Predefined vs data-guided training prescription based on autonomic nervous system variation: A systematic review.
cardiorespiratory fitness
eHealth
endurance
innovation
technology
training
wearable
Journal
Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports
ISSN: 1600-0838
Titre abrégé: Scand J Med Sci Sports
Pays: Denmark
ID NLM: 9111504
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2020
Dec 2020
Historique:
received:
26
02
2020
revised:
03
07
2020
accepted:
22
07
2020
pubmed:
14
8
2020
medline:
13
4
2021
entrez:
14
8
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Monitoring variations in the functioning of the autonomic nervous system may help personalize training of runners and provide more pronounced physiological adaptations and performance improvements. We systematically reviewed the scientific literature comparing physiological adaptations and/or improvements in performance following training based on responses of the autonomic nervous system (ie, changes in heart rate variability) and predefined training. PubMed, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science were searched systematically in July 2019. Keywords related to endurance, running, autonomic nervous system, and training. Studies were included if they (a) involved interventions consisting predominantly of running training; (b) lasted at least 3 weeks; (c) reported pre- and post-intervention assessment of running performance and/or physiological parameters; (d) included an experimental group performing training adjusted continuously on the basis of alterations in HRV and a control group; and (e) involved healthy runners. Five studies involving six interventions and 166 participants fulfilled our inclusion criteria. Four HRV-based interventions reduced the amount of moderate- and/or high-intensity training significantly. In five interventions, improvements in performance parameters (3000 m, 5000 m, Loadmax, Tlim) were more pronounced following HRV-based training. Peak oxygen uptake (
Types de publication
Journal Article
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2291-2304Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Authors. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science In Sports published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Düking P, Achtzehn S, Holmberg HC, Sperlich B. Integrated framework of load monitoring by a combination of smartphone applications, wearables and point-of-care testing provides feedback that allows individual responsive adjustments to activities of daily living. Sensors (Basel). 2018;18(5):1632.
Bellenger CR, Fuller JT, Thomson RL, Davison K, Robertson EY, Buckley JD. Monitoring athletic training status through autonomic heart rate regulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2016;46(10):1461-1486.
Soligard T, Schwellnus M, Alonso JM, et al. How much is too much? (Part 1) International Olympic Committee consensus statement on load in sport and risk of injury. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50(17):1030-1041.
Seiler KS, Kjerland GO. Quantifying training intensity distribution in elite endurance athletes: is there evidence for an "optimal" distribution? Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2006;16(1):49-56.
Kiely J. Periodization paradigms in the 21st century: evidence-led or tradition-driven? Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2012;7(3):242-250.
Zinner C, Olstad DS, Sperlich B. Mesocycles with Different Training Intensity Distribution in Recreational Runners. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2018;50(8):1641-1648.
Skinner JS, Wilmore KM, Krasnoff JB, et al. Adaptation to a standardized training program and changes in fitness in a large, heterogeneous population: the HERITAGE Family Study. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;32(1):157-161.
da Silva DF, Ferraro ZM, Adamo KB, Machado FA. Endurance running training individually-guided by Hrv in untrained women. J Strength Cond Res. 2017;33(3):736-746.
Stanley J, Peake JM, Buchheit M. Cardiac parasympathetic reactivation following exercise: implications for training prescription. Sports Med. 2013;43(12):1259-1277.
Plews DJ, Laursen PB, Stanley J, Kilding AE, Buchheit M. Training adaptation and heart rate variability in elite endurance athletes: opening the door to effective monitoring. Sports Med. 2013;43(9):773-781.
Singh N, Moneghetti KJ, Christle JW, Hadley D, Plews D, Froelicher V. Heart rate variability: an old metric with new meaning in the era of using mhealth technologies for health and exercise training guidance. Part one: physiology and methods. Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2018;7(3):193-198.
Shaffer F, Ginsberg JP. An overview of heart rate variability metrics and norms. Front Public Health. 2017;5:258.
Martinmaki K, Rusko H. Time-frequency analysis of heart rate variability during immediate recovery from low and high intensity exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2008;102(3):353-360.
Nuuttila OP, Nikander A, Polomoshnov D, Laukkanen JA, Hakkinen K. Effects of HRV-guided vs. predetermined block training on performance, HRV and serum hormones. Int J Sports Med. 2017;38(12):909-920.
Malik M, Bigger JT, Camm AJ, et al. Heart rate variability: Standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use. Eur Heart J. 1996;17(3):354-381.
Draghici AE, Taylor JA. The physiological basis and measurement of heart rate variability in humans. J Physiol Anthropol. 2016;35(1):22.
Buchheit M. Monitoring training status with HR measures: do all roads lead to Rome? Front Physiol. 2014;5:73.
Dobbs WC, Fedewa MV, MacDonald HV, et al. The accuracy of acquiring heart rate variability from portable devices: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2019;49(3):417-435.
Düking P, Holmberg HC, Sperlich B. Instant biofeedback provided by wearable sensor technology can help to optimize exercise and prevent injury and overuse. Front Physiol. 2017;8:167.
Kiviniemi AM, Hautala AJ, Kinnunen H, Tulppo MP. Endurance training guided individually by daily heart rate variability measurements. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2007;101(6):743-751.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. Open Med. 2009;3(3):e123-e130.
Olivo SA, Macedo LG, Gadotti IC, Fuentes J, Stanton T, Magee DJ. Scales to assess the quality of randomized controlled trials: a systematic review. Phys Ther. 2008;88(2):156-175.
Maher CG, Sherrington C, Herbert RD, Moseley AM, Elkins M. Reliability of the PEDro scale for rating quality of randomized controlled trials. Phys Ther. 2003;83(8):713-721.
Kiviniemi AM, Hautala AJ, Kinnunen H, et al. Daily exercise prescription on the basis of HR variability among men and women. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010;42(7):1355-1363.
Vesterinen V, Nummela A, Heikura I, et al. Individual endurance training prescription with heart rate variability. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016;48(7):1347-1354.
Scharhag-Rosenberger F, Meyer T, Gassler N, Faude O, Kindermann W. Exercise at given percentages of VO2max: heterogeneous metabolic responses between individuals. J Sci Med Sport. 2010;13(1):74-79.
Kleiger RE, Stein PK, Bigger JT Jr. Heart rate variability: measurement and clinical utility. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2005;10(1):88-101.
Ciccone AB, Siedlik JA, Wecht JM, Deckert JA, Nguyen ND, Weir JP. Reminder: RMSSD and SD1 are identical heart rate variability metrics. Muscle Nerve. 2017;56(4):674-678.
Monfredi O, Lyashkov AE, Johnsen AB, et al. Biophysical characterization of the underappreciated and important relationship between heart rate variability and heart rate. Hypertension. 2014;64(6):1334-1343.
Stauss HM. Heart rate variability: just a surrogate for mean heart rate? Hypertension. 2014;64(6):1184-1186.
Düking P, Hotho A, Holmberg HC, Fuss FK, Sperlich B. Comparison of Non-Invasive Individual Monitoring of the Training and Health of Athletes with Commercially Available Wearable Technologies. Front Physiol. 2016;7:71.
Plews DJ, Scott B, Altini M, Wood M, Kilding AE, Laursen PB. Comparison of heart-rate-variability recording with smartphone photoplethysmography, Polar H7 chest strap, and electrocardiography. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2017;12(10):1324-1328.
Lu G, Yang F, Taylor JA, Stein JF. A comparison of photoplethysmography and ECG recording to analyse heart rate variability in healthy subjects. J Med Engineer Technol. 2009;33(8):634-641.
Perrotta AS, Jeklin AT, Hives BA, Meanwell LE, Warburton DE. Validity of the elite HRV smartphone application for examining heart rate variability in a field-based setting. J Strength Cond Res. 2017;31(8):2296-2302.
Schafer A, Vagedes J. How accurate is pulse rate variability as an estimate of heart rate variability? A review on studies comparing photoplethysmographic technology with an electrocardiogram. Int J Cardiol. 2013;166(1):15-29.