The neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio has a role in predicting the effectiveness of nivolumab in Japanese patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a multi-institutional retrospective study.
Metastatic renal cell carcinoma
Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio
Nivolumab
Journal
BMC urology
ISSN: 1471-2490
Titre abrégé: BMC Urol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968571
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
25 Jul 2020
25 Jul 2020
Historique:
received:
10
07
2019
accepted:
20
07
2020
entrez:
27
7
2020
pubmed:
28
7
2020
medline:
23
4
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a well-known prognostic marker in various cancers. However, its role as a predictive marker for the effectiveness of nivolumab in patients with metastatic RCC (mRCC) remains unclear. We evaluated the relationships between the NLR and progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) in mRCC patients treated with nivolumab. The data of 52 mRCC patients who received nivolumab therapy were collected from seven institutes and evaluated. The median follow-up period from treatment with nivolumab was 25.2 months (IQR 15.5-33.2). The median duration of nivolumab therapy was 7.1 months (IQR 2.9-24.4). The objective response rate was 25% and the 1- and 2-year PFS rates were 46.2 and 25.2%, respectively. The median NLR values at baseline and 4 weeks were 3.7 (IQR 2.7-5.1) and 3.3 (IQR 2.4-5.7), respectively. In the multivariate analysis, an NLR of ≥3 at 4 weeks was an independent predictor of PFS (P = 0.013) and OS (P = 0.034). The 1-year PFS of patients with an NLR of < 3 at 4 weeks was better than that of those with an NLR of ≥3 (75% versus 29%, P = 0.011). The 1-year OS of patients with an NLR of < 3 at 4 weeks was also better than that of those with an NLR of ≥3 (95% versus 71%, P = 0.020). Although the baseline NLR was not associated with PFS or OS, an NLR of ≥3 at 4 weeks after the initiation of therapy might be a robust predictor of poor PFS and OS in mRCC patients undergoing sequential treatment with nivolumab.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a well-known prognostic marker in various cancers. However, its role as a predictive marker for the effectiveness of nivolumab in patients with metastatic RCC (mRCC) remains unclear. We evaluated the relationships between the NLR and progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) in mRCC patients treated with nivolumab.
METHODS
METHODS
The data of 52 mRCC patients who received nivolumab therapy were collected from seven institutes and evaluated. The median follow-up period from treatment with nivolumab was 25.2 months (IQR 15.5-33.2).
RESULTS
RESULTS
The median duration of nivolumab therapy was 7.1 months (IQR 2.9-24.4). The objective response rate was 25% and the 1- and 2-year PFS rates were 46.2 and 25.2%, respectively. The median NLR values at baseline and 4 weeks were 3.7 (IQR 2.7-5.1) and 3.3 (IQR 2.4-5.7), respectively. In the multivariate analysis, an NLR of ≥3 at 4 weeks was an independent predictor of PFS (P = 0.013) and OS (P = 0.034). The 1-year PFS of patients with an NLR of < 3 at 4 weeks was better than that of those with an NLR of ≥3 (75% versus 29%, P = 0.011). The 1-year OS of patients with an NLR of < 3 at 4 weeks was also better than that of those with an NLR of ≥3 (95% versus 71%, P = 0.020).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Although the baseline NLR was not associated with PFS or OS, an NLR of ≥3 at 4 weeks after the initiation of therapy might be a robust predictor of poor PFS and OS in mRCC patients undergoing sequential treatment with nivolumab.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32711491
doi: 10.1186/s12894-020-00679-2
pii: 10.1186/s12894-020-00679-2
pmc: PMC7382809
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological
0
Nivolumab
31YO63LBSN
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
110Références
Eur J Cancer. 2009 Jan;45(2):228-47
pubmed: 19097774
N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 5;373(19):1803-13
pubmed: 26406148
Br J Cancer. 2013 Jul 9;109(1):147-53
pubmed: 23778526
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2018 Aug 1;10(8):
pubmed: 28778871
Urol Oncol. 2017 Apr;35(4):135-141
pubmed: 28233671
Urol Oncol. 2014 Nov;32(8):1277-84
pubmed: 25017696
Int J Clin Oncol. 2014 Feb;19(1):139-45
pubmed: 23299279
Med Oncol. 2013 Jun;30(2):556
pubmed: 23539200
J Clin Oncol. 2002 Jan 1;20(1):289-96
pubmed: 11773181
J Immunother Cancer. 2017 Oct 17;5(1):82
pubmed: 29041991
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 May 29;106(6):dju124
pubmed: 24875653
J Immunother Cancer. 2018 Jan 22;6(1):5
pubmed: 29353553
BMJ Open. 2015 Apr 08;5(4):e006404
pubmed: 25854964
BJU Int. 2008 Apr;101(8):959-63
pubmed: 18190639
Urol Oncol. 2016 Nov;34(11):483.e17-483.e24
pubmed: 27646875
Cancer. 2016 Jul 15;122(14):2158-67
pubmed: 27152949
Immunity. 2013 Jul 25;39(1):1-10
pubmed: 23890059
J Urol. 2013 Dec;190(6):1999-2004
pubmed: 23831313
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2013 Jun;11(2):141-8
pubmed: 23083797
Lancet Oncol. 2013 Feb;14(2):141-8
pubmed: 23312463
Eur Urol. 2016 Aug;70(2):358-64
pubmed: 26924770
J Urol. 2012 Feb;187(2):411-7
pubmed: 22177153
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2016 Oct;14(5):457-464
pubmed: 26980234