Compliance of French academic clinical trials with the Clinical Trial Facilitation and Coordination Group recommendations on contraception and pregnancy testing requirements.


Journal

Clinical trials (London, England)
ISSN: 1740-7753
Titre abrégé: Clin Trials
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101197451

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 2020
Historique:
pubmed: 7 2 2020
medline: 23 12 2020
entrez: 7 2 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The Clinical Trials Coordination and Facilitation Group has issued recommendations on contraception and pregnancy testing to help sponsors meet regulatory expectations and harmonize practices to limit embryofetal risks in clinical trials. Our objective was to assess the compliance of French academic clinical trials with these recommendations and to describe the mitigation measures required by sponsors in their trials. A cross-sectional study was performed on the French academic drug trials authorized by the national competent authority between January 2015 and June 2018. We included trials which tested systemic administration of drugs and enrolled men or women of childbearing potential. Data from 97 trials included were compiled. One-third of the trials (23.8%-43.3%, 95% confidence interval) complied with the Clinical Trial Facilitation and Coordination Group recommendations. No improvement over time or according to embryofetotoxic status or drug duration exposure was found. Contraception was required in 56.7% of trials and was more often required in case of potentially embryofetotoxic drugs (68.5% vs 41.9%, p = 0.013) or exposure over 1 month (71.7% vs 43.8%, p = 0.006). Pregnancy testing at inclusion was required in 59.1% of trials and additional testing in 17.2%. Pregnancy testing at inclusion was more often required in trials with drug exposure above 1 month (67.4% vs 45.8%, p = 0.035). French academic sponsors barely met the recommendations on contraception and pregnancy testing potentially leading to potential embryofetal risks in case of pregnancy. They need to implement these recommendations quickly.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND/AIMS
The Clinical Trials Coordination and Facilitation Group has issued recommendations on contraception and pregnancy testing to help sponsors meet regulatory expectations and harmonize practices to limit embryofetal risks in clinical trials. Our objective was to assess the compliance of French academic clinical trials with these recommendations and to describe the mitigation measures required by sponsors in their trials.
METHODS
A cross-sectional study was performed on the French academic drug trials authorized by the national competent authority between January 2015 and June 2018. We included trials which tested systemic administration of drugs and enrolled men or women of childbearing potential.
RESULTS
Data from 97 trials included were compiled. One-third of the trials (23.8%-43.3%, 95% confidence interval) complied with the Clinical Trial Facilitation and Coordination Group recommendations. No improvement over time or according to embryofetotoxic status or drug duration exposure was found. Contraception was required in 56.7% of trials and was more often required in case of potentially embryofetotoxic drugs (68.5% vs 41.9%, p = 0.013) or exposure over 1 month (71.7% vs 43.8%, p = 0.006). Pregnancy testing at inclusion was required in 59.1% of trials and additional testing in 17.2%. Pregnancy testing at inclusion was more often required in trials with drug exposure above 1 month (67.4% vs 45.8%, p = 0.035).
CONCLUSION
French academic sponsors barely met the recommendations on contraception and pregnancy testing potentially leading to potential embryofetal risks in case of pregnancy. They need to implement these recommendations quickly.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32026710
doi: 10.1177/1740774520903720
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

314-322

Auteurs

Sabrina Crepin (S)

Unité de vigilance des essais cliniques, Service de Pharmacologie-Toxicologie et Pharmacovigilance, CHU de Limoges, Limoges, France.

Anne Chiffoleau (A)

Unité de vigilance des essais cliniques, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes, Nantes, France.

Marylaure Gavard (M)

Cellule de vigilance des essais cliniques-délégation à la recherche clinique et à l'innovation-CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.

Pascale Olivier-Abbal (P)

Service de Pharmacologie Médicale et Clinique, Centre de Pharmacovigilance, de Pharmacoépidémiologie et d'Informations sur le Médicament, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Faculté de Médecine, Toulouse, France.
Direction de la Recherche et de l'Innovation, Unité de Vigilance des essais cliniques, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Toulouse, France.

Caroline Roussillon (C)

Direction de la recherche et Clinique et de l'Innovation, Unité de Sécurité et Vigilance de la Recherche Clinique, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.

Sophie Ruault (S)

Maison de la Recherche Clinique, CHU de Rouen, Rouen, France.

Charlotte Muller (C)

Vigilance des essais cliniques, hôpitaux universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.

Laure Peyro-Saint-Paul (L)

Vigilance Recherche Clinique, CHU de Caen Normandie, Caen, France.

Thavarak Ouk (T)

Cellule Vigilance, Direction de la Recherche et de l'Innovation, CHU Lille, Lille, France.

Marie-Paule Franceschi (MP)

Direction de la Recherche, des Partenariats Hospitalo-Universitaires et Internationaux, CHU de Nîmes, Université de Montpellier, Nîmes, France.

Catherine Mouchel (C)

Vigilance des essais cliniques-CIC Inserm 1414-Service de pharmacologie-CHU de Rennes, Rennes, France.

Sophie Duranton (S)

Unité de Vigilance des Essais Cliniques, Direction de la Recherche, CHU Poitiers, Poitiers, France.

Nadine Petitpain (N)

Service de Pharmacologie Clinique et de Toxicologie, Centre Régional de Pharmacovigilance, CHRU de Nancy, Nancy, France.

Anne Coubret-Dumas (A)

Centre régional de pharmacovigilance, Service de Pharmacologie-Toxicologie et Pharmacovigilance, CHU de Limoges, Limoges, France.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH