Comparative genomics of four strains of the edible brown alga, Cladosiphon okamuranus.
Aquaculture
Cladosiphon strains
Genome decoding
Pan-genome
Sets of genes
Sub-speciation
Journal
BMC genomics
ISSN: 1471-2164
Titre abrégé: BMC Genomics
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100965258
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
26 Jun 2020
26 Jun 2020
Historique:
received:
06
03
2020
accepted:
21
05
2020
entrez:
27
6
2020
pubmed:
27
6
2020
medline:
30
1
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The brown alga, Cladosiphon okamuranus (Okinawa mozuku), is one of the most important edible seaweeds, and it is cultivated for market primarily in Okinawa, Japan. Four strains, denominated S, K, O, and C, with distinctively different morphologies, have been cultivated commercially since the early 2000s. We previously reported a draft genome of the S-strain. To facilitate studies of seaweed biology for future aquaculture, we here decoded and analyzed genomes of the other three strains (K, O, and C). Here we improved the genome of the S-strain (ver. 2, 130 Mbp, 12,999 genes), and decoded the K-strain (135 Mbp, 12,511 genes), the O-strain (140 Mbp, 12,548 genes), and the C-strain (143 Mbp, 12,182 genes). Molecular phylogenies, using mitochondrial and nuclear genes, showed that the S-strain diverged first, followed by the K-strain, and most recently the C- and O-strains. Comparisons of genome architecture among the four strains document the frequent occurrence of inversions. In addition to gene acquisitions and losses, the S-, K-, O-, and C-strains possess 457, 344, 367, and 262 gene families unique to each strain, respectively. Comprehensive Blast searches showed that most genes have no sequence similarity to any entries in the non-redundant protein sequence database, although GO annotation suggested that they likely function in relation to molecular and biological processes and cellular components. Our study compares the genomes of four strains of C. okamuranus and examines their phylogenetic relationships. Due to global environmental changes, including temperature increases, acidification, and pollution, brown algal aquaculture is facing critical challenges. Genomic and phylogenetic information reported by the present research provides useful tools for isolation of novel strains.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The brown alga, Cladosiphon okamuranus (Okinawa mozuku), is one of the most important edible seaweeds, and it is cultivated for market primarily in Okinawa, Japan. Four strains, denominated S, K, O, and C, with distinctively different morphologies, have been cultivated commercially since the early 2000s. We previously reported a draft genome of the S-strain. To facilitate studies of seaweed biology for future aquaculture, we here decoded and analyzed genomes of the other three strains (K, O, and C).
RESULTS
RESULTS
Here we improved the genome of the S-strain (ver. 2, 130 Mbp, 12,999 genes), and decoded the K-strain (135 Mbp, 12,511 genes), the O-strain (140 Mbp, 12,548 genes), and the C-strain (143 Mbp, 12,182 genes). Molecular phylogenies, using mitochondrial and nuclear genes, showed that the S-strain diverged first, followed by the K-strain, and most recently the C- and O-strains. Comparisons of genome architecture among the four strains document the frequent occurrence of inversions. In addition to gene acquisitions and losses, the S-, K-, O-, and C-strains possess 457, 344, 367, and 262 gene families unique to each strain, respectively. Comprehensive Blast searches showed that most genes have no sequence similarity to any entries in the non-redundant protein sequence database, although GO annotation suggested that they likely function in relation to molecular and biological processes and cellular components.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Our study compares the genomes of four strains of C. okamuranus and examines their phylogenetic relationships. Due to global environmental changes, including temperature increases, acidification, and pollution, brown algal aquaculture is facing critical challenges. Genomic and phylogenetic information reported by the present research provides useful tools for isolation of novel strains.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32586267
doi: 10.1186/s12864-020-06792-8
pii: 10.1186/s12864-020-06792-8
pmc: PMC7318753
doi:
Substances chimiques
Mitochondrial Proteins
0
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
422Références
Trends Plant Sci. 2006 Apr;11(4):165-6
pubmed: 16530460
BMC Genomics. 2018 Jun 14;19(1):458
pubmed: 29898658
Bioinformatics. 2005 Jun;21 Suppl 1:i351-8
pubmed: 15961478
Genome Res. 2008 May;18(5):821-9
pubmed: 18349386
Nature. 2010 Jan 21;463(7279):311-7
pubmed: 20010809
Genome Res. 2014 Aug;24(8):1384-95
pubmed: 24755901
Bioinformatics. 2017 Aug 15;33(16):2577-2579
pubmed: 28407147
DNA Res. 2014;21(2):169-81
pubmed: 24282021
Bioinformatics. 2011 Feb 15;27(4):578-9
pubmed: 21149342
New Phytol. 2017 Apr;214(1):219-232
pubmed: 27870061
Bioinformatics. 2017 Jul 15;33(14):2202-2204
pubmed: 28369201
Nucleic Acids Res. 2002 Jul 15;30(14):3059-66
pubmed: 12136088
Bioinformatics. 2008 Mar 1;24(5):637-44
pubmed: 18218656
Nat Commun. 2020 Feb 20;11(1):989
pubmed: 32080174
Bioinformatics. 2014 May 1;30(9):1236-40
pubmed: 24451626
Cytogenet Genome Res. 2005;110(1-4):462-7
pubmed: 16093699
Bioinformatics. 2014 Aug 1;30(15):2114-20
pubmed: 24695404
Nat Plants. 2020 Feb;6(2):107-118
pubmed: 32042158
Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 1999;63(10):1813-5
pubmed: 26300174
Bioinformatics. 2014 May 1;30(9):1312-3
pubmed: 24451623
Source Code Biol Med. 2013 Nov 22;8(1):23
pubmed: 24267787
Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2006 Dec;16(6):545-52
pubmed: 17055251
Nucleic Acids Res. 2017 Feb 28;45(4):e18
pubmed: 28204566
Nucleic Acids Res. 2003 Oct 1;31(19):5654-66
pubmed: 14500829
Bioinformatics. 2007 May 1;23(9):1061-7
pubmed: 17332020
Nat Commun. 2015 Apr 24;6:6986
pubmed: 25908475
DNA Res. 2016 Dec;23(6):561-570
pubmed: 27501718
Plant J. 2016 Oct;88(2):159-178
pubmed: 27436134
PeerJ. 2018 Jun 4;6:e4958
pubmed: 29888139
Sci Rep. 2019 Mar 14;9(1):4607
pubmed: 30872679
Nucleic Acids Res. 2006 Jan 1;34(Database issue):D247-51
pubmed: 16381856
Nucleic Acids Res. 2012 Jan;40(2):e11
pubmed: 22102584
Genome Res. 2009 Sep;19(9):1630-8
pubmed: 19570905
Bioinformatics. 2012 Apr 15;28(8):1086-92
pubmed: 22368243
Front Genet. 2019 May 02;10:378
pubmed: 31118944
Microbiome. 2014 Aug 01;2:26
pubmed: 25136443
Bioinformatics. 1998;14(9):755-63
pubmed: 9918945
PLoS One. 2009 Sep 14;4(9):e6978
pubmed: 19750009
Nature. 2008 Nov 13;456(7219):239-44
pubmed: 18923393
Bioinformatics. 2009 Aug 1;25(15):1972-3
pubmed: 19505945
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Aug 5;111(31):11407-12
pubmed: 25049384
Bioinformatics. 2011 Mar 15;27(6):764-70
pubmed: 21217122
Nature. 2010 Jun 3;465(7298):617-21
pubmed: 20520714
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1988 Nov;32(11):1742-5
pubmed: 2472775
PeerJ. 2017 Oct 31;5:e3982
pubmed: 29104828
Genome Biol. 2015 Aug 06;16:157
pubmed: 26243257
BMC Bioinformatics. 2009 Dec 15;10:421
pubmed: 20003500
Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35(9):3100-8
pubmed: 17452365