Monomethyl fumarate has better gastrointestinal tolerability profile compared with dimethyl fumarate.


Journal

Multiple sclerosis and related disorders
ISSN: 2211-0356
Titre abrégé: Mult Scler Relat Disord
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101580247

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Oct 2020
Historique:
received: 16 06 2020
accepted: 22 06 2020
pubmed: 7 7 2020
medline: 15 5 2021
entrez: 7 7 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Monomethyl fumarate (MMF) is the pharmacologically active metabolite of dimethyl fumarate (DMF). MMF formulated as Bafiertam™ 190 mg and DMF formulated as Tecfidera 240 mg deliver bioequivalent exposure of MMF and therefore possess the same efficacy/safety profiles. DMF is a widely used oral treatment for relapsing-remitting forms of multiple sclerosis (RRMS) but is limited in some patients, primarily female, by issues with gastrointestinal (GI) tolerability. This was a randomized, double-blind, head-to-head, 5-week study evaluating the GI tolerability of MMF 190 mg vs DMF 240 mg, administered twice daily in healthy subjects, using a derivative of the self-administered Modified Overall Gastrointestinal Symptom Scale (MOGISS). Subjects were stratified (3:1, female:male) and randomized (1:1) to the treatments. The primary endpoint was the Area Under the Curve (AUC) in each of the individual symptoms in the MOGISS over the 5-week treatment period. Other endpoints included the AUC over the 5-week treatment period in the MOGISS composite and total scores; duration and severity of GI events; Number and percentage of subjects reporting GI events during the overall treatment period, and assessment of safety/tolerability. Inferential analysis of the hierarchical testing of overall treatment differences in each MOGISS symptom AUC occurred in a predefined sequence starting with Abdominal Pain. For each symptom, LSMean AUC values were lower for MMF than DMF, however, the first primary endpoint, Abdominal Pain, was not statistically different between treatments; thus, all subsequent statistical analyses were considered exploratory. The side effects and safety profiles observed were consistent with the known profiles of DMF, with no new or unique safety concerns noted. Bafiertam showed an improved gastrointestinal tolerability profile compared with Tecfidera, with less severe GI events and fewer days of self-assessed GI symptoms, fewer GI adverse events, and lower discontinuation rates because of GI adverse events.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Monomethyl fumarate (MMF) is the pharmacologically active metabolite of dimethyl fumarate (DMF). MMF formulated as Bafiertam™ 190 mg and DMF formulated as Tecfidera 240 mg deliver bioequivalent exposure of MMF and therefore possess the same efficacy/safety profiles. DMF is a widely used oral treatment for relapsing-remitting forms of multiple sclerosis (RRMS) but is limited in some patients, primarily female, by issues with gastrointestinal (GI) tolerability.
METHODS METHODS
This was a randomized, double-blind, head-to-head, 5-week study evaluating the GI tolerability of MMF 190 mg vs DMF 240 mg, administered twice daily in healthy subjects, using a derivative of the self-administered Modified Overall Gastrointestinal Symptom Scale (MOGISS). Subjects were stratified (3:1, female:male) and randomized (1:1) to the treatments. The primary endpoint was the Area Under the Curve (AUC) in each of the individual symptoms in the MOGISS over the 5-week treatment period. Other endpoints included the AUC over the 5-week treatment period in the MOGISS composite and total scores; duration and severity of GI events; Number and percentage of subjects reporting GI events during the overall treatment period, and assessment of safety/tolerability.
RESULTS RESULTS
Inferential analysis of the hierarchical testing of overall treatment differences in each MOGISS symptom AUC occurred in a predefined sequence starting with Abdominal Pain. For each symptom, LSMean AUC values were lower for MMF than DMF, however, the first primary endpoint, Abdominal Pain, was not statistically different between treatments; thus, all subsequent statistical analyses were considered exploratory. The side effects and safety profiles observed were consistent with the known profiles of DMF, with no new or unique safety concerns noted.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Bafiertam showed an improved gastrointestinal tolerability profile compared with Tecfidera, with less severe GI events and fewer days of self-assessed GI symptoms, fewer GI adverse events, and lower discontinuation rates because of GI adverse events.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32629403
pii: S2211-0348(20)30411-9
doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2020.102335
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Fumarates 0
Immunosuppressive Agents 0
monomethyl fumarate 45IUB1PX8R
Dimethyl Fumarate FO2303MNI2

Types de publication

Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

102335

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 Banner Life Sciences LLC. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest Thomas W. Lategan, Tiffany N. Sprague, and Franck S. Rousseau are employees of Banner Life Sciences. Daniel Wynn and Edward J. Fox have paid consulting agreements with Banner Life Sciences.

Auteurs

Daniel Wynn (D)

Consultants in Neurology, Ltd, Northbrook, IL 60062, USA.

Thomas W Lategan (TW)

Banner Life Sciences, 3890 Premier Dr., Suite 110, High Point, NC 27265, USA. Electronic address: Lategan@bannerls.com.

Tiffany N Sprague (TN)

Banner Life Sciences, 3890 Premier Dr., Suite 110, High Point, NC 27265, USA.

Franck S Rousseau (FS)

Banner Life Sciences, 3890 Premier Dr., Suite 110, High Point, NC 27265, USA.

Edward J Fox (EJ)

Central Texas Neurology Consultants, Round Rock, TX 78681, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH