Multiplex Ventilation: A Simulation-Based Study of Ventilating 2 Patients With a Single Ventilator.
Airway Resistance
/ physiology
Betacoronavirus
COVID-19
Computer Simulation
Coronavirus Infections
/ epidemiology
Critical Care
/ methods
Equipment Design
Humans
Lung Compliance
/ physiology
Materials Testing
/ methods
Models, Biological
Pandemics
Pneumonia, Viral
/ epidemiology
Respiration, Artificial
/ instrumentation
SARS-CoV-2
Ventilators, Mechanical
/ standards
disaster medicine
mechanical ventilation
ventilator modes
Journal
Respiratory care
ISSN: 1943-3654
Titre abrégé: Respir Care
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7510357
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2020
07 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
30
4
2020
medline:
16
7
2020
entrez:
30
4
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The overwhelming demand for mechanical ventilators due to COVID-19 has stimulated interest in using one ventilator for multiple patients (ie, multiplex ventilation). Despite a plethora of information on the internet, there is little supporting evidence and no human studies. The risk of multiplex ventilation is that ventilation and PEEP effects are largely uncontrollable and depend on the difference between patients' resistance and compliance. It is not clear whether volume control ventilation or pressure control ventilation is safer or more effective. We designed a simulation-based study to allow complete control over the relevant variables to determine the effects of various degrees of resistance-compliance imbalance on tidal volume (V Two separate breathing simulators were ventilated with a ventilator using pressure control and volume control ventilation modes. Evidence-based lung models simulated a range of differences in resistance and compliance (6 pairs of simulated patients). Differences in V Depending on differences in resistance and compliance, differences in V These experiments confirmed the potential for markedly different ventilation and oxygenation for patients with uneven respiratory system impedances during multiplex ventilation. Three critical problems must be solved to minimize risk: (1) partitioning of inspiratory flow from the ventilator individually between the 2 patients, (2) measurement of V
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The overwhelming demand for mechanical ventilators due to COVID-19 has stimulated interest in using one ventilator for multiple patients (ie, multiplex ventilation). Despite a plethora of information on the internet, there is little supporting evidence and no human studies. The risk of multiplex ventilation is that ventilation and PEEP effects are largely uncontrollable and depend on the difference between patients' resistance and compliance. It is not clear whether volume control ventilation or pressure control ventilation is safer or more effective. We designed a simulation-based study to allow complete control over the relevant variables to determine the effects of various degrees of resistance-compliance imbalance on tidal volume (V
METHODS
Two separate breathing simulators were ventilated with a ventilator using pressure control and volume control ventilation modes. Evidence-based lung models simulated a range of differences in resistance and compliance (6 pairs of simulated patients). Differences in V
RESULTS
Depending on differences in resistance and compliance, differences in V
CONCLUSIONS
These experiments confirmed the potential for markedly different ventilation and oxygenation for patients with uneven respiratory system impedances during multiplex ventilation. Three critical problems must be solved to minimize risk: (1) partitioning of inspiratory flow from the ventilator individually between the 2 patients, (2) measurement of V
Identifiants
pubmed: 32345741
pii: respcare.07882
doi: 10.4187/respcare.07882
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
920-931Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 by Daedalus Enterprises.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Mr Chatburn has disclosed relationships with IngMar Medical, and Vyaire Medical. Mr Branson has disclosed relationships with Mallinckrodt, Ventec Life Systems, and Zoll Medical Corporation. Dr Hatipoğlu has disclosed no conflicts of interest.