Vertebral growth modulation by posterior dynamic deformity correction device in skeletally immature patients with moderate adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Correction
Dynamic
Idiopathic scoliosis
Posterior
Remodeling
Journal
Spine deformity
ISSN: 2212-1358
Titre abrégé: Spine Deform
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101603979
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2021
01 2021
Historique:
received:
11
07
2020
accepted:
10
08
2020
pubmed:
23
8
2020
medline:
19
11
2021
entrez:
23
8
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Retrospective, comparative, multicenter. Growth modulating spinal implants are used in the management of scoliosis such as anterior vertebral body tethering. A motion-sparing posterior device (PDDC) was recently approved for the treatment of moderate AIS. The purpose of this study was to determine if the PDDC can modulate growth in skeletally immature patients with AIS. From a database of patients treated with the PDDC over 4 years, we identified those who had a minimum of 2 years follow-up. Pre-operative and post-operative Cobb angles and coronal plane wedging of the apical vertebra were evaluated on standing full length radiographs. Independent sample t test and one-way ANOVA with post-hoc Tukey HSD analysis was used to compare three groups in varying skeletal maturity: Risser 0-1, Risser 2-3, and Risser 4-5. 45 patients (14.2-years old, 11-17) were evaluated with a mean pre-op curve of 46° (35°-66°). The average preoperative major curve magnitude, of either Lenke 1 or 5 curve type, was similar among the three groups 47.6°, 46° and 41.5°. Deformity correction was similar in the three groups, with reduction to 26.4°, 20.4° and 26.2°, respectively, at final follow-up [p < 0.05]. Pre-op wedging 7.4° (3.8°-15°) was reduced after surgery to 5.7° (1°-15°) (p < 0.05). Of those patients, Risser 0-1 (n = 16) had preoperative wedging of 9.5° (6°-14.5°) that was reduced to 5.4° (1°-8°) postoperatively (p < 0.05); Risser 2-3 (n = 15) had pre-op 7.7° (4°-15°) vs. post-op 7.0° (3°-15°); Risser 4-5 (n = 14) had pre-op 4.8° (3.8°-6.5°) vs. post-op 4.7° (3.7°-6.5°). Delta Wedging in Risser 0-1 stage was significantly different than for Risser 2-3 and for Risser 4-5. The posterior dynamic deformity correction device was able to modulate vertebral body wedging in skeletally immature patients with AIS. This was most evident in patients who were Risser 0-1. In contrast, curve correction was similar among the three groups. This finding lends support to the device's ability to modulate growth.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32827087
doi: 10.1007/s43390-020-00189-z
pii: 10.1007/s43390-020-00189-z
pmc: PMC7775858
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
149-153Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Références
J Orthop Res. 2006 Jun;24(6):1327-34
pubmed: 16705695
J Neurosurg Spine. 2020 Jan 10;:1-7
pubmed: 31923888
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Jun;92(6):1343-52
pubmed: 20516309
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2011 Dec;49(12):1437-45
pubmed: 21755319
Spine Deform. 2019 Nov;7(6):899-909
pubmed: 31732000
Spine Deform. 2019 Sep;7(5):720-728
pubmed: 31495471
Spine J. 2019 Dec;19(12):1917-1925
pubmed: 31325626
Scoliosis. 2015 Feb 05;10:4
pubmed: 25685175
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 Oct 3;100(19):1691-1697
pubmed: 30277999
Spine Deform. 2019 Mar;7(2):203-212
pubmed: 30660213
Spine Deform. 2020 Apr;8(2):221-226
pubmed: 32026438
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996 May 15;21(10):1162-7
pubmed: 8727190
J Biomech Eng. 2002 Dec;124(6):784-90
pubmed: 12596648
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 1997 Nov;26(11):798-800
pubmed: 9402217