Economic implications of reducing caesarean section rates - Analysis of two health systems.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
17
06
2019
accepted:
07
01
2020
entrez:
30
7
2020
pubmed:
30
7
2020
medline:
25
9
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Caesarean section (CS) rates throughout Europe have risen significantly over the last two decades. As well as being an important clinical issue, these changes in mode of birth may have substantial resource implications. Policy initiatives to curb this rise have had to contend with the multiplier effect of women who had a CS for their first birth having a greater likelihood of requiring one during subsequent births, thus making it difficult to decrease CS rates in the short term. Our study examines the long-term resource implications of reducing CS rates among first-time mothers, as well as improving rates of vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC), among an annual cohort of women over the course of their most active childbearing years (18 to 44 years) in two public health systems in Europe. We found that the economic benefit of improvements in these two outcomes is considerable, with the net present value of the savings associated with a five-percentage-point change in nulliparous CS rates and VBAC rates being €1.1million and £9.8million per annual cohort of 18-year-olds in Ireland and England/Wales, respectively. Reductions in CS rates among first-time mothers are associated with a greater payoff than comparable increases in VBAC rates. The net present value of achieving CS rates comparable to those currently observed in the best performing Scandinavian countries was €3.5M and £23.0M per annual cohort in Ireland and England/Wales, respectively.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32722668
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228309
pii: PONE-D-19-17170
pmc: PMC7386590
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0228309Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Lancet. 2018 Oct 13;392(10155):1341-1348
pubmed: 30322584
Lancet. 2018 Oct 13;392(10155):1358-1368
pubmed: 30322586
BMJ. 2015 Nov 04;351:h5516
pubmed: 26538498
Lancet. 2018 Oct 13;392(10155):1349-1357
pubmed: 30322585
Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Dec;122(6):1169-75
pubmed: 24201683
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019 Apr;235:42-48
pubmed: 30784826