A proposal on the first Japanese practical guidance for the return of individual genomic results in research settings.


Journal

Journal of human genetics
ISSN: 1435-232X
Titre abrégé: J Hum Genet
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9808008

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Mar 2020
Historique:
received: 25 06 2019
accepted: 19 11 2019
revised: 19 11 2019
pubmed: 25 12 2019
medline: 10 10 2020
entrez: 25 12 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Large-scale, low-cost genome analysis has become possible with next-generation sequencing technology, which is currently used in research and clinical practice. Many attempts of returning individual genomic results have commenced not only in clinical practice, but also in research settings of several countries. In Japan, the government guidelines include a section on the disclosure of genetic information regarding genome analysis in research. However, no practical guidance for the return of individual genomic results in research settings (ROGRR) currently exists. We propose practical guidance regarding ROGRR in Japan based on extensive research, including a literature review of related previous studies, an examination of the relevant legislation in Japan, and interviews with stakeholders. The guidance we developed consists of "Points to consider" and "Issues for further discussion and consideration." The "Points to consider" were divided into five parts, from preliminary review before discussion of policy, to the actual return and follow-up process, in the order of the assumed ROGRR process. It is anticipated that a situation will arise where numerous research projects will consider ROGRR carefully and realistically in the future, and in the process of drafting such practical guidance, various issues requiring continuous discussion will emerge. The necessities of continuous discussion concerning ROGRR in Japan's context is increasing, particularly in terms of the ethical, legal, and social implications. We believe such discussions and considerations may contribute to creating a new system that will increase availability of personalized medicine and prevention using genetic information, allowing them to become useful to the broader population.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31873219
doi: 10.1038/s10038-019-0697-y
pii: 10.1038/s10038-019-0697-y
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

251-261

Subventions

Organisme : Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED)
ID : 18km0405301
Organisme : Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED)
ID : 18km0405301
Organisme : Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED)
ID : 18km0405301
Organisme : Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED)
ID : 18km0405301

Références

Green RC, Berg JS, Grody WW, Kalia SS, Korf BR, Martin CL, et al. ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing. Genet Med. 2013;15:565–74.
doi: 10.1038/gim.2013.73
Kalia SS, Adelman K, Bale SJ, Chung WK, Eng C, Evans JP, et al. Recommendations for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing, 2016 update (ACMG SF v2.0): a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. Genet Med. 2017;19:249–55.
doi: 10.1038/gim.2016.190
Burke W, Antommaria AH, Bennett R, Botkin J, Clayton EW, Henderson GE, et al. Recommendations for returning genomic incidental findings? We need to talk! Genet Med. 2013;15:854–9.
doi: 10.1038/gim.2013.113
Scheuner MT, Peredo J, Benkendorf J, Bowdish B, Feldman G, Fleisher L, et al. Reporting genomic secondary findings: ACMG members weigh in. Genet Med. 2015;17:27–35.
doi: 10.1038/gim.2014.165
McGuire AL, Joffe S, Koenig BA, Biesecker BB, McCullough LB, Blumenthal-Barby JS, et al. Point-counterpoint. Ethics and genomic incidental findings. Science. 2013;340:1047–8.
doi: 10.1126/science.1240156
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Returning individual research results to participants: guidance for a new research paradigm. Washington D.C.: National Academies Press; 2018.
Wolf SM, Crock BN, Van Ness B, Lawrenz F, Kahn JP, Beskow LM, et al. Managing incidental findings and research results in genomic research involving biobanks and archived data sets. Genet Med. 2012;14:361–84.
doi: 10.1038/gim.2012.23
Jarvik GP, Amendola LM, Berg JS, Brothers K, Clayton EW, Chung W, et al. Return of genomic results to research participants: the floor, the ceiling, and the choices in between. Am J Hum Genet. 2014;94:818–26.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2014.04.009
Schwartz MLB, McCormick CZ, Lazzeri AL, Lindbuchler DM, Hallquist MLG, Manickam K, et al. A model for genome-first care: returning secondary genomic findings to participants and their healthcare providers in a large research cohort. Am J Hum Genet. 2018;103:328–37.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.07.009
Smith LA, Douglas J, Braxton AA, Kramer K. Reporting incidental findings in clinical whole exome sequencing: incorporation of the 2013 ACMG recommendations into current practices of genetic counseling. J Genet Couns. 2015;24:654–62.
doi: 10.1007/s10897-014-9794-4
Alver M, Palover M, Saar A, Lall K, Zekavat SM, Tonisson N, et al. Recall by genotype and cascade screening for familial hypercholesterolemia in a population-based biobank from Estonia. Genet Med. 2019;21:1173–80.
doi: 10.1038/s41436-018-0311-2
Ormondroyd E, Mackley MP, Blair E, Craft J, Knight JC, Taylor JC, et al. “Not pathogenic until proven otherwise”: perspectives of UK clinical genomics professionals toward secondary findings in context of a Genomic Medicine Multidisciplinary Team and the 100,000 Genomes Project. Genet Med. 2018;20:320–8.
doi: 10.1038/gim.2017.157
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry. Ethical guidelines for human genome/gene analysis research 2001 (Latest revision: 2017). https://www.mhlw.go.jp/file/06-Seisakujouhou-10600000-Daijinkanboukouseikagakuka/0000153405.pdf .
The Japanese Association of Medical Sciences. Guidelines for genetic tests and diagnoses in medical practice 2011. http://jams.med.or.jp/guideline/genetics-diagnosis_e.pdf .
Leading the way to Genomic Medicine by ELSI Research Program. Return of individual genomic results in research settings; a proposal on the points to consider and the discussion agenda for the future. https://www.amed.go.jp/content/000048196.pdf
Tohoku University Tohoku Medical Megabank Organization. Return of genomic results to cohort study participants. https://www.megabank.tohoku.ac.jp/english/research/cohortbiobank/ror/ .
Kiyozumi Y, Horiuchi Y, Nishimura S, Kado N, Mizuguchi M, Shimoda Y, et al. Examination of the returning genomic results of secondary findings and genetic counseling systems in clinical genome study—Practice in Shizuoka Cancer Center Project HOPE. Jpn J Genet Couns. 2018;39:129–38.
Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. Overview of Medical Service Regime in Japan. https://www.mhlw.go.jp/bunya/iryouhoken/iryouhoken01/dl/01_eng.pdf .
Sapp JC, Johnston JJ, Driscoll K, Heidlebaugh AR, Miren Sagardia A, Dogbe DN, et al. Evaluation of recipients of positive and negative secondary findings evaluations in a hybrid CLIA-research sequencing pilot. Am J Hum Genet. 2018;103:358–66.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.07.018

Auteurs

Yayoi Aizawa (Y)

Department of Public Relations and Planning, Tohoku Medical Organization, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Department of Biomedical Ethics and Public Policy, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.

Fuji Nagami (F)

Department of Public Relations and Planning, Tohoku Medical Organization, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan. f-nagami@med.tohoku.ac.jp.

Noriko Ohashi (N)

Department of Biomedical Ethics and Public Policy, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.
Ethical, Legal and Social Issues Core Institute for Datability Science, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.

Kazuto Kato (K)

Department of Biomedical Ethics and Public Policy, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.

Articles similaires

Genome, Chloroplast Phylogeny Genetic Markers Base Composition High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C

Classifications MeSH