Effect of probiotics on gut microbiome in patients with administration of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis: A randomized controlled study.
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Anti-Bacterial Agents
/ adverse effects
Antibiotic Prophylaxis
/ adverse effects
Cefazolin
/ adverse effects
Diarrhea
/ chemically induced
Drug Therapy, Combination
Enterococcus faecium
/ isolation & purification
Feces
/ microbiology
Female
Gastrointestinal Microbiome
/ drug effects
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Probiotics
/ administration & dosage
Prospective Studies
Spine
/ surgery
Vancomycin
/ adverse effects
Antibiotics
Microbiome
Probiotics
Prophylaxis
Surgery
Journal
Journal of infection and chemotherapy : official journal of the Japan Society of Chemotherapy
ISSN: 1437-7780
Titre abrégé: J Infect Chemother
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9608375
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2020
Aug 2020
Historique:
received:
16
01
2020
revised:
18
02
2020
accepted:
10
03
2020
pubmed:
15
4
2020
medline:
21
10
2020
entrez:
15
4
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Surgical antibiotic prophylaxis (SAP) is recommended for the prevention of surgical site infections. However, there is a concern about adverse effects of SAP, such as antibiotic-associated diarrhea (AAD). To prevent AAD, administration of probiotics has been investigated. Although recent advances in next-generation sequencing makes it possible to analyze the gut microbiome, the effect of probiotics on the gut microbiome in the patients with SAP remains unknown. To test a hypothesis that SAP influences the gut microbiome and probiotics prevent the influence, a randomized controlled study was conducted with patients who underwent spinal surgery at Nagasaki University Hospital. After obtaining informed consent, the patients were automatically classified into the non-probiotics group and the probiotics group. In the probiotics group, the patients took 1 g of Enterococcus faecium 129 BIO 3B-R, 3 times a day on postoperative days (PODs) 1-5. The feces of all patients were sampled before administration of SAP and on PODs 5 and 10. We compared alpha and beta diversity and differential abundance analysis of the gut microbiome before and after SAP. During the study period, a total of 33 patients were evaluated, comprising 17 patients in the non-probiotics group and 16 in the probiotics group. There was no significant difference between the groups regarding patient characteristics. In alpha and beta diversity, there were no significant differences among all combinations. In differential abundance analysis at operational taxonomic unit level, Streptococcus gallolyticus and Roseburia were significantly increased in the non-probiotics group and significantly decreased in the probiotics group.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32284181
pii: S1341-321X(20)30097-0
doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2020.03.008
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anti-Bacterial Agents
0
Vancomycin
6Q205EH1VU
Cefazolin
IHS69L0Y4T
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
795-801Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Japanese Society of Chemotherapy and The Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest Kaku N and Yanagihara K received lecture fee from Biofermin Pharmaceutical Ltd (Kobe, Hyogo, Japan). Matsumoto N, Sasaki D, Tsuda K, Kosai K, Uno N, Morinaga Y, Tagami A, Adachi S, and Hasegawa H declare no potential conflict of interest.