adults. The aim of the current study is to implement this decision tool, by integrating it into the electronic health record (EHR) and providing education on its content and use, and to evaluate its effect on appropriate antibiotic prescribing. An additional aim is to evaluate the quality of the intervention and the implementation process.
METHODS
A cluster Randomized Controlled Trial (cRCT) is conducted in sixteen NHs and aims to include 897 residents diagnosed with suspected UTI. NHs in the intervention group use the EHR-integrated decision tool, and receive education for physicians and nursing staff; in the control group care as usual is provided. Data is collected through case report forms within the EHR at the day of diagnosis and at 3, 7, and 21 days thereafter. The primary outcome is appropriate antibiotic prescribing for suspected UTI at the day of diagnosis. Secondary outcomes include the course of symptoms, alternative diagnoses, treatment changes, complications, hospitalization, and mortality. Data on total antibiotic prescribing are additionally collected in the participating NHs 12 months before and during the study. Finally, the process evaluation combines cRCT data with questionnaires and qualitative interviews with NH professionals.
DISCUSSION
This is the first cRCT to evaluate the recently developed, international decision tool for empiric treatment of suspected UTI in NH residents. Study findings will elucidate the effect of the intervention on appropriate antibiotic prescribing for suspected UTI, and provide insight into the applicability of the decision tool in NHs in general and in specific subgroups of NH residents. With this study we aim to contribute to antibiotic stewardship efforts in long-term care.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
The ANNA study was registered at the Netherlands Trial Register on 26 February 2019, with identification number NTR NL7555 .
Identifiants
pubmed: 32912192
doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01662-0
pii: 10.1186/s12877-020-01662-0
pmc: PMC7488520
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anti-Bacterial Agents
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
341Subventions
Organisme : ZonMw
ID : 839120008
Pays : International
Références
Arch Intern Med. 2011 Mar 28;171(6):550-6
pubmed: 21444844
BMC Geriatr. 2014 Dec 16;14:136
pubmed: 25514874
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020 Jan;21(1):34-40.e1
pubmed: 31791900
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2012 Jul;13(6):568.e1-13
pubmed: 22575772
Pathogens. 2016 Apr 19;5(2):
pubmed: 27104571
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2016 Mar;37(3):319-26
pubmed: 26607408
Lancet. 2003 Oct 11;362(9391):1225-30
pubmed: 14568747
CMAJ. 2000 Aug 8;163(3):273-7
pubmed: 10951723
Clin Trials. 2005;2(2):99-107
pubmed: 16279131
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2004 May-Jun;5(3):207-12
pubmed: 15115583
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2015 Mar;16(3):229-37
pubmed: 25458444
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015 Jan;22(1):236-42
pubmed: 25125688
Implement Sci. 2009 Aug 07;4:50
pubmed: 19664226
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2001 Mar;22(3):167-75
pubmed: 11310697
Scand J Infect Dis. 2008;40(10):804-10
pubmed: 18609196
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009 Jun;57(6):963-70
pubmed: 19490243
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2018 Sep;19(9):757-764
pubmed: 29910137
CJEM. 2007 Mar;9(2):87-92
pubmed: 17391578
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2015 Jul;70(7):2153-62
pubmed: 25745104
BMC Fam Pract. 2011 May 19;12:36
pubmed: 21592413
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 09;2:CD003543
pubmed: 28178770