Performances of stabilization/solidification process of acid mine drainage passive treatment residues: Assessment of the environmental and mechanical behaviors.

Alternative binders Leaching Mine waste Sludge management Stabilization/solidification

Journal

Journal of environmental management
ISSN: 1095-8630
Titre abrégé: J Environ Manage
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0401664

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 Sep 2020
Historique:
received: 27 11 2019
revised: 14 04 2020
accepted: 11 05 2020
pubmed: 20 5 2020
medline: 24 6 2020
entrez: 20 5 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Residues from passive treatment of acid mine drainage (AMD) have variable chemical stability and could regenerate contaminated drainage. Stabilization/solidification (S/S) can prevent contaminant leaching. Residues were collected from a tri-step AMD field passive treatment system, operated for 6 years at the reclaimed Lorraine mine site, Quebec, Canada. General Use Portland cement (GU), blended binders based on GU with pozzolanic additives (ground-granulated blast-furnace slag; GGBFS and fly ash type C; FAC) were used as hydraulic binders, in proportions (w/w %) of 100GU, 20GU/80GGBFS, and 50GU/50FAC, respectively. Residues were mixed with wood ash (35%) and sand (25%), while reference samples (100% sand) were also prepared. Prior to S/S, raw materials were characterized. The S/S effectiveness was assessed mineralogically and mechanically (unconfined compressive strength; UCS). Environmental behavior assessment (static vs semi-dynamic leaching tests) was also performed. UCS results showed that strength increase with age. At 56 days, GU- (1.3 MPa) and GU/GGBFS (0.7 MPa) satisfied Quebec's strength requirements for landfill disposal (0.7 MPa), but not GU/FAC (0.6 MPa), while all samples satisfied USEPA criteria (0.35 MPa). The semi-dynamic test showed that all elements can be immobilized successfully in GU- and GU/GGBFS. The GU binder had the best stabilizing performance. Based on USEPA requirements, S/S using GU, GGBFS, and FAC can be also considered for contaminant immobilization in AMD passive treatment residues. Finally, the comparison between replicates using Student's t-test indicated good reproducibility of S/S treatment.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32425169
pii: S0301-4797(20)30696-4
doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110764
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Coal Ash 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

110764

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest None.

Auteurs

Marouen Jouini (M)

Research Institute on Mines and Environment (RIME), University of Québec in Abitibi-Témiscamingue (UQAT), Canada.

Mostafa Benzaazoua (M)

Research Institute on Mines and Environment (RIME), University of Québec in Abitibi-Témiscamingue (UQAT), Canada.

Carmen Mihaela Neculita (CM)

Research Institute on Mines and Environment (RIME), University of Québec in Abitibi-Témiscamingue (UQAT), Canada. Electronic address: Carmen-Mihaela.Neculita@uqat.ca.

Thomas Genty (T)

Research Institute on Mines and Environment (RIME), University of Québec in Abitibi-Témiscamingue (UQAT), Canada.

Articles similaires

Humans Middle Aged Female Male Surveys and Questionnaires
Adolescent Child Female Humans Male
Humans Scoliosis Mobile Applications Retrospective Studies Artificial Intelligence

Classifications MeSH