When will I get my paper back? A replication study of publication timelines for health professions education research.


Journal

Perspectives on medical education
ISSN: 2212-277X
Titre abrégé: Perspect Med Educ
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101590643

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 2020
Historique:
pubmed: 23 4 2020
medline: 23 3 2021
entrez: 23 4 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Biomedical researchers have lamented the lengthy timelines from manuscript submission to publication and highlighted potential detrimental effects on scientific progress and scientists' careers. In 2015, Himmelstein identified the mean time from manuscript submission to acceptance in biomedicine as approximately 100 days. The length of publication timelines in health professions education (HPE) is currently unknown. This study replicates Himmelstein's work with a sample of 14 HPE journals published between 2008-2018. Using PubMed, 19,182 article citations were retrieved. Open metadata for each were downloaded, including the date the article was received by the journal, date the authors resubmitted revisions, date the journal accepted the article, and date of entry into PubMed. Journals without publication history metadata were excluded. Publication history data were available for 55% (n = 8) of the journals sampled. The publication histories of 4,735 (25%) articles were analyzed. Mean time from: (1) author submission to journal acceptance was 180.93 days (SD = 103.89), (2) author submission to posting on PubMed was 263.55 days (SD = 157.61), and (3) journal acceptance to posting on PubMed was 83.15 days (SD = 135.72). This study presents publication metadata for journals that openly provide it-a first step towards understanding publication timelines in HPE. Findings confirm the replicability of the original study, and the limited data suggest that, in comparison to biomedical scientists broadly, medical educators may experience longer wait times for article acceptance and publication. Reasons for these delays are currently unknown and deserve further study; such work would be facilitated by increased public access to journal metadata.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32319046
doi: 10.1007/s40037-020-00576-2
pii: 10.1007/s40037-020-00576-2
pmc: PMC7283407
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

139-146

Références

Palese A, Coletti S, Dante A. Publication efficiency among the higher impact factor nursing journals in 2009: a retrospective analysis. Int J Nurs Stud. 2013;50:543–51.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.08.019
Powell K. Does it take too long to publish research? Natue News. 2016;530:148.
doi: 10.1038/530148a
Qunaj L, Jain RH, Atoria CL, Gennarelli RL, Miller JE, Bach PB. Delays in publication of important clinical trial findings in oncology. JAMA Oncol. 2018;4:e180264.
doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.0264
Lauer MS, Krumholz HM, Topol EJ. Time for a prepublication culture in clinical research? Lancet. 2015;386:2447–9.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01177-0
Vale RD. Accelerating scientific publication in biology. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112:13439–46.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1511912112
Vaidyanathan G. No paper, no PhD? India rethinks graduate student policy. Nature Index. 2019. https://www.natureindex.com/news-blog/india-rethinks-graduate-student-policy . Accessed 4 Sept 2019.
Björk B‑C, Solomon D. The publishing delay in scholarly peer-reviewed journals. J Informetrics. 2013;7:914–23.
doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2013.09.001
Calcagno V, Demoinet E, Gollner K, Guidi L, Ruths D, de Mazancourt C. Flows of research manuscripts among scientific journals reveal hidden submission patterns. Science. 2012;338:1065–9.
doi: 10.1126/science.1227833
Himmelstein D. The history of publishing delays. Satoshi Village: the blog of Daniel Himmelstein. 2016. https://blog.dhimmel.com/history-of-delays/ . Accessed 4 Sept 2019.
Sebo P, Fournier JP, Ragot C, Gorioux P‑H, Herrmann FR, Maisonneuve H. Factors associated with publication speed in general medical journals: a retrospective study of bibliometric data. Scientometrics. 2019;119:1–22.
doi: 10.1007/s11192-019-03061-8
Swanwick T. Chapter 1: Understanding medical education. In: Swanwick T, Forrest K, O’Brien BC, editors. Understanding medical education: evidence, theory and practice. 2nd ed. London: Wiley-Blackwell; 2013. pp. 1–6.
doi: 10.1002/9781118472361
Huisman J, Smits J. Duration and quality of the peer review process: the author’s perspective. Scientometrics. 2017;113:633–50.
doi: 10.1007/s11192-017-2310-5
Maggio LA, Leroux TC, Meyer HS, Artino AR Jr. #MedEd: exploring the relationship between altmetrics and traditional measures of dissemination in health professions education. Perspect Med Educ. 2018;7:239–47.
doi: 10.1007/s40037-018-0438-5
Lee K, Whelan JS, Tannery NH, Kanter SL, Peters AS. 50 years of publication in the field of medical education. Med Teach. 2013;35:591–8.
doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2013.786168
Miguel E, Camerer C, Casey K, et al. Promoting transparency in social science research. Science. 2014;343:30–1.
doi: 10.1126/science.1245317
Nosek BA, Alter G, Banks GC, et al. Promoting an open research culture. Science. 2015;348:1422–5.
doi: 10.1126/science.aab2374
Tekian A. Doctoral programs in health professions education. Med Teach. 2014;36:73–81.
doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2013.847913
Reed DA, Cook DA, Beckman TJ, Levine RB, Kern DE, Wright SM. Association between funding and quality of published medical education research. JAMA. 2007;298:1002–9.
doi: 10.1001/jama.298.9.1002
Maggio LA, Artino AR, Driessen EW. Preprints: facilitating early discover, access, and feedback. Perspect Med Educ. 2018;7:287–9.
doi: 10.1007/s40037-018-0451-8
Fu DY, Hughery JJ. Releasing a preprint is associated with more attention and citations. bioRxiv 699652. 2019. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/699652v1 . Accessed 4 Sept 2019.
Norman G. Good news, bad news. Adv in Health Sci Educ. 2018;23:1–5.
doi: 10.1007/s10459-018-9810-9
Maggio LA, Driessen EW. Perspective on Medical Education: three changes in our guidelines to make authors’ and reviewers’ lives easier. Perspect Med Educ. 2020;1:1–2.
doi: 10.1007/s40037-020-00563-7
eLife. eLIFE author instructions. 2019. https://submit.elifesciences.org/html/elife_author_instructions.html#metrics . Accessed 4 Sept 2019.

Auteurs

Lauren A Maggio (LA)

Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA. Lauren.maggio@usuhs.edu.

William E Bynum (WE)

Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.

Deanna N Schreiber-Gregory (DN)

Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA.

Steven J Durning (SJ)

Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA.

Anthony R Artino (AR)

Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH