Direct and indirect CT imaging features of esophago-airway fistula in adults.

Imaging bronchoesophageal fistula esophago-airway fistula (EAF) radiology tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF)

Journal

Journal of thoracic disease
ISSN: 2072-1439
Titre abrégé: J Thorac Dis
Pays: China
ID NLM: 101533916

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2020
Historique:
entrez: 10 7 2020
pubmed: 10 7 2020
medline: 10 7 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Esophago-airway fistula (EAF) is an abnormal connection between the esophagus and the trachea or a major bronchus. While contrast esophagography remains the primary radiographic tool for the diagnosis of EAF, computed tomography (CT) is often employed in its evaluation. A systematic analysis of CT findings of EAF in adults has not been previously published. The goal of our study is to determine the direct and indirect CT findings of EAF in adults. We identified patients with EAF detected on CT at our institution between January 1, 2001 and December 31, 2019, with endoscopic or surgical confirmation. We collected patient clinicopathologic characteristics and assessed CTs for direct and indirect imaging features of EAF in these patients. Twenty-six patients (median age: 56 years; range, 25-79 years; F=13, 50% and M=13, 50%) with confirmed EAF were identified. Half of the patients had an underlying malignancy. On CT, a direct connection between the esophagus and the airway was identified in most cases (22/26; 85%). Common indirect CT findings of EAF included esophageal wall thickening (21/26, 81%), mediastinal fatty stranding (21/26, 81%), airway wall thickening (20/26, 77%), fluid or debris within the airways (17/26, 65%), and focal or diffuse esophageal dilation with air (17/26, 65%). Mediastinal fluid collections were infrequently seen (4/26, 15%), but findings of aspiration or other pneumonia were common (19/26, 73%). CT plays an essential role in both the primary and secondary evaluation of adult EAF resulting from both malignant and benign etiologies. CT may be the first diagnostic exam to suggest and detect the presence of EAF and may precede clinical suspicion, and it can detect a subset of fistulas not demonstrated on esophagography. There are several direct and indirect imaging findings on CT that can help in the detection of EAF.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Esophago-airway fistula (EAF) is an abnormal connection between the esophagus and the trachea or a major bronchus. While contrast esophagography remains the primary radiographic tool for the diagnosis of EAF, computed tomography (CT) is often employed in its evaluation. A systematic analysis of CT findings of EAF in adults has not been previously published. The goal of our study is to determine the direct and indirect CT findings of EAF in adults.
METHODS METHODS
We identified patients with EAF detected on CT at our institution between January 1, 2001 and December 31, 2019, with endoscopic or surgical confirmation. We collected patient clinicopathologic characteristics and assessed CTs for direct and indirect imaging features of EAF in these patients.
RESULTS RESULTS
Twenty-six patients (median age: 56 years; range, 25-79 years; F=13, 50% and M=13, 50%) with confirmed EAF were identified. Half of the patients had an underlying malignancy. On CT, a direct connection between the esophagus and the airway was identified in most cases (22/26; 85%). Common indirect CT findings of EAF included esophageal wall thickening (21/26, 81%), mediastinal fatty stranding (21/26, 81%), airway wall thickening (20/26, 77%), fluid or debris within the airways (17/26, 65%), and focal or diffuse esophageal dilation with air (17/26, 65%). Mediastinal fluid collections were infrequently seen (4/26, 15%), but findings of aspiration or other pneumonia were common (19/26, 73%).
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
CT plays an essential role in both the primary and secondary evaluation of adult EAF resulting from both malignant and benign etiologies. CT may be the first diagnostic exam to suggest and detect the presence of EAF and may precede clinical suspicion, and it can detect a subset of fistulas not demonstrated on esophagography. There are several direct and indirect imaging findings on CT that can help in the detection of EAF.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32642237
doi: 10.21037/jtd-20-244
pii: jtd-12-06-3157
pmc: PMC7330784
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

3157-3166

Informations de copyright

2020 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-20-244). BPL reports other from Elsevier, outside the submitted work. JB Ackman reports other from Elsevier, outside the submitted work. JAS reports other from Elsevier, outside the submitted work. SRD reports other from Merck, other from Pfizer, other from Bristol Mayer Squibb, other from Novartis, other from Roche, other from Polaris, other from Cascadian, other from Abbvie, other from Gradalis, other from Clinical Bay, other from Zai laboratories, other from Siemens Medical Solutions, outside the submitted work. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Références

J Pediatr Surg. 2013 Sep;48(9):1966-71
pubmed: 24074676
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018 Nov 15;13(1):113
pubmed: 30442164
Pediatr Surg Int. 2004 Oct;20(10):757-61
pubmed: 15517291
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008 Nov;34(5):1103-7
pubmed: 18678504
Chest Surg Clin N Am. 2003 May;13(2):271-89
pubmed: 12755313
J Am Coll Radiol. 2019 May;16(5S):S104-S115
pubmed: 31054737
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2005 Jul-Aug;34(4):167-9
pubmed: 16012488
Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Oct;102(4):1081-7
pubmed: 27329192
Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Apr;49(2):99-106
pubmed: 27066433
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017 Dec;154(6):e123
pubmed: 28916214
Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009 Nov;57(11):622-4
pubmed: 19908119
J Natl Med Assoc. 1988 Jul;80(7):817-8, 821
pubmed: 3404563
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017 Dec 1;52(6):1218-1222
pubmed: 28575191
Saudi Med J. 2011 Mar;32(3):305-7
pubmed: 21384069
Thorac Surg Clin. 2018 Aug;28(3):385-392
pubmed: 30054076
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1996;10(9):713-6
pubmed: 8905271
Ann Thorac Surg. 2013 Apr;95(4):1141-6
pubmed: 23000263
JAMA. 1966 Apr 11;196(2):117-22
pubmed: 5952106
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1985 Mar-Apr;9(2):302-4
pubmed: 3973154
Radiol Case Rep. 2015 Dec 07;3(2):126
pubmed: 27303515
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2006 Apr;6(4):581-93
pubmed: 16613545
World J Gastroenterol. 2006 Mar 7;12(9):1476-8
pubmed: 16552825
Chest. 1990 Jul;98(1):161-4
pubmed: 2361384
Trauma Case Rep. 2018 Sep 26;17:5-8
pubmed: 30310839
Pediatr Surg Int. 2012 Oct;28(10):961-6
pubmed: 22722826
Pediatr Radiol. 2017 Feb;47(2):154-160
pubmed: 27785539
Crit Care Med. 1986 Jun;14(6):591-2
pubmed: 3709203
Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2010 Jul;16(4):329-33
pubmed: 20531081
J Thorac Imaging. 2013 Mar;28(2):121-8
pubmed: 23059739
J Med Life. 2014 Oct-Dec;7(4):516-21
pubmed: 25713612
Ann Thorac Surg. 2002 Mar;73(3):911-5
pubmed: 11899200

Auteurs

Brent P Little (BP)

Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

Dexter P Mendoza (DP)

Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

Andrew Fox (A)

Department of Radiology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Carol C Wu (CC)

Department of Thoracic Imaging, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.

Jeanne B Ackman (JB)

Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

Jo-Anne Shepard (JA)

Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

Ashok Muniappan (A)

Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

Subba R Digumarthy (SR)

Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

Classifications MeSH