Acute effects of JUUL and IQOS in cigarette smokers.
addiction
electronic nicotine delivery devices
non-cigarette tobacco products
Journal
Tobacco control
ISSN: 1468-3318
Titre abrégé: Tob Control
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9209612
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 Feb 2020
10 Feb 2020
Historique:
received:
23
10
2019
revised:
18
12
2019
accepted:
07
01
2020
entrez:
12
2
2020
pubmed:
12
2
2020
medline:
12
2
2020
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
JUUL is an electronic cigarette that aerosolises a nicotine-containing liquid, while IQOS heats tobacco to produce an aerosol. Both are marketed to smokers, but their effects have seldom been examined in this population. Eighteen cigarette smokers (13 men) with no JUUL or IQOS experience completed a within-subject, laboratory study assessing nicotine delivery and subjective effects after controlled (10 puffs, ~30 s interpuff interval) and ad libitum (90 min) use of JUUL, IQOS or own-brand (OB) cigarettes. JUUL increased mean plasma nicotine concentration significantly from 2.2 (SD=0.7) ng/mL to 9.8 (4.9) ng/mL after 10 puffs and to 11.5 (9.3) ng/mL after ad libitum use. IQOS increased mean plasma nicotine significantly from 2.1 (0.2) ng/mL to 12.7 (6.2) ng/mL after 10 puffs and to 11.3 (8.0) ng/mL after ad libitum use. OB increased mean plasma nicotine significantly from 2.1 (0.2) ng/mL to 20.4 (11.4) ng/mL after 10 puffs and to 21.0 (10.2) ng/mL after ad libitum use. Mean OB plasma nicotine concentration was significantly higher than JUUL and IQOS. OB increased expired carbon monoxide concentration, but IQOS and JUUL did not. 'Craving a cigarette/nicotine' and 'Urges to smoke' were reduced significantly for all products following the directed bout. Among smokers, JUUL and IQOS delivered less nicotine than cigarettes. Also, in this sample, IQOS and OB reduced abstinence symptoms more effectively than JUUL. Additional work with experienced JUUL and IQOS users is needed, as their nicotine delivery profiles and subjective experiences may differ.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
JUUL is an electronic cigarette that aerosolises a nicotine-containing liquid, while IQOS heats tobacco to produce an aerosol. Both are marketed to smokers, but their effects have seldom been examined in this population.
METHODS
METHODS
Eighteen cigarette smokers (13 men) with no JUUL or IQOS experience completed a within-subject, laboratory study assessing nicotine delivery and subjective effects after controlled (10 puffs, ~30 s interpuff interval) and ad libitum (90 min) use of JUUL, IQOS or own-brand (OB) cigarettes.
RESULTS
RESULTS
JUUL increased mean plasma nicotine concentration significantly from 2.2 (SD=0.7) ng/mL to 9.8 (4.9) ng/mL after 10 puffs and to 11.5 (9.3) ng/mL after ad libitum use. IQOS increased mean plasma nicotine significantly from 2.1 (0.2) ng/mL to 12.7 (6.2) ng/mL after 10 puffs and to 11.3 (8.0) ng/mL after ad libitum use. OB increased mean plasma nicotine significantly from 2.1 (0.2) ng/mL to 20.4 (11.4) ng/mL after 10 puffs and to 21.0 (10.2) ng/mL after ad libitum use. Mean OB plasma nicotine concentration was significantly higher than JUUL and IQOS. OB increased expired carbon monoxide concentration, but IQOS and JUUL did not. 'Craving a cigarette/nicotine' and 'Urges to smoke' were reduced significantly for all products following the directed bout.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Among smokers, JUUL and IQOS delivered less nicotine than cigarettes. Also, in this sample, IQOS and OB reduced abstinence symptoms more effectively than JUUL. Additional work with experienced JUUL and IQOS users is needed, as their nicotine delivery profiles and subjective experiences may differ.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32041833
pii: tobaccocontrol-2019-055475
doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2019-055475
pmc: PMC7864587
mid: NIHMS1662415
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : NIDA NIH HHS
ID : F31 DA047018
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDA NIH HHS
ID : P50 DA036105
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDA NIH HHS
ID : U54 DA036105
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: TE is a paid consultant in litigation against the tobacco and electronic cigarette industry and is named on a patent for a device that measures the puffing behavior of ECIG users.
Références
Nicotine Tob Res. 2001 Feb;3(1):7-16
pubmed: 11260806
Nicotine Tob Res. 2001 May;3(2):111-8
pubmed: 11403724
Nicotine Tob Res. 2019 Aug 19;21(9):1285-1288
pubmed: 30476301
Tob Control. 2018 Nov;27(Suppl 1):s37-s38
pubmed: 30242043
Chem Res Toxicol. 2001 Nov;14(11):1465-81
pubmed: 11712903
Nicotine Tob Res. 2000 Feb;2(1):39-43
pubmed: 11072439
Tob Control. 2019 Jan;28(1):34-41
pubmed: 29535257
Nicotine Tob Res. 2006 Dec;8(6):727-38
pubmed: 17132520
Pediatrics. 2018 Jan;141(1):
pubmed: 29233936
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2019 Nov;28(11):1934-1943
pubmed: 31270101
Nicotine Tob Res. 2002;4 Suppl 2:S131-40
pubmed: 12573174
JAMA. 2018 Oct 2;320(13):1379-1380
pubmed: 30285167
Tob Control. 2018 Nov;27(Suppl 1):s9-s12
pubmed: 30131374
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Nov 1;2(11):e1915494
pubmed: 31730180
Tob Control. 2018 Nov;27(Suppl 1):s26-s29
pubmed: 30185530
Tob Control. 2019 Nov;28(6):678-680
pubmed: 30745326
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2019 Oct;27(5):443-454
pubmed: 30777773
Toxicol Mech Methods. 2020 Feb;30(2):81-87
pubmed: 31532297
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018 Jul 1;188:193-199
pubmed: 29778773
Tob Control. 2020 Dec;29(e1):e171-e174
pubmed: 31484802
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2017 Oct;25(5):380-392
pubmed: 29048187
Tob Control. 2018 Nov;27(Suppl 1):s30-s36
pubmed: 30158205
Nicotine Tob Res. 2015 Feb;17(2):165-7
pubmed: 25332456
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Dec 18;15(12):
pubmed: 30567400
Nicotine Tob Res. 2004 Dec;6(6):1021-7
pubmed: 15801575