Bisoprolol transdermal patch for perioperative care of non-cardiac surgery in patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy.
Administration, Cutaneous
Administration, Oral
Adrenergic beta-1 Receptor Antagonists
/ administration & dosage
Bisoprolol
/ administration & dosage
Cardiomyopathy, Hypertrophic
/ diagnostic imaging
Hemodynamics
/ drug effects
Humans
Perioperative Care
/ adverse effects
Registries
Retrospective Studies
Time Factors
Transdermal Patch
Treatment Outcome
Bisoprolol transdermal patch
Cardiovascular complications
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy
Non-cardiac surgery
Perioperative care
Retrospective study
β-Blocker
Journal
BMC cardiovascular disorders
ISSN: 1471-2261
Titre abrégé: BMC Cardiovasc Disord
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968539
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 12 2019
30 12 2019
Historique:
received:
20
02
2019
accepted:
22
11
2019
entrez:
1
1
2020
pubmed:
1
1
2020
medline:
23
6
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Non-cardiac surgery for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) is considered to require meticulous perioperative care. β-blockers are considered the first-line drugs for patients with HOCM, and they play a key role in preventing cardiovascular complications in perioperative care. The bisoprolol transdermal patch has recently become available in Japan, and it is useful for patients who are unable to take oral medication during perioperative care. The aim of this case series was to assess the hemodynamic features of patients with HOCM who used the bisoprolol transdermal patch during perioperative care for non-cardiac surgery. Between August 2016 and August 2018, we retrospectively analyzed 10 consecutive cases of HOCM with the patients using the bisoprolol transdermal patch during perioperative care. Hemodynamic and echocardiographic features were evaluated before and after patients were switched from oral bisoprolol to transdermal patch therapy or started transdermal patch therapy as a new β-blocker medication. In addition, cardiovascular complications (all-cause death, cardiac death, heart failure, ventricular tachycardia, and ventricular fibrillation) during the perioperative period were evaluated. There was no significant change in the patients' heart rate, blood pressure, ejection fraction, and pressure gradient in the left ventricle after switching from oral bisoprolol to the transdermal patch therapy. On the other hand, patients who started using the bisoprolol transdermal patch as a new ß-blocker medication tended to have a decreased heart rate and pressure gradient thereafter, but there was no significant difference in blood pressure or ejection fraction. No cardiovascular complications occurred during the perioperative period. We described the utilization of the bisoprolol transdermal patch during perioperative care for non-cardiac surgery in patients with HOCM. We determined that the hemodynamic features of these patients did not change significantly after switching to patch therapy. Further, initiation of the bisoprolol transdermal patch as a new ß-blocker medication sufficiently tended to decrease the pressure gradient. This unique approach can be an alternate treatment option for HOCM. The registry was registered in the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000036703). The date of registration was 10/5/2019 and it was "Retrospectively registered".
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Non-cardiac surgery for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) is considered to require meticulous perioperative care. β-blockers are considered the first-line drugs for patients with HOCM, and they play a key role in preventing cardiovascular complications in perioperative care. The bisoprolol transdermal patch has recently become available in Japan, and it is useful for patients who are unable to take oral medication during perioperative care. The aim of this case series was to assess the hemodynamic features of patients with HOCM who used the bisoprolol transdermal patch during perioperative care for non-cardiac surgery.
METHODS
Between August 2016 and August 2018, we retrospectively analyzed 10 consecutive cases of HOCM with the patients using the bisoprolol transdermal patch during perioperative care. Hemodynamic and echocardiographic features were evaluated before and after patients were switched from oral bisoprolol to transdermal patch therapy or started transdermal patch therapy as a new β-blocker medication. In addition, cardiovascular complications (all-cause death, cardiac death, heart failure, ventricular tachycardia, and ventricular fibrillation) during the perioperative period were evaluated.
RESULTS
There was no significant change in the patients' heart rate, blood pressure, ejection fraction, and pressure gradient in the left ventricle after switching from oral bisoprolol to the transdermal patch therapy. On the other hand, patients who started using the bisoprolol transdermal patch as a new ß-blocker medication tended to have a decreased heart rate and pressure gradient thereafter, but there was no significant difference in blood pressure or ejection fraction. No cardiovascular complications occurred during the perioperative period.
CONCLUSIONS
We described the utilization of the bisoprolol transdermal patch during perioperative care for non-cardiac surgery in patients with HOCM. We determined that the hemodynamic features of these patients did not change significantly after switching to patch therapy. Further, initiation of the bisoprolol transdermal patch as a new ß-blocker medication sufficiently tended to decrease the pressure gradient. This unique approach can be an alternate treatment option for HOCM.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
The registry was registered in the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000036703). The date of registration was 10/5/2019 and it was "Retrospectively registered".
Identifiants
pubmed: 31888491
doi: 10.1186/s12872-019-01274-6
pii: 10.1186/s12872-019-01274-6
pmc: PMC6936131
doi:
Substances chimiques
Adrenergic beta-1 Receptor Antagonists
0
Bisoprolol
Y41JS2NL6U
Banques de données
JPRN
['UMIN000036703']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
316Références
Circulation. 2006 Nov 21;114(21):2232-9
pubmed: 17088454
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Jul 28;66(4):403-69
pubmed: 25553722
Nat Biotechnol. 2008 Nov;26(11):1261-8
pubmed: 18997767
Circulation. 2016 May 10;133(19):1901-5
pubmed: 27166348
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993 Jun;21(7):1672-9
pubmed: 8496536
Clin Cardiol. 2006 Feb;29(2):65-8
pubmed: 16506641
Circ J. 2013;77(4):908-16
pubmed: 23502991
Eur Heart J. 2014 Sep 14;35(35):2383-431
pubmed: 25086026
Cardiovasc Ther. 2018 Jun;36(3):e12325
pubmed: 29464917
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2013 Nov;15(11):806-14
pubmed: 24119112
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999 May;33(6):1590-5
pubmed: 10334429
Circ J. 2017 Dec 25;82(1):141-147
pubmed: 28768917
Ann Surg. 2012 Apr;255(4):696-702
pubmed: 22418007
J Anesth. 2016 Oct;30(5):891-4
pubmed: 27262288
Eur Heart J. 2014 Oct 14;35(39):2733-79
pubmed: 25173338
Circ J. 2016;80(3):753-74
pubmed: 26841693
Chest. 1988 Apr;93(4):705-11
pubmed: 2894920
Am J Cardiol. 1991 Sep 15;68(8):766-72
pubmed: 1892084
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Mar 29;67(12):1399-1409
pubmed: 27012399
Br Heart J. 1981 Jun;45(6):637-42
pubmed: 6114739
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Nov 6;50(19):1857-63
pubmed: 17980252
Anesthesiology. 2009 Oct;111(4):690-4
pubmed: 19707118
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011 Dec;142(6):e153-203
pubmed: 22093723