Opioid agonist therapy uptake among people who inject drugs: the findings of two consecutive bio-behavioral surveillance surveys in Iran.
Harm reduction
Iran
Opioid agonist therapy
People who inject drugs
Surveillance
Journal
Harm reduction journal
ISSN: 1477-7517
Titre abrégé: Harm Reduct J
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101153624
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 07 2020
22 07 2020
Historique:
received:
20
04
2020
accepted:
26
06
2020
entrez:
24
7
2020
pubmed:
24
7
2020
medline:
13
7
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Opioid agonist therapy (OAT) uptake has been associated with multiple positive health outcomes among people who inject drugs (PWID). This study evaluated the pattern of OAT uptake among PWID in two consecutive national bio-behavioral surveillance surveys (2010 and 2014) in Iran. Data were obtained from two national bio-behavioral surveillance surveys (N The prevalence of OAT uptake decreased from 49.2% in 2010 to 45.8% in 2014 (P value = 0.033). OAT uptake varied across the studied cities ranging from 0.0 to 69.3% in the 2010 survey and 3.2 to 75.5% in the 2014 survey. Ever being married (AOR = 1.40; 95% CI 1.12, 1.75), having a history of incarceration (AOR = 1.56; 95% CI 1.16, 2.09), and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) sero-positivity (AOR = 1.63; 95% CI 1.08, 2.50) were associated with OAT uptake. Conversely, PWID who reported using only non-opioid drugs (AOR = 0.43; 95% CI 0.26, 0.71) and those who reported concurrent use of opioid and non-opioid drugs (AOR = 0.66; 95% CI 0.51, 0.86) were less likely to uptake OAT. Although OAT uptake among PWID in Iran is above the 40% threshold defined by the World Health Organization, there remain significant disparities across urban settings in Iran. Importantly, the OAT services appear to be serving high-risk PWID including those living with HIV and those with a history of incarceration. Evaluating service integration including mental health, HIV and hepatitis C virus care, and other harm reduction services may support the optimization of health outcomes associated with OAT across Iran.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Opioid agonist therapy (OAT) uptake has been associated with multiple positive health outcomes among people who inject drugs (PWID). This study evaluated the pattern of OAT uptake among PWID in two consecutive national bio-behavioral surveillance surveys (2010 and 2014) in Iran.
METHODS
Data were obtained from two national bio-behavioral surveillance surveys (N
RESULTS
The prevalence of OAT uptake decreased from 49.2% in 2010 to 45.8% in 2014 (P value = 0.033). OAT uptake varied across the studied cities ranging from 0.0 to 69.3% in the 2010 survey and 3.2 to 75.5% in the 2014 survey. Ever being married (AOR = 1.40; 95% CI 1.12, 1.75), having a history of incarceration (AOR = 1.56; 95% CI 1.16, 2.09), and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) sero-positivity (AOR = 1.63; 95% CI 1.08, 2.50) were associated with OAT uptake. Conversely, PWID who reported using only non-opioid drugs (AOR = 0.43; 95% CI 0.26, 0.71) and those who reported concurrent use of opioid and non-opioid drugs (AOR = 0.66; 95% CI 0.51, 0.86) were less likely to uptake OAT.
CONCLUSIONS
Although OAT uptake among PWID in Iran is above the 40% threshold defined by the World Health Organization, there remain significant disparities across urban settings in Iran. Importantly, the OAT services appear to be serving high-risk PWID including those living with HIV and those with a history of incarceration. Evaluating service integration including mental health, HIV and hepatitis C virus care, and other harm reduction services may support the optimization of health outcomes associated with OAT across Iran.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32698875
doi: 10.1186/s12954-020-00392-1
pii: 10.1186/s12954-020-00392-1
pmc: PMC7373839
doi:
Substances chimiques
Analgesics, Opioid
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
50Subventions
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : R25 MH064712
Pays : United States
Références
Int J Equity Health. 2018 Jun 11;17(1):75
pubmed: 29890990
Int J Drug Policy. 2010 May;21(3):167-72
pubmed: 19395250
Addiction. 2014 Dec;109(12):2060-1
pubmed: 25384936
Sex Transm Infect. 2013 Nov;89 Suppl 3:iii29-32
pubmed: 24037249
Int J Drug Policy. 2012 Jul;23(4):333-7
pubmed: 21996166
Int J Drug Policy. 2012 Jul;23(4):271-8
pubmed: 22000694
AIDS Behav. 2019 Jun;23(6):1594-1603
pubmed: 30460664
J Opioid Manag. 2006 Jan-Feb;2(1):35-41
pubmed: 17319116
J Food Drug Anal. 2013 Dec;21(4):S59-S61
pubmed: 25267887
Ann Epidemiol. 2019 Jul;35:29-34
pubmed: 31171443
J Prim Prev. 2020 Feb;41(1):29-38
pubmed: 31912408
Addiction. 2017 Aug;112(8):1408-1418
pubmed: 28160345
Addict Health. 2017 Apr;9(2):81-87
pubmed: 29299210
Int J Drug Policy. 2016 May;31:147-52
pubmed: 26980349
Int J Infect Dis. 2015 Nov;40:116-30
pubmed: 26460088
Addiction. 2020 Jul;115(7):1395-1403
pubmed: 31737965
Bull World Health Organ. 2011 Apr 1;89(4):243
pubmed: 21479084
Iran J Public Health. 2013 Dec;42(12):1430-7
pubmed: 26060645
Harm Reduct J. 2006 Mar 18;3:12
pubmed: 16545137
AIDS Behav. 2018 Jul;22(Suppl 1):10-18
pubmed: 29766329
Asian J Psychiatr. 2015 Aug;16:78-83
pubmed: 26168763
J Int AIDS Soc. 2017 May 30;20(1):21585
pubmed: 28692211
Clin Infect Dis. 2016 Oct 15;63(8):1094-1104
pubmed: 27343545