Performances of stabilization/solidification process of acid mine drainage passive treatment residues: Assessment of the environmental and mechanical behaviors.
Alternative binders
Leaching
Mine waste
Sludge management
Stabilization/solidification
Journal
Journal of environmental management
ISSN: 1095-8630
Titre abrégé: J Environ Manage
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0401664
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Sep 2020
01 Sep 2020
Historique:
received:
27
11
2019
revised:
14
04
2020
accepted:
11
05
2020
pubmed:
20
5
2020
medline:
24
6
2020
entrez:
20
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Residues from passive treatment of acid mine drainage (AMD) have variable chemical stability and could regenerate contaminated drainage. Stabilization/solidification (S/S) can prevent contaminant leaching. Residues were collected from a tri-step AMD field passive treatment system, operated for 6 years at the reclaimed Lorraine mine site, Quebec, Canada. General Use Portland cement (GU), blended binders based on GU with pozzolanic additives (ground-granulated blast-furnace slag; GGBFS and fly ash type C; FAC) were used as hydraulic binders, in proportions (w/w %) of 100GU, 20GU/80GGBFS, and 50GU/50FAC, respectively. Residues were mixed with wood ash (35%) and sand (25%), while reference samples (100% sand) were also prepared. Prior to S/S, raw materials were characterized. The S/S effectiveness was assessed mineralogically and mechanically (unconfined compressive strength; UCS). Environmental behavior assessment (static vs semi-dynamic leaching tests) was also performed. UCS results showed that strength increase with age. At 56 days, GU- (1.3 MPa) and GU/GGBFS (0.7 MPa) satisfied Quebec's strength requirements for landfill disposal (0.7 MPa), but not GU/FAC (0.6 MPa), while all samples satisfied USEPA criteria (0.35 MPa). The semi-dynamic test showed that all elements can be immobilized successfully in GU- and GU/GGBFS. The GU binder had the best stabilizing performance. Based on USEPA requirements, S/S using GU, GGBFS, and FAC can be also considered for contaminant immobilization in AMD passive treatment residues. Finally, the comparison between replicates using Student's t-test indicated good reproducibility of S/S treatment.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32425169
pii: S0301-4797(20)30696-4
doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110764
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Coal Ash
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
110764Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of competing interest None.