Scaling up malaria elimination management and leadership: a pilot in three provinces in Zimbabwe, 2016-2018.
Capacity building
Challenges
Leadership
Malaria elimination
Operations
Programme management
Service delivery
Zimbabwe
Journal
Malaria journal
ISSN: 1475-2875
Titre abrégé: Malar J
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101139802
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
20 May 2020
20 May 2020
Historique:
received:
16
01
2020
accepted:
08
05
2020
entrez:
22
5
2020
pubmed:
22
5
2020
medline:
6
1
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Focus for improved malaria programme performance is often placed on the technical challenges, while operational issues are neglected. Many of the operational challenges that inhibit malaria programme effectiveness can be addressed by improving communication and coordination, increasing accountability, maintaining motivation, providing adequate training and supervision, and removing bureaucratic silos. A programme of work was piloted in Zimbabwe with one malaria eliminating province, Matabeleland South in 2016-2017, and scaled up to include two other provinces, Matabeleland North and Midlands, in 2017-2018. The intervention included participatory, organization development and quality improvement methods. Workshop participants in Matabeleland South reported an improvement in data management. In Matabeleland North, motivation among nurses improved as they gained confidence in case management from training, and overall staff morale improved. There was also an improvement in data quality and data sharing. In Midlands, the poorly performing district was motivated to improve, and both participating districts became more goal-oriented. They also became more focused on monitoring their data regularly. Participants from all provinces reported having gained skills in listening, communicating, facilitating discussions, and making presentations. Participation in the intervention changed the mindset of malaria programme staff, increasing ownership and accountability, and empowering them to identify and solve problems, make decisions, and act within their sphere of influence, elevating challenges when appropriate. This pilot demonstrates that a participatory, organization development and quality improvement approach has broad ranging effects, including improving local delivery of interventions, tailoring strategies to target specific populations, finding efficiencies in the system that could not be found using the traditional top-down approach, and improving motivation and communication between different cadres of health workers. Scale-up of this simple model can be achieved and benefits sustained over time if the process is imbedded into the programme with the training of health staff who can serve as management improvement coaches. Methods to improve operational performance that are scalable at the district level are urgently needed: this approach is a possible tactic that can significantly contribute to the achievement of global malaria eradication goals.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Focus for improved malaria programme performance is often placed on the technical challenges, while operational issues are neglected. Many of the operational challenges that inhibit malaria programme effectiveness can be addressed by improving communication and coordination, increasing accountability, maintaining motivation, providing adequate training and supervision, and removing bureaucratic silos.
METHODS
METHODS
A programme of work was piloted in Zimbabwe with one malaria eliminating province, Matabeleland South in 2016-2017, and scaled up to include two other provinces, Matabeleland North and Midlands, in 2017-2018. The intervention included participatory, organization development and quality improvement methods.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Workshop participants in Matabeleland South reported an improvement in data management. In Matabeleland North, motivation among nurses improved as they gained confidence in case management from training, and overall staff morale improved. There was also an improvement in data quality and data sharing. In Midlands, the poorly performing district was motivated to improve, and both participating districts became more goal-oriented. They also became more focused on monitoring their data regularly. Participants from all provinces reported having gained skills in listening, communicating, facilitating discussions, and making presentations. Participation in the intervention changed the mindset of malaria programme staff, increasing ownership and accountability, and empowering them to identify and solve problems, make decisions, and act within their sphere of influence, elevating challenges when appropriate.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
This pilot demonstrates that a participatory, organization development and quality improvement approach has broad ranging effects, including improving local delivery of interventions, tailoring strategies to target specific populations, finding efficiencies in the system that could not be found using the traditional top-down approach, and improving motivation and communication between different cadres of health workers. Scale-up of this simple model can be achieved and benefits sustained over time if the process is imbedded into the programme with the training of health staff who can serve as management improvement coaches. Methods to improve operational performance that are scalable at the district level are urgently needed: this approach is a possible tactic that can significantly contribute to the achievement of global malaria eradication goals.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32434584
doi: 10.1186/s12936-020-03255-z
pii: 10.1186/s12936-020-03255-z
pmc: PMC7238623
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
185Subventions
Organisme : Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
ID : OPP1160129
Références
Lancet. 2010 Nov 6;376(9752):1592-603
pubmed: 21035841
Malar J. 2018 Jan 25;17(1):51
pubmed: 29370810
Malar J. 2019 Sep 23;18(1):323
pubmed: 31547809
Malar J. 2016 Sep 22;15(1):488
pubmed: 27659770
PLoS Med. 2017 Nov 30;14(11):e1002456
pubmed: 29190300
Malar J. 2018 Apr 3;17(1):146
pubmed: 29615043
BMC Public Health. 2015 Apr 10;15:352
pubmed: 25885211
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2015 Jul;93(1):135-138
pubmed: 26013372
Lancet. 2019 Sep 21;394(10203):1056-1112
pubmed: 31511196