Evaluation of deep convolutional neural networks for automatic classification of common maternal fetal ultrasound planes.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
23 06 2020
23 06 2020
Historique:
received:
25
09
2019
accepted:
01
06
2020
entrez:
25
6
2020
pubmed:
25
6
2020
medline:
1
12
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The goal of this study was to evaluate the maturity of current Deep Learning classification techniques for their application in a real maternal-fetal clinical environment. A large dataset of routinely acquired maternal-fetal screening ultrasound images (which will be made publicly available) was collected from two different hospitals by several operators and ultrasound machines. All images were manually labeled by an expert maternal fetal clinician. Images were divided into 6 classes: four of the most widely used fetal anatomical planes (Abdomen, Brain, Femur and Thorax), the mother's cervix (widely used for prematurity screening) and a general category to include any other less common image plane. Fetal brain images were further categorized into the 3 most common fetal brain planes (Trans-thalamic, Trans-cerebellum, Trans-ventricular) to judge fine grain categorization performance. The final dataset is comprised of over 12,400 images from 1,792 patients, making it the largest ultrasound dataset to date. We then evaluated a wide variety of state-of-the-art deep Convolutional Neural Networks on this dataset and analyzed results in depth, comparing the computational models to research technicians, which are the ones currently performing the task daily. Results indicate for the first time that computational models have similar performance compared to humans when classifying common planes in human fetal examination. However, the dataset leaves the door open on future research to further improve results, especially on fine-grained plane categorization.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32576905
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-67076-5
pii: 10.1038/s41598-020-67076-5
pmc: PMC7311420
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
10200Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Références
Sci Transl Med. 2018 Dec 12;10(471):
pubmed: 30541791
Lancet. 2015 Nov 21;386(10008):2089-2097
pubmed: 26360240
Semin Perinatol. 2008 Aug;32(4):274-80
pubmed: 18652928
Nature. 2015 May 28;521(7553):436-44
pubmed: 26017442
J Digit Imaging. 2017 Apr;30(2):234-243
pubmed: 27896451
Sci Transl Med. 2012 Oct 31;4(158):158rv11
pubmed: 23115356
Br Med J. 1973 Oct 6;4(5883):28-31
pubmed: 4755210
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Mar;45(3):358-62
pubmed: 25632014
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985 Feb 1;151(3):333-7
pubmed: 3881966
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2017 Nov;36(11):2204-2215
pubmed: 28708546
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Nov;207(5):374.e1-6
pubmed: 23107079
Nat Rev Cancer. 2018 Aug;18(8):500-510
pubmed: 29777175
Nature. 2017 Feb 2;542(7639):115-118
pubmed: 28117445
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jan;37(1):116-26
pubmed: 20842655
Fetal Diagn Ther. 2014;36(2):86-98
pubmed: 24457811
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 May;51(5):637-643
pubmed: 28508418
Sci Rep. 2019 Feb 13;9(1):1950
pubmed: 30760806
Med Image Anal. 2017 Dec;42:60-88
pubmed: 28778026
Med Image Anal. 2017 Apr;37:22-36
pubmed: 28104551