Caesarean birth by maternal request: a poorly understood phenomenon in low- and middle-income countries.
caesarean birth
low- and middle-income countries
maternal request
risk factors
trends
Journal
International health
ISSN: 1876-3405
Titre abrégé: Int Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101517095
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 01 2021
14 01 2021
Historique:
received:
28
10
2019
revised:
05
12
2019
accepted:
08
04
2020
pubmed:
2
6
2020
medline:
3
6
2021
entrez:
2
6
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
While trends in caesarean birth by maternal request in low- and middle-income countries are unclear, age, education, multiple gestation and hypertensive disease appear associated with the indication when compared with caesarean birth performed for medical indications. We performed a secondary analysis of a prospectively collected population-based study of home and facility births using descriptive statistics, bivariate comparisons and multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression. Of 28 751 patients who underwent caesarean birth and had a documented primary indication for the surgery, 655 (2%) were attributed to caesarean birth by maternal request. The remaining 98% were attributed to maternal and foetal indications and prior caesarean birth. In a multilevel mixed effects logistic regression adjusted for site and cluster of birth, when compared with caesareans performed for medical indications, caesarean birth performed for maternal request had a higher odds of being performed among women ≥35 y of age, with a university or higher level of education, with multiple gestations and with pregnancies complicated by hypertension (P < 0.01). Caesarean birth by maternal request was associated with a two-times increased odds of breastfeeding within 1 h of delivery, but no adverse outcomes (when compared with women who underwent caesarean birth for medical indications; P < 0.01). Caesarean performed by maternal request is more common in older and more educated women and those with multifoetal gestation or hypertensive disease. It is also associated with higher rates of breastfeeding within 1 h of delivery.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
While trends in caesarean birth by maternal request in low- and middle-income countries are unclear, age, education, multiple gestation and hypertensive disease appear associated with the indication when compared with caesarean birth performed for medical indications.
METHODS
We performed a secondary analysis of a prospectively collected population-based study of home and facility births using descriptive statistics, bivariate comparisons and multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression.
RESULTS
Of 28 751 patients who underwent caesarean birth and had a documented primary indication for the surgery, 655 (2%) were attributed to caesarean birth by maternal request. The remaining 98% were attributed to maternal and foetal indications and prior caesarean birth. In a multilevel mixed effects logistic regression adjusted for site and cluster of birth, when compared with caesareans performed for medical indications, caesarean birth performed for maternal request had a higher odds of being performed among women ≥35 y of age, with a university or higher level of education, with multiple gestations and with pregnancies complicated by hypertension (P < 0.01). Caesarean birth by maternal request was associated with a two-times increased odds of breastfeeding within 1 h of delivery, but no adverse outcomes (when compared with women who underwent caesarean birth for medical indications; P < 0.01).
CONCLUSION
Caesarean performed by maternal request is more common in older and more educated women and those with multifoetal gestation or hypertensive disease. It is also associated with higher rates of breastfeeding within 1 h of delivery.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32478383
pii: 5849425
doi: 10.1093/inthealth/ihaa020
pmc: PMC7807237
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
63-69Subventions
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : UG1 HD076461
Pays : United States
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : UG1 HD078439
Pays : United States
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : UG1 HD076465
Pays : United States
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : UG1 HD076457
Pays : United States
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : UG1 HD076474
Pays : United States
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : K12 HD001271
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.
Références
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Mar 1;2(3):e190526
pubmed: 30901040
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 05;11(2):e0148343
pubmed: 26849801
BJOG. 2014 Mar;121 Suppl 1:14-24
pubmed: 24641531
Ginekol Pol. 2016;87(6):426-30
pubmed: 27418219
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020 Nov;33(22):3867-3872
pubmed: 30810436
Lancet. 2018 Oct 13;392(10155):1358-1368
pubmed: 30322586
BMJ. 2018 Jan 24;360:k55
pubmed: 29367432
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017 Apr;96(4):410-420
pubmed: 28107771
BJOG. 2016 Apr;123(5):667-70
pubmed: 26681211
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2015 Jul 20;112(29-30):489-95
pubmed: 26249251
J Hum Lact. 2018 Aug;34(3):526-534
pubmed: 29365288
Reprod Health. 2015;12 Suppl 2:S1
pubmed: 26063166
N Engl J Med. 2013 Oct 3;369(14):1295-305
pubmed: 24088091
Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jan;133(1):1
pubmed: 30575675
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jun;212(6):817.e1-9
pubmed: 25640048
Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jan;133(1):e73-e77
pubmed: 30575678