Assessment of genetically modified maize MON 87427 × MON 87460 × MON 89034 × MIR162 × NK603 and subcombinations, for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA-GMO-NL-2016-134).
GMO
MON 87427 × MON 87460 × MON 89034 × MIR162 × NK603
herbicide and drought tolerant and insect resistant
maize (Zea mays)
stack
Journal
EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority
ISSN: 1831-4732
Titre abrégé: EFSA J
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101642076
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2019
Aug 2019
Historique:
entrez:
7
7
2020
pubmed:
7
7
2020
medline:
7
7
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Maize MON 87427 ×MON 87460 × MON 89034 × MIR162 × NK603 (five-event stack maize) was produced by conventional crossing to combine five single events: MON 87427, MON 87460, MON 89034, MIR162 and NK603. The GMO Panel previously assessed the five single maize events and eleven of the subcombinations and did not identify safety concerns. No new data on the single maize events or the 11 subcombinations that could lead to modification of the original conclusions on their safety were identified. The molecular characterisation, comparative analysis (agronomic, phenotypic and compositional characteristics) and the outcome of the toxicological, allergenicity and nutritional assessment indicate that the combination of the single maize events and of the newly expressed proteins in the five-event stack maize does not give rise to food and feed safety and nutritional concerns. The GMO Panel concludes that the five-event stack maize, as described in this application, is as safe as and nutritionally equivalent to its non-GM comparator and the non-GM reference varieties tested. In the case of accidental release of viable grains of the five-event stack maize into the environment, this would not raise environmental safety concerns. The GMO Panel assessed the likelihood of interactions among the single events in the 14 maize subcombinations not previously assessed and concludes that these are expected to be as safe as and nutritionally equivalent to the single events, the previously assessed subcombinations and the five-event stack maize. The post-market environmental monitoring plan and reporting intervals are in line with the intended uses of the five-event stack maize. Post-market monitoring of food/feed is not considered necessary. The GMO Panel concludes that the five-event stack maize and its subcombinations are as safe as its non-GM comparator and the tested non-GM reference varieties with respect to potential effects on human and animal health and the environment.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32626404
doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5774
pii: EFS25774
pmc: PMC7009260
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e05774Informations de copyright
© 2019 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority.
Références
Toxins (Basel). 2017 Apr 07;9(4):
pubmed: 28387713
Environ Sci Eur. 2016;28(1):30
pubmed: 28090425
Sci Rep. 2017 May 8;7(1):1560
pubmed: 28484216
Front Plant Sci. 2015 Apr 29;6:283
pubmed: 25972882
Plant Cell. 1995 Jul;7(7):907-919
pubmed: 12242393
Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2016 Mar 02;80(2):329-50
pubmed: 26935135
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Aug;80(15):4803-7
pubmed: 6308651
Plant Cell Rep. 2000 Jul;19(8):798-803
pubmed: 30754872
Crit Rev Toxicol. 2013 Nov;43 Suppl 2:25-42
pubmed: 24164515
Arch Toxicol. 2019 Apr;93(4):1095-1139
pubmed: 30756133
Transgenic Res. 2009 Aug;18(4):583-94
pubmed: 19225900
Plant Physiol. 2008 Jun;147(2):446-55
pubmed: 18524876
Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1998 Sep;62(3):775-806
pubmed: 9729609
Scand J Immunol. 1999 Jun;49(6):578-84
pubmed: 10354369
J Biol Chem. 2002 Nov 29;277(48):46706-11
pubmed: 12324471
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002 Mar;68(3):1137-45
pubmed: 11872461
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 May 28;93(11):5389-94
pubmed: 8643585
J Bacteriol. 1967 Nov;94(5):1492-6
pubmed: 4862193
Sci Transl Med. 2010 Jul 21;2(41):41ra51
pubmed: 20650871
J Biol Chem. 2002 Mar 1;277(9):7239-45
pubmed: 11756430
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007 Feb;73(3):956-61
pubmed: 17122403