Fibrinolysis and the Influence of Tranexamic Acid Dosing in Cardiac Surgery.

The present study aimed to determine whether underlying disease, performed surgery, and dose of tranexamic acid influence fibrinolysis measured with D-dimer levels. Retrospective analysis. Single institution (Department of Cardiac Surgery and Section of Clinical Hemostaseology at the Düsseldorf University Hospital). The study comprised 3,152 adult patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery between February 2013 and October 2016. Two doses of tranexamic acid during surgery were administered. D-dimer levels were analyzed at the start of surgery and before protamine administration. D-dimer levels at the start of surgery were compared according to disease. Intraoperative D-dimer development was analyzed according to the type of surgery and within 2 cohorts with different tranexamic acid doses. Interindividual variability was pronounced for D-dimer levels at the start of surgery, with significant differences among patients with coronary artery disease, valve disease, and aortic disease and patients undergoing heart transplantation compared with patients receiving a left ventricular assist device (p < 0.01). Aortic dissection, endocarditis, and extracorporeal life support were associated with higher D-dimer levels (p ≤ 0.01). With tranexamic acid at a fixed dose, intraoperative D-dimer levels decreased in on-pump and off-pump coronary bypass surgery, valve surgery, and left ventricular assist device surgery (p ≤ 0.02), but levels increased in aortic surgery and heart transplantations (p < 0.01). A decrease or increase in D-dimer levels during surgery was influenced significantly by a higher or lower tranexamic acid dose (p ≤ 0.01). D-dimer testing allows for the assessment of individual fibrinolytic activity in cardiac surgery, which is influenced by disease type, surgery type, and dose of tranexamic acid. The assessment of the fibrinolytic status may have the potential to facilitate dose-adjusted antifibrinolytic therapy in the future.

Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Conflict of Interest The authors declare no competing interests.