Expanding the mutational spectrum of monogenic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism: novel mutations in ANOS1 and FGFR1 genes.
ANOS1 mutations
Congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism
FGFR1 mutations
Human reproduction
Kallmann syndrome
Journal
Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E
ISSN: 1477-7827
Titre abrégé: Reprod Biol Endocrinol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101153627
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 Jan 2020
29 Jan 2020
Historique:
received:
18
10
2019
accepted:
23
01
2020
entrez:
31
1
2020
pubmed:
31
1
2020
medline:
13
11
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (CHH) is a rare disease, triggered by defective GnRH secretion, that is usually diagnosed in late adolescence or early adulthood due to the lack of spontaneous pubertal development. To date more than 30 genes have been associated with CHH pathogenesis with X-linked recessive, autosomal dominant, autosomal recessive and oligogenic modes of inheritance. Defective sense of smell is present in about 50-60% of CHH patients and called Kallmann syndrome (KS), in contrast to patients with normal sense of smell referred to as normosmic CHH. ANOS1 and FGFR1 genes are all well established in the pathogenesis of CHH and have been extensively studied in many reported cohorts. Due to rarity and heterogenicity of the condition the mutational spectrum, even in classical CHH genes, have yet to be fully characterized. To address this issue we screened for ANOS1 and FGFR1 variants in a cohort of 47 unrelated CHH subjects using targeted panel sequencing. All potentially pathogenic variants have been validated with Sanger sequencing. Sequencing revealed two ANOS1 and four FGFR1 mutations in six subjects, of which five are novel and one had been previously reported in CHH. Novel variants include a single base pair deletion c.313delT in exon 3 of ANOS1, three missense variants of FGFR1 predicted to result in the single amino acid substitutions c.331C > T (p.R111C), c.1964 T > C (p.L655P) and c.2167G > A (p.E723K) and a 15 bp deletion c.374_388delTGCCCGCAGACTCCG in exon 4 of FGFR1. Based on ACMG-AMP criteria reported variants were assigned to class 5, pathogenic or class 4, likely pathogenic. Protein structural predictions, the rarity of novel variants and amino acid conservation in case of missense substitutions all provide strong evidence that these mutations are highly likely to be deleterious. Despite the fact that ANOS1 and FGFR1 are classical CHH genes and were thoroughly explored in several CHH cohorts we identified new, yet undescribed variants within their sequence. Our results support the genetic complexity of the disorder. The knowledge of the full genetic spectrum of CHH is increasingly important in order to be able to deliver the best personalised medical care to our patients.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (CHH) is a rare disease, triggered by defective GnRH secretion, that is usually diagnosed in late adolescence or early adulthood due to the lack of spontaneous pubertal development. To date more than 30 genes have been associated with CHH pathogenesis with X-linked recessive, autosomal dominant, autosomal recessive and oligogenic modes of inheritance. Defective sense of smell is present in about 50-60% of CHH patients and called Kallmann syndrome (KS), in contrast to patients with normal sense of smell referred to as normosmic CHH. ANOS1 and FGFR1 genes are all well established in the pathogenesis of CHH and have been extensively studied in many reported cohorts. Due to rarity and heterogenicity of the condition the mutational spectrum, even in classical CHH genes, have yet to be fully characterized.
METHODS
METHODS
To address this issue we screened for ANOS1 and FGFR1 variants in a cohort of 47 unrelated CHH subjects using targeted panel sequencing. All potentially pathogenic variants have been validated with Sanger sequencing.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Sequencing revealed two ANOS1 and four FGFR1 mutations in six subjects, of which five are novel and one had been previously reported in CHH. Novel variants include a single base pair deletion c.313delT in exon 3 of ANOS1, three missense variants of FGFR1 predicted to result in the single amino acid substitutions c.331C > T (p.R111C), c.1964 T > C (p.L655P) and c.2167G > A (p.E723K) and a 15 bp deletion c.374_388delTGCCCGCAGACTCCG in exon 4 of FGFR1. Based on ACMG-AMP criteria reported variants were assigned to class 5, pathogenic or class 4, likely pathogenic. Protein structural predictions, the rarity of novel variants and amino acid conservation in case of missense substitutions all provide strong evidence that these mutations are highly likely to be deleterious.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Despite the fact that ANOS1 and FGFR1 are classical CHH genes and were thoroughly explored in several CHH cohorts we identified new, yet undescribed variants within their sequence. Our results support the genetic complexity of the disorder. The knowledge of the full genetic spectrum of CHH is increasingly important in order to be able to deliver the best personalised medical care to our patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31996231
doi: 10.1186/s12958-020-0568-6
pii: 10.1186/s12958-020-0568-6
pmc: PMC6988261
doi:
Substances chimiques
ANOS1 protein, human
0
Extracellular Matrix Proteins
0
Nerve Tissue Proteins
0
FGFR1 protein, human
EC 2.7.10.1
Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 1
EC 2.7.10.1
Types de publication
Case Reports
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
8Subventions
Organisme : Narodowe Centrum Nauki
ID : 2014/13/B/NZ5/03102
Organisme : Polish Mother's Memorial Hospital Research Institute, Lodz, Poland
ID : statutory funding
Références
Cell. 2002 Apr 19;109(2):217-28
pubmed: 12007408
Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2009 Oct;5(10):569-76
pubmed: 19707180
Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2006 Jul 25;254-255:60-9
pubmed: 16764984
J Med Genet. 2017 Jan;54(1):19-25
pubmed: 27512013
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004 Mar;89(3):1079-88
pubmed: 15001591
Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2004 Jun;16(3):293-9
pubmed: 15145354
Nat Clin Pract Endocrinol Metab. 2006 Mar;2(3):160-71
pubmed: 16932275
Brain Res Mol Brain Res. 1989 Dec;6(4):311-26
pubmed: 2687610
N Engl J Med. 1997 Feb 6;336(6):410-5
pubmed: 9010147
Endocr Rev. 2005 Feb;26(1):63-77
pubmed: 15689573
Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1992 Jun;2(3):417-21
pubmed: 1504616
Eur J Endocrinol. 2019 Aug 1;181(2):103-119
pubmed: 31200363
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008 Mar;93(3):758-63
pubmed: 18160472
Science. 2003 May 2;300(5620):750-2
pubmed: 12730587
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Sep 1;89(17):8190-4
pubmed: 1518845
Eur J Endocrinol. 2016 Jun;174(6):R267-74
pubmed: 26792935
Endocrinology. 2008 Oct;149(10):4997-5003
pubmed: 18566132
PLoS Comput Biol. 2010 Dec 02;6(12):e1001025
pubmed: 21152010
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011 Mar;96(3):E566-76
pubmed: 21209029
Am J Hum Genet. 2013 May 2;92(5):725-43
pubmed: 23643382
Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2011 Jul;22(7):249-58
pubmed: 21511493
Nature. 1991 Oct 10;353(6344):529-36
pubmed: 1922361
J Neuroendocrinol. 2008 Feb;20(2):141-63
pubmed: 18034870
Genet Med. 2015 May;17(5):405-24
pubmed: 25741868
Genet Med. 2017 Oct;19(10):1105-1117
pubmed: 28492532
Cell. 1991 Oct 18;67(2):423-35
pubmed: 1913827
Hum Mutat. 2005 Jan;25(1):98-9
pubmed: 15605412
Eur J Endocrinol. 2018 Mar;178(3):R55-R80
pubmed: 29330225
Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2015 Sep;11(9):547-64
pubmed: 26194704
Endocrinology. 2004 Aug;145(8):3830-9
pubmed: 15117872
Endocr Rev. 2019 Apr 1;40(2):669-710
pubmed: 30698671
Nat Genet. 2003 Apr;33(4):463-5
pubmed: 12627230
J Clin Invest. 2010 Oct;120(10):3668-72
pubmed: 20940512