Assessing conformal thin film growth under nonstochastic deposition conditions: application of a phenomenological model of roughness replication to synthetic topographic images.

Coatings conformal deposition image reconstruction microscopy and microanalysis techniques power spectral density roughness thin films

Journal

Journal of microscopy
ISSN: 1365-2818
Titre abrégé: J Microsc
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0204522

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 2020
Historique:
received: 30 03 2020
revised: 24 06 2020
accepted: 07 07 2020
pubmed: 22 7 2020
medline: 22 7 2020
entrez: 22 7 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

In this work, a simple method to follow the evolution of the surface of thin films during growth on substrates characterised by high roughness is detailed. To account for real cases as much as possible, the approach presented is based on the hypothesis that deposition takes place under nonstochastic conditions, such as those typical of many thin film processes in industry and technology. In this context, previous models for roughness replication, which are mainly based on idealised deposition conditions, cannot be applied and thus ad hoc approaches are required for achieving quantitative predictions. Here it is suggested that under nonstochastic conditions a phenomenological relation can be proposed, mainly based on local roughening of surface, to monitor the statistical similarity between the film and the substrate during growth or, in other words, to detect changes of the bare substrate morphological profile occurring during the film growth on top. Such approximation is based on surface representation in terms of power spectral density of surface heights, derived from topographic images; in this work, such method will be tested on two separate batches of synthetic images which simulate thin films growth onto a real rough substrate. In particular, two growth models will be implemented: the first reproduces the surface profile obtained during an atomic force microscopy measurement by using a simple geometrical envelope of surface, regardless the thin film growth mechanism; the second reproduces the columnar growth expected under nonstochastic deposition conditions. It will be shown that the approach introduced is capable to highlight differences between the two batches and, in the second case, to quantitatively account for the replication of the substrate roughness during growth. The results obtained here are potentially interesting in that they account essentially for the geometrical features of the surfaces, and as such they can be applied to synthetic depositions that reproduce different thin film depositions and experimental contexts. Thin film deposition onto rough surfaces is widespread among many industrial and technological applications such as photovoltaics, microelectronics, optics and biomedicine just to mention a few. In such cases, compared to substrate morphology, film deposition may be required to improve certain surface functionalities through roughening or smoothing of the pristine substrate morphology to accomplish different needs or applications. This raises a simple and legitimate question: how could the degree of replication of the substrate morphology after film deposition be determined? Quantitative approaches to this issue involve statistical descriptions of the two interfaces in terms of power spectral densities retrieved from scanning probe microscopy images of the surface. However, this requires an in-depth knowledge of the physics behind the process of film formation, leading to a complication in that models providing quantitative predictions for film conformality are based on ideal deposition conditions; thus, numerical results remained so far restricted to the case of atomically flat, and mostly unrealistic, surfaces. To tackle into this subject, an approximation is suggested that is based on phenomenological considerations and on the hypothesis that deposition is nonideal. On these premises, a simple conformality factor derived from a linear relation is introduced to relate the substrate and the evolving film morphology. Such approach is then applied to simulated atomic force microscopy images which describe the film growth onto a real substrate. Two models will be implemented: the first uses a simple geometrical envelope of the surface that uniquely matches with experiments without keeping into account the mechanism of growth, while the second reproduces the columnar growth expected under real deposition conditions. The application of conformality factors to the images so obtained shows that the second model accomplishes well to the final goal of obtaining quantitative results and enables to retrieve quantitative information especially in case of micro or nanometrically structured surfaces.

Autres résumés

Type: Publisher (fre)
Thin film deposition onto rough surfaces is widespread among many industrial and technological applications such as photovoltaics, microelectronics, optics and biomedicine just to mention a few. In such cases, compared to substrate morphology, film deposition may be required to improve certain surface functionalities through roughening or smoothing of the pristine substrate morphology to accomplish different needs or applications. This raises a simple and legitimate question: how could the degree of replication of the substrate morphology after film deposition be determined? Quantitative approaches to this issue involve statistical descriptions of the two interfaces in terms of power spectral densities retrieved from scanning probe microscopy images of the surface. However, this requires an in-depth knowledge of the physics behind the process of film formation, leading to a complication in that models providing quantitative predictions for film conformality are based on ideal deposition conditions; thus, numerical results remained so far restricted to the case of atomically flat, and mostly unrealistic, surfaces. To tackle into this subject, an approximation is suggested that is based on phenomenological considerations and on the hypothesis that deposition is nonideal. On these premises, a simple conformality factor derived from a linear relation is introduced to relate the substrate and the evolving film morphology. Such approach is then applied to simulated atomic force microscopy images which describe the film growth onto a real substrate. Two models will be implemented: the first uses a simple geometrical envelope of the surface that uniquely matches with experiments without keeping into account the mechanism of growth, while the second reproduces the columnar growth expected under real deposition conditions. The application of conformality factors to the images so obtained shows that the second model accomplishes well to the final goal of obtaining quantitative results and enables to retrieve quantitative information especially in case of micro or nanometrically structured surfaces.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32691852
doi: 10.1111/jmi.12942
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

270-279

Informations de copyright

© 2020 Royal Microscopical Society.

Références

Alsem, D.H., Xiang H., Ritchie, R.O. & Komvopoulos, K. (2012) Sidewall adhesion and sliding contact behavior of polycrystalline silicon microdevices operated in high vacuum. J. Microelectromech. Syst. 21(2), 359-369.
Asadchikov, V.E., Duparré, A., Jakobs, S., Karabekov, A.Y., Kozhevnikov, I.V. & Krivonosov, Y.S. (1999) Comparative study of the roughness of optical surfaces and thin films by use of x-ray scattering and atomic force microscopy. Appl. Optics 38, 684-691.
Babar, S., Li, T.T. & Abelson, J.R. (2014) Role of nucleation layer morphology in determining the statistical roughness of CVD grown thin films. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 32(6), 060601-1-060601-4.
Boi, M., Bianchi, M., Gambardella, A. et al. (2015) Tough and adhesive nanostructured calcium phosphate thin films deposited by the pulsed plasma deposition method. RSC Advances, 5(96), 78561-78571. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ra11034c.
Canestrari, R., Spiga, D. & Pareschi, G. (2006) Analysis of microroughness evolution in X-ray astronomical multilayer mirrors by surface topography with the MPES program and by X-ray scattering. Proceedings Volume 6266, P. Soc. Photo-Opt. Ins., 6266(626613), https://doi.org/10.1117/12.671861.
Chaffart, D. & Ricardez-Sandoval, L.A. (2018) Optimization and control of a thin film growth process: a hybrid first principles/artificial neural network based multiscale modelling approach. Comput. Chem. Eng. 119, 465-479.
Dash, P., Mallick, P., Rath, H. et al. (2009) Surface roughness and power spectral density study of SHI irradiated ultra-thin gold films. Appl. Surf. Sci. 256, 558-561.
Freitas, R.A. Jr. (2003) Nanomedicine, Volume IIA: Biocompatibility. Landes Bioscience, IIA Georgetown, TX.
Gambardella, A., Berni, M., Russo, A. & Bianchi, M. (2018) A comparative study of the growth dynamics of zirconia thin films deposited by ionized jet deposition onto different substrates. Surf. Coat. Technol. 337, 306-312.
Garnett, E.C., Brongersma, M.L., Cui, Y. & McGehee, M.D. (2011) Nanowire solar cells. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 41, 269-295.
Gowda, S.R., Reddy, A.L.M., Shaijumon, M.M., Zhan, X., Ci, L. & Ajayan, P.M. (2011) Conformal coating of thin polymer electrolyte layer on nanostructured electrode materials for three-dimensional battery applications. Nano Lett. 11(1), 101-106.
Herring, C. (1950) Effect of change of scale on sintering phenomena. J. Appl. Phys. 21, 301-303.
Jacobs, T., Junge, T. & Pastewka, L. (2017) Quantitative characterization of surface topography using spectral analysis. Surf. Topogr. Metrol. Prop. 5(1), 013001-013031.
Ji, X., Cheng, H.Y., Grede, A.J. et al. (2018) Conformal coating of amorphous silicon and germanium by high pressure chemical vapor deposition for photovoltaic fabrics. APL Mater. 6(4), 046105-1-046105-8.
Karabacak, T. (2011) Thin-film growth dynamics with shadowing and re-emission effects. J. Nanophotonics 5(1), 052501-1-052501-18.
Karabacak, T., Guclu, H. & Yuksel, M. (2009) Network behavior in thin-film growth dynamics. Phys. Rev. B 79, 195418-195429.
Karabacak, T., Wang, G.-C. & Lu, T.-M. (2003) Quasi-periodic nano-structures grown by oblique angle deposition. J. Appl. Phys. 94, 7723-7728.
Karunasiri, R.P.U., Bruinsma, R. & Rudnick, J. (1989) Thin-film growth and the shadow instability. Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 788-791.
Kimaev, G & Ricardez-Sandoval, L.A. (2017) A comparison of efficient uncertainty quantification techniques for stochastic multiscale systems. AIChE J. 63(8), 3361-3373.
Kimaev, G. & Ricardez-Sandoval, L.A. (2019) Nonlinear model predictive control of a multiscale thin film deposition process using artificial neural networks. Chem. Eng. Sci. 207, 1230-1245.
Kurtz, S.M. (2019) PEEK Biomaterials Handbook. William Andrew, https://doi.org/10.1016/C2016-0-02479-8.
Marchiori, G., Lopomo, N., Boi M. et al. (2016) Optimizing thickness of ceramic coatings on plastic components for orthopedic applications: a finite element analysis. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 58, 381-388.
Moore, C.S., Jewell, A.D., Nikzad, S. & France, K. (2016) Atomic Layer Deposited (ALD) coatings for future astronomical telescopes: recent developments. Proc. Spie. 99122U, 9912(99122U), https://doi.org/10.1117/12.671861.
Nečas, D. & Klapetek, P. (2012) Gwyddion: an open-source software for SPM data analysis. Centr. Eur. J. Phys. 10, 181-188.
Nečas, D. & Klapetek, P. (2013) One-dimensional autocorrelation and power spectrum density functions of irregular regions. Ultramicroscopy 124, 13-19.
Palomares, E., Clifford, J.N., Haque, S.A., Lutz, T. & Durrant, J.R. (2003) Control of charge recombination dynamics in dye sensitized solar cells by the use of conformally deposited metal oxide blocking layers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125(2), 475-482.
Patelli, A., Mussano, F., Brun, P. et al. (2018) Nanoroughness, surface chemistry, and drug delivery control by atmospheric plasma jet on implantable devices. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 10, 39512-39523.
Pelliccione, M. & Lu, T.M. (2008) Evolution of Thin Film Morphology, 1st edn. Springer, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-75109-2.
Peverini, L., Ziegler, E., Bigault, T. & Kozhevnikov, I. (2005) Roughness conformity during tungsten film growth: an in-situ synchrotron x-ray scattering study. Phys. Rev. B 72, 045445-1-045445-6.
Rasigni, G., Rasigni, M., Palmari, J., Dussert, C. & Varnier, F. (1988) Statistical parameters for random and pseudorandom rough surfaces. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 5, 99-103.
Rasoulian, S. & Ricardez-Sandoval, L.A. (2014) Uncertainty analysis and robust optimization of multiscale process systems with application to epitaxial thin film growth. Chem. Eng. Sci. 116, 590-600.
Rasoulian, S. & Ricardez-Sandoval, L.A. (2015) Robust multivariable estimation and control in an epitaxial thin film growth process under uncertainty. J. Process Control 34, 70-81.
Ricardez-Sandoval, L.A. (2011) Current challenges in the design and control of multiscale systems. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 89(6), 1324-1341.
Rönnow, D. (1997) Determination of interface roughness cross correlation of thin films from spectroscopic light scattering measurements. J. Appl. Phys. 81, 3627-3636.
Rönnow, D., Isidorsson, J. & Niklasson, G.A. (1996) Surface roughness of sputtered ZrO2 films studied by atomic force microscopy and spectroscopic light scattering. Phy. Rev. E 54, 4021-4026.
Schmitz, J. (2018) Low temperature thin films for next-generation microelectronics, Surf. Coat. Tech. 343, 83-88.
Smy, D., Vick, M.J., Brett, S.K., Dew, A.T., Wu, J.C., Sit J.C. & Harris, K.D. (2005) Three-dimensional simulation of film microstructure produced by glancing angle deposition. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 18, 2507-2512.
Sperling, B.A. & Abelson, J.R. (2004) Simultaneous short-range smoothening and global roughening during growth of hydrogenated amorphous silicon films. Appl. Phys. Lett. 85, 3456-3458.
Spiller, E.A., Baker, S.L., Parra, E. & Tarrio, C. (1999) Smoothing of mirror substrates by thin-film deposition. Proc. SPIE 3767, EUV, X-Ray, and Neutron Optics and Sources, 3767, https://doi.org/10.1117/12.371112.
Stearns, D.G. (1993) A stochastic model for thin film growth and erosion. Appl. Phys. Lett. 62, 1745-1747.
Stefanov, T., Maraka, H.V.R., Meagher, P., Rice, J., Sillekens, W. & Browne, D.J. (2020) Thin film metallic glass broad-spectrum mirror coatings for space telescope applications. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids: X, 7, 100050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nocx.2020.100050.
Stenzel, O. & Ohlídal, M. (2018) Optical Characterization of Thin Solid Films. Springer International Publishing, Cham.
Tong, W.M. & Williams, R. (1995) Kinetic of surface growth: phenomenology, scaling, and mechanisms of smoothening and roughening. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 45, 401-438.
Voronov, D.L., Anderson, E.H., Gullikson, E.M., Salmassi, F., Warwick, T., Yashchuk, V.V. & Padmore, H.A. (2013) Control of surface mobility for conformal deposition of Mo-Si multilayers on saw-tooth substrates. Appl. Surf. Sci. 284, 575-580.

Auteurs

M Bontempi (M)

Laboratorio di Biomeccanica e Innovazione Tecnologica, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via di Barbiano 1/10, Bologna, 40136, Italy.

A Visani (A)

Laboratorio di Biomeccanica e Innovazione Tecnologica, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via di Barbiano 1/10, Bologna, 40136, Italy.

M Benini (M)

Istituto per lo Studio dei Materiali Nanostrutturati, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Via Gobetti 101, Bologna, 40129, Italy.

A Gambardella (A)

Laboratorio di Biomeccanica e Innovazione Tecnologica, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via di Barbiano 1/10, Bologna, 40136, Italy.

Classifications MeSH