Diagnostic accuracy of an automated chemiluminescent immunoassay for anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG antibodies: an Italian experience.
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Antibodies, Viral
/ blood
Automation, Laboratory
COVID-19
/ diagnosis
Female
Humans
Immunoassay
/ methods
Immunoglobulin G
/ blood
Immunoglobulin M
/ blood
Luminescent Measurements
/ methods
Male
Middle Aged
ROC Curve
Reproducibility of Results
SARS-CoV-2
/ immunology
Sensitivity and Specificity
SARS coronavirus
coronavirus
humoral immunity
immune responses
virus classification
Journal
Journal of medical virology
ISSN: 1096-9071
Titre abrégé: J Med Virol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7705876
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2020
Sep 2020
Historique:
received:
18
04
2020
revised:
22
04
2020
accepted:
23
04
2020
pubmed:
25
4
2020
medline:
29
12
2020
entrez:
25
4
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
A pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has been spreading throughout the world. Though molecular diagnostic tests are the gold standard for COVID-19, serological testing is emerging as a potential surveillance tool, in addition to its complementary role in COVID-19 diagnostics. Indubitably quantitative serological testing provides greater advantages than qualitative tests but today there is still little known about serological diagnostics and what the most appropriate role quantitative tests might play. Sixty-one COVID-19 patients and 64 patients from a control group were tested by iFlash1800 CLIA analyzer for anti-SARS CoV-2 antibodies IgM and IgG. All COVID-19 patients were hospitalized in San Giovanni di Dio Hospital (Florence, Italy) and had a positive oro/nasopharyngeal swab reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction result. The highest sensitivity with a very good specificity performance was reached at a cutoff value of 10.0 AU/mL for IgM and of 7.1 for IgG antibodies, hence near to the manufacturer's cutoff values of 10 AU/mL for both isotypes. The receiver operating characteristic curves showed area under the curve values of 0.918 and 0.980 for anti-SARS CoV-2 antibodies IgM and IgG, respectively. iFlash1800 CLIA analyzer has shown highly accurate results for the anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies profile and can be considered an excellent tool for COVID-19 diagnostics.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32330291
doi: 10.1002/jmv.25932
pmc: PMC7264663
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibodies, Viral
0
Immunoglobulin G
0
Immunoglobulin M
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1671-1675Informations de copyright
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Références
N Engl J Med. 2020 Mar 26;382(13):1199-1207
pubmed: 31995857
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020 Jun 25;58(7):1156-1159
pubmed: 32301750
J Med Virol. 2020 Oct;92(10):1724-1727
pubmed: 32227490
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020 Jun 25;58(7):1081-1088
pubmed: 32301749
J Med Virol. 2020 Sep;92(9):1518-1524
pubmed: 32104917
J Med Virol. 2020 Sep;92(9):1671-1675
pubmed: 32330291
Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol. 2020 Mar;38(1):1-9
pubmed: 32105090
J Med Virol. 2020 Oct;92(10):2050-2054
pubmed: 32383183
Int J Infect Dis. 2020 May;94:49-52
pubmed: 32251798
Lancet. 2020 Feb 22;395(10224):565-574
pubmed: 32007145
Isr Med Assoc J. 2020 Apr;22(4):203-210
pubmed: 32286019
Clin Chem. 2020 May 1;66(5):664-666
pubmed: 32077933