Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Neonatal Brain Image Segmentation.
T2-weighed MRI
brain segmentation
convolutional neural network
machine learning (artificial intelligence)
neonatal brain
Journal
Frontiers in neuroscience
ISSN: 1662-4548
Titre abrégé: Front Neurosci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101478481
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
22
08
2019
accepted:
25
02
2020
entrez:
11
4
2020
pubmed:
11
4
2020
medline:
11
4
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Deep learning neural networks are especially potent at dealing with structured data, such as images and volumes. Both modified LiviaNET and HyperDense-Net performed well at a prior competition segmenting 6-month-old infant magnetic resonance images, but neonatal cerebral tissue type identification is challenging given its uniquely inverted tissue contrasts. The current study aims to evaluate the two architectures to segment neonatal brain tissue types at term equivalent age. Both networks were retrained over 24 pairs of neonatal T1 and T2 data from the Developing Human Connectome Project public data set and validated on another eight pairs against ground truth. We then reported the best-performing model from training and its performance by computing the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) for each tissue type against eight test subjects. During the testing phase, among the segmentation approaches tested, the dual-modality HyperDense-Net achieved the best statistically significantly test mean DSC values, obtaining 0.94/0.95/0.92 for the tissue types and took 80 h to train and 10 min to segment, including preprocessing. The single-modality LiviaNET was better at processing T2-weighted images than processing T1-weighted images across all tissue types, achieving mean DSC values of 0.90/0.90/0.88 for gray matter, white matter, and cerebrospinal fluid, respectively, while requiring 30 h to train and 8 min to segment each brain, including preprocessing. Our evaluation demonstrates that both neural networks can segment neonatal brains, achieving previously reported performance. Both networks will be continuously retrained over an increasingly larger repertoire of neonatal brain data and be made available through the Canadian Neonatal Brain Platform to better serve the neonatal brain imaging research community.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32273836
doi: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00207
pmc: PMC7114297
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
207Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Ding, Acosta, Enguix, Suffren, Ortmann, Luck, Dolz and Lodygensky.
Références
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2019 May;38(5):1116-1126
pubmed: 30387726
PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e44596
pubmed: 23049751
Neuroimage. 2018 Apr 15;170:446-455
pubmed: 28445774
Radiographics. 2010 May;30(3):763-80
pubmed: 20462993
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2016 May;35(5):1252-1261
pubmed: 27046893
Neuroimage. 2012 Nov 15;63(3):1038-53
pubmed: 22884937
J Digit Imaging. 2017 Aug;30(4):449-459
pubmed: 28577131
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2010 Jun;29(6):1310-20
pubmed: 20378467
Med Image Anal. 2005 Oct;9(5):457-66
pubmed: 16019252
Neuroimage. 2017 Feb 15;147:841-851
pubmed: 27725314
Neuroimage. 2018 Apr 15;170:456-470
pubmed: 28450139
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2014 Sep;33(9):1818-31
pubmed: 24816548
Neuroimage. 2009 Aug 15;47(2):564-72
pubmed: 19409502
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2019 Feb 27;:
pubmed: 30835215
Hum Brain Mapp. 2002 Nov;17(3):143-55
pubmed: 12391568
Front Neuroinform. 2016 Mar 29;10:12
pubmed: 27065840
Med Image Anal. 2017 Dec;42:60-88
pubmed: 28778026
Neuroimage. 2015 Mar;108:214-24
pubmed: 25562829
Neuroimage. 2012 Sep;62(3):1499-509
pubmed: 22713673
Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2020 Jan;79:101660
pubmed: 31785402