The Selfie View: Perioperative Photography in the Digital Age.


Journal

Aesthetic plastic surgery
ISSN: 1432-5241
Titre abrégé: Aesthetic Plast Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7701756

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 2020
Historique:
received: 17 10 2019
accepted: 15 12 2019
pubmed: 11 1 2020
medline: 7 1 2021
entrez: 11 1 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The aesthetics of social media have become increasingly important to cosmetic surgery patients in recent years; however, aesthetic treatments have not kept pace with the desires of modern patients. The current study investigates the most common angles employed by various user cohorts when posting a selfie on social media platforms and proposes that aesthetic surgeons consider utilizing a selfie angle alongside standard pre- and postoperative photographic views. Full face photographs published on the social media platform Instagram™ with the tag #selfie were divided into three cohorts: female models/influencers, amateur females, and amateur males. Each cohort contained 100 photographs. The photographs were analyzed using cloud-based facial analysis software for facial pan, roll, and tilt relative to the camera. One hundred photographs from each cohort were analyzed and demonstrated that amateur females (AF) take photographs from higher angles than amateur males (AM) or model females (MF). Roll-off-midline was significantly greater for AF and MF as compared to AM. The MF group had significantly a greater pan-off-midline as compared to AF and AM, while AF had significantly a greater pan-off-midline than AM. Common photography practices employed within selfie photographs utilize angles not captured in standard perioperative photographs. This study supports the implementation of a selfie photograph into the standard set of pre- and postoperative photographs taken by aesthetic surgeons to evaluate the effects of interventions in the context of selfie photography. The angle employed can vary depending upon the demographic profile of the patient. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
The aesthetics of social media have become increasingly important to cosmetic surgery patients in recent years; however, aesthetic treatments have not kept pace with the desires of modern patients. The current study investigates the most common angles employed by various user cohorts when posting a selfie on social media platforms and proposes that aesthetic surgeons consider utilizing a selfie angle alongside standard pre- and postoperative photographic views.
METHODS
Full face photographs published on the social media platform Instagram™ with the tag #selfie were divided into three cohorts: female models/influencers, amateur females, and amateur males. Each cohort contained 100 photographs. The photographs were analyzed using cloud-based facial analysis software for facial pan, roll, and tilt relative to the camera.
RESULTS
One hundred photographs from each cohort were analyzed and demonstrated that amateur females (AF) take photographs from higher angles than amateur males (AM) or model females (MF). Roll-off-midline was significantly greater for AF and MF as compared to AM. The MF group had significantly a greater pan-off-midline as compared to AF and AM, while AF had significantly a greater pan-off-midline than AM.
CONCLUSIONS
Common photography practices employed within selfie photographs utilize angles not captured in standard perioperative photographs. This study supports the implementation of a selfie photograph into the standard set of pre- and postoperative photographs taken by aesthetic surgeons to evaluate the effects of interventions in the context of selfie photography. The angle employed can vary depending upon the demographic profile of the patient.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31919625
doi: 10.1007/s00266-019-01593-1
pii: 10.1007/s00266-019-01593-1
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1066-1070

Références

Chae J (2017) Virtual makeover: selfie-taking and social media use increase selfie-editing frequency through social comparison. Comput Hum Behav 66:370–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.10.007
doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.10.007
Pew Research Center (2018) Social media use in 2018. Pew Research Center, Washington, DC
Chen J, Ishii M, Bater KL et al (2019) Association between the use of social media and photograph editing applications, self-esteem, and cosmetic surgery acceptance. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 21(5):361–367
doi: 10.1001/jamafacial.2019.0328
Montemurro P et al (2015) The influence of social media and easily accessible online information on the aesthetic plastic surgery practice: literature review and our own experience. Aesthet Plast Surg 39(2):270–277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-015-0454-3
doi: 10.1007/s00266-015-0454-3
Sedgewick JR, Flath ME, Elias LJ (2017) Presenting your best self(ie): the influence of gender on vertical orientation of selfies on tinder. Front Psychol 8(APR):1–6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00604
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00604
Frederick DA, Haselton MG (2007) Why is muscularity sexy? Tests of the fitness indicator hypothesis. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 33(8):1167–1183
doi: 10.1177/0146167207303022
Schneider TM, Carbon CC (2017) Taking the perfect selfie: investigating the impact of perspective on the perception of higher cognitive variables. Front Psychol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00971
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00971 pubmed: 29387030 pmcid: 5742168
Henderson JL, Larrabee WF, Krieger BD (2005) Photographic standards for facial plastic surgery. Arch Fac Plast Surg 7(5):331–333. https://doi.org/10.1001/archfaci.7.5.331
doi: 10.1001/archfaci.7.5.331
Swamy RS, Sykes JM, Most SP (2010) Principles of photography in rhinoplasty for the digital photographer. Clin Plast Surg 37(2):213–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cps.2009.12.003
doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2009.12.003 pubmed: 20206739
Ellenbogen R, Jankauskas S, Collini F (1990) Achieving standardized photographs in aesthetic surgery. Plast Reconst Surg 86(5):955–961
doi: 10.1097/00006534-199011000-00019
Zarem H (1984) Standards of photography. Plast Reconst Surg 74(137):137–144
doi: 10.1097/00006534-198407000-00027
Galdino GM, Dasilva And D, Gunter JP (2002) Digital photography for rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 109(4):1421–1434
doi: 10.1097/00006534-200204010-00035
Lindell AK (2019) Left cheek poses garner more likes: the effect of pose orientation on Instagram engagement. Laterality Asymmetries Body Brain Cognit 24(5):600–613. https://doi.org/10.1080/1357650X.2018.1556278
doi: 10.1080/1357650X.2018.1556278
Manovich L, Ferrari V, Bruno N (2017) Selfie-takers prefer left cheeks: converging evidence from the (extended) database. Front Psychol 8:1460
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01460
Zaidel DW, Chen AC, German C (1995) She is not a beauty even when she smiles: possible evolutionary basis for a relationship between facial attractiveness and hemispheric specialization. Neuropsychologia 33(5):649–655
doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(94)00135-C
Burt DM, Perrett DI (1997) Perceptual asymmetries in judgements of facial attractiveness, age, gender, speech and expression. Neuropsychologia 35(5):685–693
doi: 10.1016/S0028-3932(96)00111-X
Ward B, Ward M, Fried O, Paskhover B (2018) Nasal distortion in short-distance photographs: the selfie effect. JAMA Fac Plast Surg 20(4):333–335
doi: 10.1001/jamafacial.2018.0009

Auteurs

Michael Eggerstedt (M)

Section of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison Street; Suite 550, Chicago, IL, USA. Michael_eggerstedt@rush.edu.

Jane Schumacher (J)

Section of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison Street; Suite 550, Chicago, IL, USA.

Matthew J Urban (MJ)

Section of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison Street; Suite 550, Chicago, IL, USA.

Ryan M Smith (RM)

Section of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison Street; Suite 550, Chicago, IL, USA.

Peter C Revenaugh (PC)

Section of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison Street; Suite 550, Chicago, IL, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH