Components of the Patient-Centered Medical Home Associated with Perceived Access to Primary Care.
Journal
Journal of general internal medicine
ISSN: 1525-1497
Titre abrégé: J Gen Intern Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8605834
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2020
06 2020
Historique:
received:
07
08
2019
accepted:
12
01
2020
revised:
27
11
2019
pubmed:
30
1
2020
medline:
15
5
2021
entrez:
30
1
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Following implementation of the patient-centered medical home (PCMH) within the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), access to primary care improved. However, understanding of how this occurred is lacking. To examine the association between organizational aspects of the PCMH model and access-related initiatives with patient perception of access to urgent, same-day, and routine care within the VA. Cross-sectional PARTICIPANTS: Veterans who responded to the annual Survey of Healthcare Experiences of Patients in 2016 (N = 241,122 patients) and primary staff who responded to VA National Primary Care Provider and Staff Survey (N = 4815 staff). Three outcomes of perception of access: percentage of patients responding in the highest category for same-day care (waiting ≤ 1 day), urgent care (always receiving care when needed), and routine care (always receiving checkups when desired). Predictors were staff-level report of access-related initiatives and organizational factors in the clinic. We used generalized estimating equations to model associations, adjusting for characteristics of patients and their respective clinics. Access was significantly better in clinics where staff reviewed performance reports (+ 0.9% in the highest perception of access for urgent care, P < 0.01; + 1.2% for routine care, P < 0.001), leadership was supportive of the PCMH (+ 1.6% for urgent care, P < 0.01), and initiatives to improve access included open access (+ 0.8% to + 1.7% across all outcomes, P < 0.01) and telehealth visits (+ 1.2% to + 1.4%, P < 0.001). Perceived access was worse in clinics with moderate staff burnout (- 1.1% to - 1.4%, P < 0.001), primary care provider turnover during the past year (- 1.0% to - 1.6%, P < 0.001), or medical support assistant turnover in the past year (- 0.9% to - 1.4%, P < 0.001). Perception of access was strongly associated with identifiable organizational factors and access-related initiatives within VA primary care clinics that could be adopted by other health systems.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Following implementation of the patient-centered medical home (PCMH) within the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), access to primary care improved. However, understanding of how this occurred is lacking.
OBJECTIVE
To examine the association between organizational aspects of the PCMH model and access-related initiatives with patient perception of access to urgent, same-day, and routine care within the VA.
DESIGN
Cross-sectional PARTICIPANTS: Veterans who responded to the annual Survey of Healthcare Experiences of Patients in 2016 (N = 241,122 patients) and primary staff who responded to VA National Primary Care Provider and Staff Survey (N = 4815 staff).
MAIN MEASURES
Three outcomes of perception of access: percentage of patients responding in the highest category for same-day care (waiting ≤ 1 day), urgent care (always receiving care when needed), and routine care (always receiving checkups when desired). Predictors were staff-level report of access-related initiatives and organizational factors in the clinic. We used generalized estimating equations to model associations, adjusting for characteristics of patients and their respective clinics.
KEY RESULTS
Access was significantly better in clinics where staff reviewed performance reports (+ 0.9% in the highest perception of access for urgent care, P < 0.01; + 1.2% for routine care, P < 0.001), leadership was supportive of the PCMH (+ 1.6% for urgent care, P < 0.01), and initiatives to improve access included open access (+ 0.8% to + 1.7% across all outcomes, P < 0.01) and telehealth visits (+ 1.2% to + 1.4%, P < 0.001). Perceived access was worse in clinics with moderate staff burnout (- 1.1% to - 1.4%, P < 0.001), primary care provider turnover during the past year (- 1.0% to - 1.6%, P < 0.001), or medical support assistant turnover in the past year (- 0.9% to - 1.4%, P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
Perception of access was strongly associated with identifiable organizational factors and access-related initiatives within VA primary care clinics that could be adopted by other health systems.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31993947
doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05668-7
pii: 10.1007/s11606-020-05668-7
pmc: PMC7280463
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1736-1742Références
N Engl J Med. 2012 May 24;366(21):1955-7
pubmed: 22621625
J Gen Intern Med. 2009 Mar;24(3):327-33
pubmed: 19132326
Med Care. 2012 Nov;50 Suppl:S2-10
pubmed: 23064272
Stat Methods Med Res. 2007 Jun;16(3):219-42
pubmed: 17621469
Health Serv Res. 2007 Apr;42(2):644-62
pubmed: 17362211
J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Jul;29 Suppl 2:S703-7
pubmed: 24715395
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Dec 1;177(12):1826-1832
pubmed: 28973070
Am J Manag Care. 2013 Jul 01;19(7):e263-72
pubmed: 23919446
J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Mar;21 Suppl 3:S26-32
pubmed: 16637941
Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 23;6(1):209
pubmed: 29058637
Jt Comm J Qual Saf. 2004 Aug;30(8):415-23
pubmed: 15357131
Arch Intern Med. 2011 Jul 11;171(13):1150-9
pubmed: 21518935
Am J Med Qual. 2014 May-Jun;29(3):227-35
pubmed: 23939488
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jan 4;2(1):e187096
pubmed: 30657532
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Dec;31(12):1467-1474
pubmed: 27503440
Popul Health Manag. 2018 Apr;21(2):116-122
pubmed: 28677990
Am J Manag Care. 2020 Jan;26(1):40-44
pubmed: 31951358
Stat Med. 2011 Feb 20;30(4):377-99
pubmed: 21225900
Med Care. 2016 Jun;54(6):632-8
pubmed: 26974679
Med Care. 2014 Dec;52(12):1017-22
pubmed: 25271536
J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Apr;28(4):539-45
pubmed: 23192447
Med Care. 2015 Oct;53(10):857-62
pubmed: 26366518
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Aug;174(8):1350-8
pubmed: 25055197
J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Nov;26 Suppl 2:639-47
pubmed: 21989616
J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Jul;32(7):760-766
pubmed: 28233221
Health Serv Res. 2018 Dec;53 Suppl 3:5201-5218
pubmed: 30206936
Ann Fam Med. 2016 Jul;14(4):377-9
pubmed: 27401428
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 May;29(5):874-9
pubmed: 20439874
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jan 4;2(1):e187079
pubmed: 30657527
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Nov;32(11):1990-7
pubmed: 24191091
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2013 Sep 01;13(7):1-48
pubmed: 24133569
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Jul;175(7):1157-62
pubmed: 25985320
Med Care. 1998 Jan;36(1):8-27
pubmed: 9431328