Influence of sodium chlorate, ferulic acid, and essential oils on Escherichia coli and porcine fecal microbiota.
essential oils
ferulic acid
pathogenic microorganisms
porcine fecal
sodium chlorate
Journal
Journal of animal science
ISSN: 1525-3163
Titre abrégé: J Anim Sci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8003002
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Mar 2020
01 Mar 2020
Historique:
received:
03
10
2019
accepted:
14
02
2020
pubmed:
18
2
2020
medline:
19
8
2020
entrez:
18
2
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The influence of sodium chlorate (SC), ferulic acid (FA), and essential oils (EO) was examined on the survivability of two porcine diarrhetic enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) strains (F18 and K88) and populations of porcine fecal bacteria. Fecal bacterial populations were examined by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) and identification by 16S gene sequencing. The treatments were control (no additives), 10 mM SC, 2.5 mg FA /mL, a 1.5% vol/vol solution of an EO mixture as well as mixtures of EO + SC, EO + FA, and FA + SC at each of the aforementioned concentrations. EO were a commercial blend of oregano oil and cinnamon oil with water and citric acid. Freshly collected porcine feces in half-strength Mueller Hinton broth was inoculated with E. coli F18 (Trial 1) or E. coli K88 (Trial 2). The fecal-E. coli suspensions were transferred to crimp top tubes preloaded with the treatment compounds. Quantitative enumeration was at 0, 6, and 24 h. All treatments reduced (P < 0.05) the counts of E. coli F18 at 6 and 24 h. With the exception of similarity coefficient (%SC), all the other treatments reduced (P < 0.05) the K88 counts at 24 h. The most effective treatments to reduce the F18 and K88 CFU numbers were those containing EO. Results of DGGE revealed that Dice percentage similarity coefficients (%SC) of bacterial profiles among treatment groups varied from 81.3% to 100%SC. The results of gene sequencing showed that, except for SC at 24 h, all the other treatments reduced the counts of the family Enterobacteriaceae, while Lactobacillaceae and Ruminococcaceae increased and Clostridiaceae decreased in all treatments. In conclusion, all treatments were effective in reducing the ETEC, but EO mixture was the most effective. The porcine microbial communities may be influenced by the studied treatments.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32064520
pii: 5739119
doi: 10.1093/jas/skaa059
pmc: PMC7072035
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Chlorates
0
Coumaric Acids
0
Oils, Volatile
0
Plant Oils
0
ferulic acid
AVM951ZWST
sodium chlorate
T95DR77GMR
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Références
J Food Prot. 2003 Feb;66(2):194-9
pubmed: 12597476
J Adv Pharm Technol Res. 2019 Apr-Jun;10(2):63-67
pubmed: 31041184
J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng. 2019;54(7):608-616
pubmed: 30821189
Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2004 Spring;1(1):59-63
pubmed: 15992263
Microb Drug Resist. 2013 Aug;19(4):256-65
pubmed: 23480526
J Anim Sci. 2004 Feb;82(2):397-404
pubmed: 14974536
BMC Complement Altern Med. 2006 Nov 30;6:39
pubmed: 17134518
Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2012 Aug;25(8):1178-83
pubmed: 25049678
J Appl Microbiol. 2006 Feb;100(2):296-305
pubmed: 16430506
J Food Prot. 2016 Feb;79(2):299-303
pubmed: 26818992
Animals (Basel). 2018 Sep 19;8(9):
pubmed: 30235792
Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 1998 Jan;73(1):127-41
pubmed: 9602286
J Food Prot. 2007 Feb;70(2):308-15
pubmed: 17340863
Int J Food Microbiol. 2001 Dec 30;71(2-3):125-30
pubmed: 11789929
J Food Prot. 2014 Sep;77(9):1588-92
pubmed: 25198852
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006 Jul;72(7):5069-72
pubmed: 16820507
J Anim Sci. 2012 Jan;90(1):381-6
pubmed: 21803976
Lett Appl Microbiol. 2017 Mar;64(3):192-197
pubmed: 28063174
ISME J. 2012 Mar;6(3):610-8
pubmed: 22134646
Poult Sci. 2003 Jul;82(7):1100-7
pubmed: 12872965
Pathogens. 2019 Jan 28;8(1):
pubmed: 30696051
J Environ Sci Health B. 2014;49(12):966-70
pubmed: 25310812
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002 Feb;68(2):673-90
pubmed: 11823207
Nat Methods. 2010 May;7(5):335-6
pubmed: 20383131
J Food Prot. 2001 Feb;64(2):255-8
pubmed: 11271777
PLoS One. 2015 Feb 17;10(2):e0117441
pubmed: 25688558