The Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2022 - handbook for qualified systematic reviews.
Nordic and Baltic countries
dietary reference values
evidence-based nutrition
food-based dietary guidelines
national food and health authorities
nutrient recommendations
systematic reviews
Journal
Food & nutrition research
ISSN: 1654-661X
Titre abrégé: Food Nutr Res
Pays: Sweden
ID NLM: 101488795
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
11
02
2020
revised:
18
04
2020
accepted:
18
04
2020
entrez:
3
7
2020
pubmed:
3
7
2020
medline:
3
7
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Systematic reviews (SRs) constitute a major part of the Nordic Nutrition Recommendations (NNRs). The step-by-step procedure used to develop SRs has evolved considerably over time and is often tailored to fit the exposure and outcomes in focus. To describe a detailed procedure for developing qualified SRs commissioned by the NNR2022 project. Scrutinizing procedures of recent SRs commissioned by leading national food and health authorities or international food and health organizations. The following eight steps must be included when developing qualified SRs for the NNR2022 project: 1) define research question, 2) protocol development, 3) literature search, 4) screening and selection of studies, 5) data extraction, 6) assessing risk of bias, 7) synthesis and grading of total strength of evidence, and 8) reporting according to certain standards. This guide is based on the guidelines developed for the fifth edition of NNR but includes some important new domains in order to adhere to more recent, authoritative standards. All qualified SRs in the NNR2022 project will follow the protocol described here.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Systematic reviews (SRs) constitute a major part of the Nordic Nutrition Recommendations (NNRs). The step-by-step procedure used to develop SRs has evolved considerably over time and is often tailored to fit the exposure and outcomes in focus.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
To describe a detailed procedure for developing qualified SRs commissioned by the NNR2022 project.
DESIGN
METHODS
Scrutinizing procedures of recent SRs commissioned by leading national food and health authorities or international food and health organizations.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The following eight steps must be included when developing qualified SRs for the NNR2022 project: 1) define research question, 2) protocol development, 3) literature search, 4) screening and selection of studies, 5) data extraction, 6) assessing risk of bias, 7) synthesis and grading of total strength of evidence, and 8) reporting according to certain standards.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
This guide is based on the guidelines developed for the fifth edition of NNR but includes some important new domains in order to adhere to more recent, authoritative standards.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
All qualified SRs in the NNR2022 project will follow the protocol described here.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32612492
doi: 10.29219/fnr.v64.4404
pii: 4404
pmc: PMC7307435
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Informations de copyright
© 2020 Erik Kristoffer Arnesen et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
See sections on “Conflicts of interest” and “Sponsors of the NNR2022 project” in the main text of the companion article (1).
Références
J Clin Epidemiol. 2018 May;97:26-34
pubmed: 29248724
PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097
pubmed: 19621072
Am J Clin Nutr. 2017 Jan;105(1):249S-285S
pubmed: 27927637
BMJ. 2015 Jan 02;350:g7647
pubmed: 25555855
BMJ. 2017 Sep 21;358:j4008
pubmed: 28935701
PLoS Med. 2016 Jun 07;13(6):e1002036
pubmed: 27270749
BMJ. 2016 Oct 12;355:i4919
pubmed: 27733354
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Nov;64(11):1178-86
pubmed: 21636246
J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Nov;68(11):1312-24
pubmed: 25721570
Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 01;4:1
pubmed: 25554246
Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 5;5(1):210
pubmed: 27919275
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Nov;64(11):1168-77
pubmed: 21684115
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 5;13(7):e0197425
pubmed: 29975705
Food Nutr Res. 2012;56:
pubmed: 22893781
Epidemiology. 2007 Nov;18(6):805-35
pubmed: 18049195
Proc R Soc Med. 1965 May;58:295-300
pubmed: 14283879
PLoS Med. 2019 Feb 21;16(2):e1002742
pubmed: 30789892
JAMA. 2000 Apr 19;283(15):2008-12
pubmed: 10789670