Validity of International Classification of Diseases codes in identifying illicit drug use target conditions using medical record data as a reference standard: A systematic review.
Drug users
International Classification of Diseases
Substance-Related disorders
Systematic review
Validation studies
Journal
Drug and alcohol dependence
ISSN: 1879-0046
Titre abrégé: Drug Alcohol Depend
Pays: Ireland
ID NLM: 7513587
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 03 2020
01 03 2020
Historique:
received:
02
08
2019
revised:
08
12
2019
accepted:
11
12
2019
pubmed:
27
1
2020
medline:
20
1
2021
entrez:
27
1
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The twenty-first century opioid crisis has spurred interest in using International Classification of Diseases (ICD) code algorithms to identify patients using illicit drugs from administrative healthcare data. We conducted a systematic review of studies that validated ICD code algorithms for illicit drug use against a reference standard of medical record data. Systematic searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and Web of Science were conducted for studies published between 1980 and 2018 in English, French, Italian, or Spanish. We included validation studies of ICD-9 or ICD-10 code algorithms for an illicit drug use target condition (e.g., illicit drug use, abuse, or dependence (UAD), illicit drug use-related complications) given the sensitivity or specificity was reported or could be calculated. Bias was assessed with the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies Version 2 (QUADAS-2) tool. Six of the 1210 articles identified met the inclusion criteria. For validation studies of broad UAD (n = 4), the specificity was nearly perfect, but the sensitivity ranged from 47% to 83%, with higher sensitivities tending to occur in higher prevalence populations. For validation studies of injection drug use (IDU)-associated infective endocarditis (n = 2), sensitivity and specificity were poor due to the lack of an ICD code for IDU. For all six studies, the risk of bias for the QUADAS-2 "reference standard" and "flow/timing domains" was scored as "unclear" due to insufficient reporting. Few studies have validated ICD code algorithms for illicit drug use target conditions, and available evidence is challenging to interpret due to inadequate reporting. PROSPERO Registration: CRD42019118401.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The twenty-first century opioid crisis has spurred interest in using International Classification of Diseases (ICD) code algorithms to identify patients using illicit drugs from administrative healthcare data. We conducted a systematic review of studies that validated ICD code algorithms for illicit drug use against a reference standard of medical record data.
METHODS
Systematic searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and Web of Science were conducted for studies published between 1980 and 2018 in English, French, Italian, or Spanish. We included validation studies of ICD-9 or ICD-10 code algorithms for an illicit drug use target condition (e.g., illicit drug use, abuse, or dependence (UAD), illicit drug use-related complications) given the sensitivity or specificity was reported or could be calculated. Bias was assessed with the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies Version 2 (QUADAS-2) tool.
RESULTS
Six of the 1210 articles identified met the inclusion criteria. For validation studies of broad UAD (n = 4), the specificity was nearly perfect, but the sensitivity ranged from 47% to 83%, with higher sensitivities tending to occur in higher prevalence populations. For validation studies of injection drug use (IDU)-associated infective endocarditis (n = 2), sensitivity and specificity were poor due to the lack of an ICD code for IDU. For all six studies, the risk of bias for the QUADAS-2 "reference standard" and "flow/timing domains" was scored as "unclear" due to insufficient reporting.
CONCLUSIONS
Few studies have validated ICD code algorithms for illicit drug use target conditions, and available evidence is challenging to interpret due to inadequate reporting. PROSPERO Registration: CRD42019118401.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31982637
pii: S0376-8716(19)30602-7
doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.107825
pmc: PMC9533471
mid: NIHMS1839011
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Illicit Drugs
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
107825Subventions
Organisme : NIAMS NIH HHS
ID : P30 AR072571
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : R03 AG060272
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAMS NIH HHS
ID : R21 AR074578
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : U54 GM104938
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest No conflict declared.
Références
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 15;10(6):e0129360
pubmed: 26075888
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Jan 23;12:18
pubmed: 22270080
Med Care. 2018 Oct;56(10):e70-e75
pubmed: 29200131
Med Care. 1998 Sep;36(9):1324-36
pubmed: 9749656
Clin Infect Dis. 2000 Apr;30(4):633-8
pubmed: 10770721
Heart Lung Circ. 2018 Apr;27(4):484-488
pubmed: 28533098
Med Care. 2011 Jun;49(6):e1-8
pubmed: 21422962
JAMA. 2012 Apr 4;307(13):1433-5
pubmed: 22474208
Clin Infect Dis. 2007 Nov 1;45(9):1200-3
pubmed: 17918083
AIDS. 2005 Oct;19 Suppl 3:S99-105
pubmed: 16251836
Health Serv Res. 2008 Aug;43(4):1424-41
pubmed: 18756617
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Oct 18;155(8):529-36
pubmed: 22007046
Int J Drug Policy. 2018 May;55:31-39
pubmed: 29482150
BMJ. 2009 Jul 21;339:b2535
pubmed: 19622551
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Aug;476(8):1557-1565
pubmed: 29762153
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2016 Jul 26;3(3):ofw157
pubmed: 27800528