Population Pharmacokinetics of Vancomycin Under Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy Using a Polymethylmethacrylate Hemofilter.


Journal

Therapeutic drug monitoring
ISSN: 1536-3694
Titre abrégé: Ther Drug Monit
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7909660

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 2020
Historique:
pubmed: 9 1 2020
medline: 6 5 2021
entrez: 9 1 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Although continuous hemodiafiltration (CHDF) is often performed in critically ill patients during sepsis treatment, the pharmacokinetics of vancomycin (VCM) during CHDF with a polymethylmethacrylate hemofilter (PMMA-CHDF) have not been revealed. In this study, the authors aimed to describe the population pharmacokinetics of VCM in critically ill patients undergoing PMMA-CHDF and clarify its hemofilter clearance (CLhemofilter). This single-center, retrospective study enrolled patients who underwent intravenous VCM therapy during PMMA-CHDF at the intensive care unit of Chiba University Hospital between 2008 and 2016. A population analysis was performed, and CLhemofilter was assessed. Twenty-five patients were enrolled. Median body weight (BW) and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score were 63 kg and 15, respectively. Mean conditions for CHDF were 107.5 ± 18.3 mL/min for blood flow rate and 26.3 ± 6.3 mL/kg/h for effluent flow rate. The mean parameter estimates were distribution volume of the central compartment (V1), 59.1 L; clearance of the central compartment (CL1), 1.35 L/h; distribution volume of the peripheral compartment (V2), 56.1 L; and clearance of the peripheral compartment (CL2), 3.65 L/h. BW and SOFA score were significantly associated with V1 (P < 0.05) and CL1 (P < 0.05), respectively, and were thus selected as covariates in the final model. The estimated dosage of VCM to achieve a target area under the concentration-time curve/minimum inhibitory concentration ≥400 was 27.1 mg/kg for loading and 9.7 mg/kg every 24 hours for maintenance; these dosages were affected by BW and SOFA score. Mean CLhemofilter obtained from 8 patients was 1.35 L/h, which was similar to CL1. The authors clarified the pharmacokinetics and CLhemofilter of VCM in PMMA-CHDF patients. The PK of VCM in patients undergoing CHDF appeared to vary not only with the CHDF setting and BW but also with SOFA score.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Although continuous hemodiafiltration (CHDF) is often performed in critically ill patients during sepsis treatment, the pharmacokinetics of vancomycin (VCM) during CHDF with a polymethylmethacrylate hemofilter (PMMA-CHDF) have not been revealed. In this study, the authors aimed to describe the population pharmacokinetics of VCM in critically ill patients undergoing PMMA-CHDF and clarify its hemofilter clearance (CLhemofilter).
METHODS
This single-center, retrospective study enrolled patients who underwent intravenous VCM therapy during PMMA-CHDF at the intensive care unit of Chiba University Hospital between 2008 and 2016. A population analysis was performed, and CLhemofilter was assessed.
RESULTS
Twenty-five patients were enrolled. Median body weight (BW) and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score were 63 kg and 15, respectively. Mean conditions for CHDF were 107.5 ± 18.3 mL/min for blood flow rate and 26.3 ± 6.3 mL/kg/h for effluent flow rate. The mean parameter estimates were distribution volume of the central compartment (V1), 59.1 L; clearance of the central compartment (CL1), 1.35 L/h; distribution volume of the peripheral compartment (V2), 56.1 L; and clearance of the peripheral compartment (CL2), 3.65 L/h. BW and SOFA score were significantly associated with V1 (P < 0.05) and CL1 (P < 0.05), respectively, and were thus selected as covariates in the final model. The estimated dosage of VCM to achieve a target area under the concentration-time curve/minimum inhibitory concentration ≥400 was 27.1 mg/kg for loading and 9.7 mg/kg every 24 hours for maintenance; these dosages were affected by BW and SOFA score. Mean CLhemofilter obtained from 8 patients was 1.35 L/h, which was similar to CL1.
CONCLUSIONS
The authors clarified the pharmacokinetics and CLhemofilter of VCM in PMMA-CHDF patients. The PK of VCM in patients undergoing CHDF appeared to vary not only with the CHDF setting and BW but also with SOFA score.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31913865
doi: 10.1097/FTD.0000000000000721
pii: 00007691-202006000-00016
doi:

Substances chimiques

Anti-Bacterial Agents 0
Vancomycin 6Q205EH1VU
Polymethyl Methacrylate 9011-14-7

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

452-459

Références

Gaieski DF, Mikkelsen ME, Band RA, et al. Impact of time to antibiotics on survival in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock in whom early goal-directed therapy was initiated in the emergency department. Crit Care Med. 2010;38:1045–1053.
Matzke GR, Zhanel GG, Guay DR. Clinical pharmacokinetics of vancomycin. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1986;11:257–282.
van Hal SJ, Paterson DL, Lodise TP. Systematic review and meta-analysis of vancomycin-induced nephrotoxicity associated with dosing schedules that maintain troughs between 15 and 20 milligrams per liter. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013;57:734–744.
Álvarez R, López Cortés LE, Molina J, et al. Optimizing the clinical use of vancomycin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016;60:2601–2609.
Matsumoto K, Takesue Y, Ohmagari N, et al. Practice guidelines for therapeutic drug monitoring of vancomycin: a consensus review of the Japanese Society of Chemotherapy and the Japanese Society of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring. J Infect Chemother. 2013;19:365–380.
Nakada TA, Oda S, Matsuda K, et al. Continuous hemodiafiltration with PMMA Hemofilter in the treatment of patients with septic shock. Mol Med. 2008;14:257–263.
Gonçalves-Pereira J, Martins A, Póvoa P. Pharmacokinetics of gentamicin in critically ill patients: pilot study evaluating the first dose. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2010;16:1258–1263.
Schetz M, Ferdinande P, Van den Berghe G, et al. Pharmacokinetics of continuous renal replacement therapy. Intensive Care Med. 1995;21:612–620.
Abe R, Oda S, Shinozaki K, et al. Continuous hemodiafiltration using a polymethyl methacrylate membrane hemofilter for severe acute pancreatitis. Contrib Nephrol. 2010;166:54–63.
Matsuda K, Moriguchi T, Oda S, et al. Efficacy of continuous hemodiafiltration with a cytokine-adsorbing hemofilter in the treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Contrib Nephrol. 2010;166:83–92.
Hirasawa H, Oda S, Nakamura M, et al. Continuous hemodiafiltration with a cytokine-adsorbing hemofilter for sepsis. Blood Purif. 2012;34:164–170.
Joy MS, Matzke GR, Frye RF, et al. Determinants of vancomycin clearance by continuous venovenous hemofiltration and continuous venovenous hemodialysis. Am J Kidney Dis. 1998;31:1019–1027.
Bugge JF. Pharmacokinetics and drug dosing adjustments during continuous venovenous hemofiltration or hemodiafiltration in critically ill patients. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2001;45:929–934.
DelDot ME, Lipman J, Tett SE. Vancomycin pharmacokinetics in critically ill patients receiving continuous venovenous haemodiafiltration. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2004;58:259–268.
Boereboom FT, Ververs FF, Blankestijn PJ, et al. Vancomycin clearance during continuous venovenous haemofiltration in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med. 1999;25:1100–1104.
Trotman RL, Williamson JC, Shoemaker DM, et al. Antibiotic dosing in critically ill adult patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;41:1159–1166.
Choi G, Gomersall CD, Tian Q, et al. Principles of antibacterial dosing in continuous renal replacement therapy. Blood Purif. 2010;30:195–212.
Wilson FP, Berns JS. Vancomycin levels are frequently subtherapeutic during continuous venovenous hemodialysis (CVVHD). Clin Nephrol. 2012;77:329–331.
Chaijamorn W, Jitsurong A, Wiwattanawongsa K, et al. Vancomycin clearance during continuous venovenous haemofiltration in critically ill patients. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2011;38:152–156.
Yamamoto T, Yasuno N, Katada S, et al. Proposal of a pharmacokinetically optimized dosage regimen of antibiotics in patients receiving continuous hemodiafiltration. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011;55:5804–5812.
Frazee EN, Kuper PJ, Schramm GE, et al. Effect of continuous venovenous hemofiltration dose on achievement of adequate vancomycin trough concentrations. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012;56:6181–6185.
Roberts DM, Liu X, Roberts JA, et al. A multicenter study on the effect of continuous hemodiafiltration intensity on antibiotic pharmacokinetics. Crit Care. 2015;19:84.
Ette EI. Stability and performance of a population pharmacokinetic model. J Clin Pharmacol. 1997;37:486–495.
Pascual M, Tolkoff-Rubin N, Schifferli JA. Is adsorption an important characteristic of dialysis membranes? Kidney Int. 1996;49:309–313.
Tian Q, Gomersall CD, Ip M, et al. Adsorption of amikacin, a significant mechanism of elimination by hemofiltration. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008;52:1009–1013.
Roberts JA, Lipman J. Pharmacokinetic issues for antibiotics in the critically ill patient. Crit Care Med. 2009;37:840–851.
Llopis-Salvia P, Jiménez-Torres NV. Population pharmacokinetic parameters of vancomycin in critically ill patients. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2006;31:447–454.
Claisse G, Zufferey PJ, Trone JC, et al. Predicting the dose of vancomycin in ICU patients receiving different types of RRT therapy: a model-based meta-analytic approach. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2019;85:1215–1226.
Chuma M, Makishima M, Imai T, et al. Duration of systemic inflammatory response syndrome influences serum vancomycin concentration in patients with sepsis. Clin Ther. 2016;38:2598–2609.
Lee B, Kim SJ, Park JD, et al. Factors affecting serum concentration of vancomycin in critically ill oliguric pediatric patients receiving continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0199158.
Doi K, Nishida O, Shigematsu T, et al. The Japanese clinical practice guideline for acute kidney injury 2016. Clin Exp Nephrol. 2018;22:985–1045.
Chuma M, Makishima M, Imai T, et al. Relationship between hemoglobin levels and vancomycin clearance in patients with sepsis. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2019;75:929–937.

Auteurs

Shingo Yamazaki (S)

Division of Pharmacy, Chiba University Hospital.

Mizuki Tatebe (M)

Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chiba University; and.

Masachika Fujiyoshi (M)

Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chiba University; and.

Noriyuki Hattori (N)

Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.

Tatsuya Suzuki (T)

Division of Pharmacy, Chiba University Hospital.

Hirokazu Takatsuka (H)

Division of Pharmacy, Chiba University Hospital.

Masashi Uchida (M)

Division of Pharmacy, Chiba University Hospital.
Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chiba University; and.

Takaaki Suzuki (T)

Division of Pharmacy, Chiba University Hospital.
Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chiba University; and.

Itsuko Ishii (I)

Division of Pharmacy, Chiba University Hospital.
Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chiba University; and.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH