Barriers and strategies for implementing community-based interventions with minority elders: positive minds-strong bodies.

Anxiety CHW Depression Disability Immigrants Racial/ethnic minority elders

Journal

Implementation science communications
ISSN: 2662-2211
Titre abrégé: Implement Sci Commun
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101764360

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2020
Historique:
received: 16 10 2019
accepted: 20 04 2020
entrez: 5 9 2020
pubmed: 5 9 2020
medline: 5 9 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

By 2040, one out of three older adults in the USA are expected to belong to a racial/ethnic minority group. This population has an increased risk of mental and physical disability with significant barriers to access care. Community-based organizations (CBOs) often provide programming to serve minority and immigrant elders. Limited resources and other barriers such as lack of trained staff make it difficult to implement evidence-based interventions (EBIs) in CBOs for long-term adoption. Yet little is known about what factors can facilitate adoption of EBIs in CBOs serving minority elders. Positive-Minds-Strong Bodies (PM-SB), an evidence-based intervention offered in four languages, aims to reduce mental and physical disability for minority and immigrant elders through the efforts of community health workers and exercise trainers. The intervention consists of cognitive behavior therapy and exercise training sessions delivered over 6 months. During a recent clinical trial of this intervention, we elicited feedback from CBO staff to determine how best to facilitate the implementation and long-term sustainability of PM-SB within their agencies. We surveyed 30 CBO staff members, held four focus groups, and conducted 20 in-depth interviews to examine staff perspectives and to reveal factors or changes needed to facilitate long-term adoption in prospective CBOs. Participants reported that staff motivation and implementation could be improved through the following changes: increasing patient compensation for treatment sessions, decreasing levels of organizational accountability, and reducing staff demands embedded in the intervention. Although most staff perceived that PM-SB improved their agency's ability to address the health and well-being of elders, capacity-building strategies such as a "train-the-trainer" initiative were identified as priorities to address staff turnover for sustainability. Adapting the intervention to get financial reimbursement also emerged as vital. Augmenting financial incentives, streamlining procedures, and simplifying staff accountability were suggested strategies for facilitating the transition from a disability prevention clinical trial in minority and immigrant elders to a scalable implementation in routine services at CBOs. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02317432.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
By 2040, one out of three older adults in the USA are expected to belong to a racial/ethnic minority group. This population has an increased risk of mental and physical disability with significant barriers to access care. Community-based organizations (CBOs) often provide programming to serve minority and immigrant elders. Limited resources and other barriers such as lack of trained staff make it difficult to implement evidence-based interventions (EBIs) in CBOs for long-term adoption. Yet little is known about what factors can facilitate adoption of EBIs in CBOs serving minority elders.
METHODS METHODS
Positive-Minds-Strong Bodies (PM-SB), an evidence-based intervention offered in four languages, aims to reduce mental and physical disability for minority and immigrant elders through the efforts of community health workers and exercise trainers. The intervention consists of cognitive behavior therapy and exercise training sessions delivered over 6 months. During a recent clinical trial of this intervention, we elicited feedback from CBO staff to determine how best to facilitate the implementation and long-term sustainability of PM-SB within their agencies. We surveyed 30 CBO staff members, held four focus groups, and conducted 20 in-depth interviews to examine staff perspectives and to reveal factors or changes needed to facilitate long-term adoption in prospective CBOs.
RESULTS RESULTS
Participants reported that staff motivation and implementation could be improved through the following changes: increasing patient compensation for treatment sessions, decreasing levels of organizational accountability, and reducing staff demands embedded in the intervention. Although most staff perceived that PM-SB improved their agency's ability to address the health and well-being of elders, capacity-building strategies such as a "train-the-trainer" initiative were identified as priorities to address staff turnover for sustainability. Adapting the intervention to get financial reimbursement also emerged as vital.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Augmenting financial incentives, streamlining procedures, and simplifying staff accountability were suggested strategies for facilitating the transition from a disability prevention clinical trial in minority and immigrant elders to a scalable implementation in routine services at CBOs.
TRIAL REGISTRATION BACKGROUND
ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02317432.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32885198
doi: 10.1186/s43058-020-00034-4
pii: 34
pmc: PMC7427860
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02317432']

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

41

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2020.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interestsThe authors declare they have no competing interests.

Références

J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2009 Jun;16(2):178-85
pubmed: 19152056
Community Ment Health J. 1997 Dec;33(6):517-29
pubmed: 9435998
Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2018 Mar;41(1):55-64
pubmed: 29412848
Implement Sci. 2015 Apr 17;10:50
pubmed: 25889582
Popul Health Manag. 2017 Aug;20(4):262-270
pubmed: 28075695
Health Educ Res. 2012 Aug;27(4):717-28
pubmed: 22012968
Am J Community Psychol. 2019 Jun;63(3-4):366-377
pubmed: 30693961
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2009 Aug;197(8):623-6
pubmed: 19684501
Child Maltreat. 2012 Feb;17(1):67-79
pubmed: 22146861
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2013 Jul;26(4):319-34
pubmed: 23589506
Behav Res Ther. 2014 Dec;63:70-82
pubmed: 25305538
J Immigr Minor Health. 2012 Jun;14(3):467-74
pubmed: 21755311
Am J Public Health. 2012 Feb;102(2):319-28
pubmed: 22390446
AIDS Educ Prev. 2006 Aug;18(4 Suppl A):184-97
pubmed: 16987099
Eval Program Plann. 2011 Nov;34(4):382-9
pubmed: 21420171
Health Educ Behav. 2008 Jun;35(3):298-315
pubmed: 17200097
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013 Jan;61(1):18-25
pubmed: 23252464
AIDS Educ Prev. 2006 Aug;18(4 Suppl A):32-43
pubmed: 16987087
AIDS Educ Prev. 2011 Apr;23(2):105-17
pubmed: 21517660
Home Health Care Serv Q. 2001;20(1):1-20
pubmed: 11878073
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2001 Spring;9(2):113-35
pubmed: 11316616
Am J Community Psychol. 2008 Jun;41(3-4):182-96
pubmed: 18307028
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2015 Jan;42(1):1-5
pubmed: 24718647
Implement Sci. 2018 Jul 30;13(1):103
pubmed: 30060744
Am J Community Psychol. 2008 Jun;41(3-4):327-50
pubmed: 18322790
Pain Med. 2003 Sep;4(3):277-94
pubmed: 12974827
Soc Work. 2006 Jul;51(3):243-55
pubmed: 17076122
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2017 Jul 01;72(suppl_1):S11-S15
pubmed: 28575270
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2002 May;57(5):M308-14
pubmed: 11983725
Am J Community Psychol. 2008 Jun;41(3-4):171-81
pubmed: 18302018
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2016 Jul-Aug;65:98-103
pubmed: 27017414
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2002;16 Suppl 2:S50-5
pubmed: 12351915
Psychol Aging. 2010 Jun;25(2):453-63
pubmed: 20545429
Collegian. 2000 Jul;7(3):9-13
pubmed: 11858410
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Dec 12;15:547
pubmed: 26652172
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2019 Dec;27(12):1299-1313
pubmed: 31494015
Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Feb;78(2):184-90
pubmed: 19467822
Addict Behav. 2011 Jun;36(6):630-635
pubmed: 21310541
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2010 Jun;18(6):531-43
pubmed: 20220602
Implement Sci. 2018 Sep 26;13(1):125
pubmed: 30257683
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011 Jan;38(1):44-53
pubmed: 20967495
Implement Sci. 2015 May 29;10:80
pubmed: 26018220
Am J Community Psychol. 2008 Jun;41(3-4):290-303
pubmed: 18307029
AIDS Behav. 2009 Jun;13(3):424-9
pubmed: 19360464
AIDS Educ Prev. 2006 Aug;18(4 Suppl A):59-73
pubmed: 16987089

Auteurs

Thalia Porteny (T)

Interfaculty Initiative in Health Policy, Graduate School of Arts and Science, Harvard University, 1350 Massachusetts Avenue, Suite 350, Cambridge, MA 02138-3654 USA.

Margarita Alegría (M)

Disparities Research Unit, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, 50 Staniford Street, Boston, MA 02114 USA.
Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, 401 Park Drive, Boston, MA 02215 USA.

Paola Del Cueto (P)

Disparities Research Unit, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, 50 Staniford Street, Boston, MA 02114 USA.

Larimar Fuentes (L)

Disparities Research Unit, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, 50 Staniford Street, Boston, MA 02114 USA.

Sheri Lapatin Markle (SL)

Disparities Research Unit, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, 50 Staniford Street, Boston, MA 02114 USA.

Amanda NeMoyer (A)

Disparities Research Unit, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, 50 Staniford Street, Boston, MA 02114 USA.
Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, 180 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115 USA.

Giselle K Perez (GK)

Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, 401 Park Drive, Boston, MA 02215 USA.
Health Policy Research Center at the Mongan Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, 100 Cambridge Street, Boston, MA 02114 USA.

Classifications MeSH