Multiplex Ventilation: A Simulation-Based Study of Ventilating 2 Patients With a Single Ventilator.


Journal

Respiratory care
ISSN: 1943-3654
Titre abrégé: Respir Care
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7510357

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 2020
Historique:
pubmed: 30 4 2020
medline: 16 7 2020
entrez: 30 4 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The overwhelming demand for mechanical ventilators due to COVID-19 has stimulated interest in using one ventilator for multiple patients (ie, multiplex ventilation). Despite a plethora of information on the internet, there is little supporting evidence and no human studies. The risk of multiplex ventilation is that ventilation and PEEP effects are largely uncontrollable and depend on the difference between patients' resistance and compliance. It is not clear whether volume control ventilation or pressure control ventilation is safer or more effective. We designed a simulation-based study to allow complete control over the relevant variables to determine the effects of various degrees of resistance-compliance imbalance on tidal volume (V Two separate breathing simulators were ventilated with a ventilator using pressure control and volume control ventilation modes. Evidence-based lung models simulated a range of differences in resistance and compliance (6 pairs of simulated patients). Differences in V Depending on differences in resistance and compliance, differences in V These experiments confirmed the potential for markedly different ventilation and oxygenation for patients with uneven respiratory system impedances during multiplex ventilation. Three critical problems must be solved to minimize risk: (1) partitioning of inspiratory flow from the ventilator individually between the 2 patients, (2) measurement of V

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
The overwhelming demand for mechanical ventilators due to COVID-19 has stimulated interest in using one ventilator for multiple patients (ie, multiplex ventilation). Despite a plethora of information on the internet, there is little supporting evidence and no human studies. The risk of multiplex ventilation is that ventilation and PEEP effects are largely uncontrollable and depend on the difference between patients' resistance and compliance. It is not clear whether volume control ventilation or pressure control ventilation is safer or more effective. We designed a simulation-based study to allow complete control over the relevant variables to determine the effects of various degrees of resistance-compliance imbalance on tidal volume (V
METHODS
Two separate breathing simulators were ventilated with a ventilator using pressure control and volume control ventilation modes. Evidence-based lung models simulated a range of differences in resistance and compliance (6 pairs of simulated patients). Differences in V
RESULTS
Depending on differences in resistance and compliance, differences in V
CONCLUSIONS
These experiments confirmed the potential for markedly different ventilation and oxygenation for patients with uneven respiratory system impedances during multiplex ventilation. Three critical problems must be solved to minimize risk: (1) partitioning of inspiratory flow from the ventilator individually between the 2 patients, (2) measurement of V

Identifiants

pubmed: 32345741
pii: respcare.07882
doi: 10.4187/respcare.07882
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

920-931

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 by Daedalus Enterprises.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Mr Chatburn has disclosed relationships with IngMar Medical, and Vyaire Medical. Mr Branson has disclosed relationships with Mallinckrodt, Ventec Life Systems, and Zoll Medical Corporation. Dr Hatipoğlu has disclosed no conflicts of interest.

Auteurs

Robert L Chatburn (RL)

Department of Respiratory Therapy, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio. chatbur@ccf.org.

Richard D Branson (RD)

Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio.

Umur Hatipoğlu (U)

Department of Critical Care Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH