A cross-sectional study on feather cover damage in Canadian laying hens in non-cage housing systems.


Journal

BMC veterinary research
ISSN: 1746-6148
Titre abrégé: BMC Vet Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101249759

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 Dec 2019
Historique:
received: 12 03 2019
accepted: 07 11 2019
entrez: 5 12 2019
pubmed: 5 12 2019
medline: 20 3 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Feather damage (FD) resulting from feather pecking remains a concern in non-cage housing systems for laying hens worldwide. This study aimed to identify bird-, housing-, and management-related factors associated with FD in non-cage housing systems as the egg production sector phases out the conventional cage system in Canada. A survey on housing and management practices was developed and distributed to 122 laying hen farms where 39 respondents provided information on non-cage flocks. Farmers visually assessed 50 birds throughout the barn for FD using a 0-2 scoring scale according to severity. Prevalence of FD was calculated as the percentage of birds with any form of FD (score > 0). Multivariable linear regression modeling was used to identify factors associated with FD prevalence. Six variables were included in the final model and accounted for 64% of the variation in FD between farms. FD prevalence was higher with increasing flock age (0.9% ± 0.29) and when birds were housed in all wire/slatted barns compared with all litter barns (37.6% ± 13.1). Additionally, FD prevalence tended to be higher in barns with manure removal only after depopulation (20.1% ± 10.70). Enrichment also tended to be associated with higher FD (19.1% ± 8.04), possibly indicating that it was provided after FD was observed as a control measure, or, was not efficient in reducing the development of FD. These findings emphasize the role of litter provision and management (e.g., manure removal effects on air quality), and its potential impact on FD among laying hens in non-cage housing systems in Canada. Further longitudinal and/or intervention studies are needed to assess the potential of the identified factors to function as a management strategy to prevent or reduce FD in non-cage housed laying hens.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Feather damage (FD) resulting from feather pecking remains a concern in non-cage housing systems for laying hens worldwide. This study aimed to identify bird-, housing-, and management-related factors associated with FD in non-cage housing systems as the egg production sector phases out the conventional cage system in Canada. A survey on housing and management practices was developed and distributed to 122 laying hen farms where 39 respondents provided information on non-cage flocks. Farmers visually assessed 50 birds throughout the barn for FD using a 0-2 scoring scale according to severity. Prevalence of FD was calculated as the percentage of birds with any form of FD (score > 0). Multivariable linear regression modeling was used to identify factors associated with FD prevalence.
RESULTS RESULTS
Six variables were included in the final model and accounted for 64% of the variation in FD between farms. FD prevalence was higher with increasing flock age (0.9% ± 0.29) and when birds were housed in all wire/slatted barns compared with all litter barns (37.6% ± 13.1). Additionally, FD prevalence tended to be higher in barns with manure removal only after depopulation (20.1% ± 10.70). Enrichment also tended to be associated with higher FD (19.1% ± 8.04), possibly indicating that it was provided after FD was observed as a control measure, or, was not efficient in reducing the development of FD.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
These findings emphasize the role of litter provision and management (e.g., manure removal effects on air quality), and its potential impact on FD among laying hens in non-cage housing systems in Canada. Further longitudinal and/or intervention studies are needed to assess the potential of the identified factors to function as a management strategy to prevent or reduce FD in non-cage housed laying hens.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31796015
doi: 10.1186/s12917-019-2168-2
pii: 10.1186/s12917-019-2168-2
pmc: PMC6892204
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

435

Subventions

Organisme : Egg Farmers of Canada
ID : 052917
Organisme : Mitacs
ID : Elevate (460687)

Références

Br Poult Sci. 2010 Dec;51(6):725-33
pubmed: 21161778
Avian Dis. 1966 May;10(2):177-88
pubmed: 5963856
Br Poult Sci. 1999 Sep;40(4):444-51
pubmed: 10579400
Br Poult Sci. 1999 Mar;40(1):12-8
pubmed: 10405030
Poult Sci. 2015 Sep;94(9):2008-17
pubmed: 26188031
Poult Sci. 2011 May;90(5):1088-95
pubmed: 21489959
Avian Dis. 1966 May;10(2):216-24
pubmed: 5963859
Br Poult Sci. 2002 Jul;43(3):337-43
pubmed: 12195792
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 14;11(4):e0153477
pubmed: 27078835
Animals (Basel). 2019 Mar 31;9(4):
pubmed: 30935154
Vet Rec. 2013 Apr 20;172(16):423
pubmed: 23603726
Br Poult Sci. 2010 Aug;51(4):488-99
pubmed: 20924842
Animals (Basel). 2017 Dec 12;7(12):
pubmed: 29231892
Animals (Basel). 2019 Jul 10;9(7):
pubmed: 31295882
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 06;9(6):e90577
pubmed: 24603500
Poult Sci. 2015 Mar;94(3):518-33
pubmed: 25737567
Vet Clin North Am Exot Anim Pract. 2014 Jan;17(1):77-101
pubmed: 24274924
J Occup Environ Med. 2000 Mar;42(3):260-9
pubmed: 10738705
Vet Rec. 2000 Aug 26;147(9):233-8
pubmed: 11014485
Animals (Basel). 2018 Jul 11;8(7):
pubmed: 29997334
Animals (Basel). 2015 Sep 03;5(3):886-96
pubmed: 26479391
Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2000 Jun 1;68(3):215-229
pubmed: 10804267
Animal. 2018 Mar;12(3):585-596
pubmed: 28780926
Poult Sci. 2011 Jan;90(1):278-94
pubmed: 21177469
Can Vet J. 1978 Jul;19(7):187-93
pubmed: 359119
Front Vet Sci. 2016 Jul 22;3:57
pubmed: 27500137
Anim Behav. 1998 Apr;55(4):861-73
pubmed: 9632473
Anim Behav. 2000 Aug;60(2):211-216
pubmed: 10973723
Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2001 Jul 28;73(2):141-155
pubmed: 11358611

Auteurs

Caitlin Decina (C)

Department of Population Medicine, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road E, Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1, Canada.

Olaf Berke (O)

Department of Population Medicine, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road E, Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1, Canada.

Nienke van Staaveren (N)

Department of Animal Biosciences, Ontario Agricultural College, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road E, Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1, Canada.

Christine F Baes (CF)

Department of Animal Biosciences, Ontario Agricultural College, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road E, Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1, Canada.

Tina M Widowski (TM)

Department of Animal Biosciences, Ontario Agricultural College, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road E, Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1, Canada.

Alexandra Harlander-Matauschek (A)

Department of Animal Biosciences, Ontario Agricultural College, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road E, Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1, Canada. aharland@uoguelph.ca.

Articles similaires

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male
Humans Meals Time Factors Female Adult

Classifications MeSH