Argentinian clinical practice guideline for surveillance, diagnosis, staging and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.
Algorithms
Argentina
Biopsy
/ standards
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular
/ diagnostic imaging
Clinical Decision-Making
Consensus
Decision Support Techniques
Evidence-Based Medicine
/ standards
Humans
Liver Neoplasms
/ diagnostic imaging
Medical Oncology
/ standards
Neoplasm Staging
/ standards
Predictive Value of Tests
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
Treatment Outcome
Ultrasonography
/ standards
Argentina
Latin America
Liver cancer
Practice guideline
Journal
Annals of hepatology
ISSN: 1665-2681
Titre abrégé: Ann Hepatol
Pays: Mexico
ID NLM: 101155885
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
received:
25
04
2020
revised:
05
06
2020
accepted:
10
06
2020
pubmed:
1
7
2020
medline:
24
8
2021
entrez:
29
6
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The A.A.E.E.H has developed this guideline for the best care of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from Argentina. It was done from May 2018 to March 2020. Specific clinical research questions were systematically searched. The quality of evidence and level of recommendations were organized according to GRADE. HCC surveillance is strongly recommended with abdominal ultrasound (US) every six months in the population at risk for HCC (cirrhosis, hepatitis B or hepatitis C); it is suggested to add alpha-feto protein (AFP) levels in case of inexeperienced sonographers. Imaging diagnosis in patients at risk for HCC has high specificity and tumor biopsy is not mandatory. The Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer algorithm is strongly recommended for HCC staging and treatment-decision processes. Liver resection is strongly recommended for patients without portal hypertension and preserved liver function. Composite models are suggested for liver transplant selection criteria. Therapies for HCC with robust clinical evidence include transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and first to second line systemic treatment options (sorafenib, lenvatinib, regorafenib, cabozantinib and ramucirumab). Immunotherapy with nivolumab and pembrolizumab has failed to show statistical benefit but the novel combination of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab has recently shown survival benefit over sorafenib in frontline.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32593747
pii: S1665-2681(20)30063-6
doi: 10.1016/j.aohep.2020.06.003
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Practice Guideline
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
546-569Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Fundación Clínica Médica Sur, A.C. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.