Implementing the Clean Clinic Approach Improves Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Quality in Health Facilities in the Western Highlands of Guatemala.
Journal
Global health, science and practice
ISSN: 2169-575X
Titre abrégé: Glob Health Sci Pract
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101624414
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 06 2020
30 06 2020
Historique:
received:
26
11
2019
accepted:
04
03
2020
pubmed:
23
5
2020
medline:
19
5
2021
entrez:
23
5
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) services are cornerstones to providing safe health care services and improving patient satisfaction and care seeking. The Clean Clinic Approach (CCA) uses a 10-step process to support health care facilities (HCFs) in making incremental, effective cleanliness and infection prevention and control (IPC) improvements, without relying on external investments. We piloted the CCA in Guatemala and assessed the extent to which it contributed to quality improvements in WASH for IPC. After developing an assessment tool tailored to the Guatemalan context, we assessed 11 HCFs in 8 technical areas and scored the facilities on 79 criteria with a total of 100 points. We conducted a baseline assessment (September to October 2018), second assessment (January 2019), and final assessment (February to March 2019). The 11 HCFs improved their average emergency/general ward scores from 41 points at baseline to 87 points at end line, based on a 100-point scale. For delivery wards, the scores increased from 50 to 91 points and for postnatal wards from 46 to 90 points. The CCA process and tools facilitated a systematic way for HCFs to identify, prioritize, make, and measure WASH quality of care improvements. Training facility staff was fundamental to improving quality standards, and involving medical and administration staff in joint analysis, coordination, and planning sessions was key to integration and teamwork. Further work is needed to increase involvement of local government and community members and to further adapt the process and tools.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) services are cornerstones to providing safe health care services and improving patient satisfaction and care seeking. The Clean Clinic Approach (CCA) uses a 10-step process to support health care facilities (HCFs) in making incremental, effective cleanliness and infection prevention and control (IPC) improvements, without relying on external investments. We piloted the CCA in Guatemala and assessed the extent to which it contributed to quality improvements in WASH for IPC.
METHODS
After developing an assessment tool tailored to the Guatemalan context, we assessed 11 HCFs in 8 technical areas and scored the facilities on 79 criteria with a total of 100 points. We conducted a baseline assessment (September to October 2018), second assessment (January 2019), and final assessment (February to March 2019).
RESULTS
The 11 HCFs improved their average emergency/general ward scores from 41 points at baseline to 87 points at end line, based on a 100-point scale. For delivery wards, the scores increased from 50 to 91 points and for postnatal wards from 46 to 90 points.
CONCLUSIONS
The CCA process and tools facilitated a systematic way for HCFs to identify, prioritize, make, and measure WASH quality of care improvements. Training facility staff was fundamental to improving quality standards, and involving medical and administration staff in joint analysis, coordination, and planning sessions was key to integration and teamwork. Further work is needed to increase involvement of local government and community members and to further adapt the process and tools.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32439715
pii: GHSP-D-19-00413
doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-19-00413
pmc: PMC7326526
doi:
Substances chimiques
Water
059QF0KO0R
Types de publication
Evaluation Study
Journal Article
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
256-269Informations de copyright
© Lopez et al.
Références
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Dec;25(12):986-992
pubmed: 26369893
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2018 Apr;221(3):409-422
pubmed: 29352706
Salud Publica Mex. 2006 May-Jun;48(3):183-92
pubmed: 16813126
BMJ Glob Health. 2018 May 9;3(3):e000648
pubmed: 29765776
Lancet. 2016 Jan 9;387(10014):176-87
pubmed: 26603922
Mayo Clin Proc. 2007 Jun;82(6):735-9
pubmed: 17550754
Lancet. 2011 Jan 15;377(9761):228-41
pubmed: 21146207
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1998 Feb;19(2):125-35
pubmed: 9510113