Individual and environmental factors that influence longevity of newcomers to nursing and midwifery: a scoping review protocol.
Journal
JBI evidence synthesis
ISSN: 2689-8381
Titre abrégé: JBI Evid Synth
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101764819
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2020
06 2020
Historique:
entrez:
20
8
2020
pubmed:
20
8
2020
medline:
15
5
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The objective of this review is to identify and map the literature that describes the individual and environmental factors that influence nurses and midwives to stay in or leave their discipline within the first three years of practice. The turnover rate of newcomers within their first three years of nursing and midwifery is higher than in later years and is contributing to a worldwide shortage. Both individual and environmental factors, often in combination, contribute to this attrition. Many studies demonstrate the associations of factors with turnover or intention to stay; however, the scope of factors has not been documented. Newcomers are defined as registered nurses and registered midwives within the first three years of entering their discipline. Quantitative and qualitative studies and systematic reviews that explore individual or environmental factors that influence the decision to leave or to remain in nursing and midwifery in any context will be considered. Factors may include coping, anxiety, mindfulness, practice environment, or combinations such as resilience, satisfaction, and burnout. Articles must have been peer reviewed. Literature published since 1974 in English will be considered. Newcomers who have completed skills-based training will be excluded. The JBI method for scoping reviews will be followed. An extensive search of multiple databases and gray literature will be undertaken. Retrieval of full-text studies and data extraction will be performed independently by two reviewers. Data extracted will be synthesized and results reported using a mind map, tables, and narrative form.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32813374
doi: 10.11124/JBIES-20-00003
pii: 02174543-202006000-00005
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1271-1277Références
World Health Organization. Global health observatory data: density of nursing and midwifery personnel [Internet]. 2019 [cited 21 Oct 2019]. Available from: https://www.who.int/gho/health_workforce/nursing_midwifery_density/en/.
World Health Organization. Global strategy on human resources for health: workforce 2030 [Internet]. WHO Document Production Services, Geneva, Switzerland; 2016 [cited 21 Oct 2019]. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/250368/9789241511131-eng.pdf.
Bureau of Labor Statistics US. Department of Labor, occupational outlook handbook, registered nurses [Internet]. US: Bureau of Labor Statistics; 2019 [cited 21 Oct 2019]. Available from: https://www.bls.gov/ooh/healthcare/registered-nurses.htm.
Health Workforce Australia. Australia's future health workforce – nurses overview report [Internet]. Canberra: Communication Branch, Department of Health; 2014 [cited 21 Oct 2019]. Available from: https://www1.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/34AA7E6FDB8C16AACA257D9500112F25/$File/AFHW%20-%20Nurses%20overview%20report.pdf.
Tomblin MG, Birch S, MacKenzie A, Alder R, Lethbridge L, Little L. Eliminating the shortage of registered nurses in Canada: an exercise in applied needs-based planning. Health Policy 2012; 105 (2–3):192–202.
Nursing Midwifery Council. The NMC register: 31 March 2019 [Internet]. London: NMC; 2019 [cited 21 Oct 2019]. Available from: https://www.nmc.org.uk/globalassets/sitedocuments/other-publications/nmc-register-data-march-19.pdf.
Dewanto A, Wardhani V. Nurse turnover and perceived causes and consequences: a preliminary study at private hospitals in Indonesia. BMC Nurs 2018; S2 (52):1–15. 17.
Duffield C, Roche M, Homer C, Buchan J, Dimitrelis S. A comparative review of nurse turnover rates and costs across countries. J Adv Nurs 2014; 70 (12):2703–2712.
Hayes L, O’Brien-Pallas L, Duffield C, Shamian J, Buchan J, Hughes F, et al. Nurse turnover: a literature review – an update. Int J Nurs Stud 2012; 49 (7):887–905.
Roche MA, Duffield CM, Caroline H, Buchan J, Dimitrelis S. The rate and cost of nurse turnover in Australia. Collegian 2015; 22:353–358.
Rickard G, Lenthall S, Dollard M, Opie T, Knight S, Dunn S, et al. Organisational intervention to reduce occupational stress and turnover in hospital nurses in the Northern Territory. Collegian 2012; 19 (4):211–221.
NSI Nursing Solutions Inc. 2020 National health care retention and RN staffing report [Internet]. Pennsylvania: NSI; 2020 [cited 29 Mar 2020]. Available from: https://www.nsinursingsolutions.com/Documents/Library/NSI_National_Health_Care_Retention_Report.pdf.
Mills J, Chamberlain-Salaun J, Harrison H, Yates K, O'Shea A. Retaining early career registered nurses: a case study. BMC Nurs 2016; 15 (57):1–6.
Aiken LH, Sloane D, Griffiths P, Rafferty AM, Bruyneel L, McHugh M, et al. Nursing skill mix in European hospitals: cross-sectional study of the association with mortality, patient ratings, and quality of care. BMJ Qual Saf 2017; 26 (7):559–568.
Hart PL, Brannan JD, De Chesnay M. Resilience in nurses: an integrative review. J Nurs Manag 2014; 22 (6):720–734.
Rees CS, Heritage B, Osseiran-Moisson R, Chamberlain D, Cusack L, Anderson J, et al. Can we predict burnout among student nurses? An exploration of the ICWR-1 Model of Individual Psychological Resilience. Front Psychol 2016; 7 (1072):1–11.
Cusack L, Smith M, Hegney D, Rees CS, Breen LJ, Witt RR, et al. Exploring environmental factors in nursing workplaces that promote psychological resilience: constructing a unified theoretical model. Front Psychol 2016; 7 (600):1–8.
Rees CS, Eley R, Osseiran-Moisson R, Francis K, Cusack L, Heritage B, et al. Individual and environmental determinants of burnout among nurses. J Health Serv Res Policy 2019; 24 (3):191–200.
Aiken LH, Sermeus W, Van Den Heede K, Sloane DM, Busse R, McKee M, et al. Patient safety, satisfaction, and quality of hospital care: cross sectional surveys of nurses and patients in 12 countries in Europe and the United States. Br Med J 2012; 344 (e1717):1–14.
Hawkins N, Jeong S, Smith T. New graduate registered nurses’ exposure to negative workplace behavior in the acute care setting: an integrative review. Int J Nurs Stud 2019; 93:41–54.
van Rooyen D, Jordan P, Ham-Baloyi W, Caka E. A comprehensive literature review of guidelines facilitating transition of newly graduated nurses to professional nurses. Nurse Educ Pract 2018; 30 (May):35–41.
Quek G, Shorey S. Perceptions, experiences, and needs of nursing preceptors and their preceptees on preceptorship: an integrative review. J Prof Nurs 2018; 34 (5):417–428.
Edwards D, Carrier J, Hawker C. Effectiveness of strategies and interventions aiming to assist the transition from student to newly qualified nurse: an update systematic review protocol. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep 2019; 17 (2):157–163.
Brook J, Aitken L, Webb R, MacLaren J, Salmon D. Characteristics of successful interventions to reduce turnover and increase retention of early career nurses: a systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud 2019; 91:47–59.
Calleja P, Adonteng-Kissi B, Romero B. Transition support for new graduate nurses to rural and remote practice: a scoping review. Nurse Ed Today 2019; 76:8–20.
Chamberlain D, Hegney D, Harvey C, Knight B, Garrahy A, Tsai LP-S. The factors influencing the effective early career and rapid transition to a nursing specialty in differing contexts of practice: a modified Delphi consensus study. BMJ Open 2019; 9 (8):e028541.
Wu T-Y, Fox DP, Stokes C, Adam C. Work-related stress and intention to quit in newly graduated nurses. Nurse Ed Today 2012; 32 (6):669–674.
Kramer M. Reality shock, why nurses leave nursing. Saint Louis: C V Mosby Co; 1974.
Peters MDJ, Godfrey C, McInerney P, Baldini Soares C, Khalil H, Parker D. Chapter 11: Scoping reviews. In: Aromataris E, Munn Z (Editors). JBI Reviewer's Manual [Internet]. Adelaide: JBI, 2017 [cited 17 Jan 2020]. Available from: https://reviewersmanual.joannabriggs.org/.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman D. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 2009; 151 (4):264–269.