Preliminary Results Supporting the Bacterial Hypothesis in Red Breast Syndrome following Postmastectomy Acellular Dermal Matrix- and Implant-Based Reconstructions.
Acellular Dermis
/ adverse effects
Adult
Biofilms
Breast Implantation
/ adverse effects
Breast Implants
/ adverse effects
Breast Neoplasms
/ surgery
Erythema
/ microbiology
Female
Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections
/ diagnosis
Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections
/ diagnosis
Humans
Mastectomy
/ methods
Microscopy, Electron, Scanning
Middle Aged
Prosthesis-Related Infections
/ microbiology
Journal
Plastic and reconstructive surgery
ISSN: 1529-4242
Titre abrégé: Plast Reconstr Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 1306050
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 2019
12 2019
Historique:
entrez:
26
11
2019
pubmed:
26
11
2019
medline:
3
3
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Acellular dermal matrices have become a mandatory tool in reconstructive breast surgery. Since their introduction, they have been considered to be nonreactive and nonimmunogenic scaffolds. However, some patients who undergo implant-based breast reconstruction with acellular dermal matrices develop postoperative cutaneous erythema overlying their matrices, a condition commonly referred to as red breast syndrome. The aim of this study was to gain a better understanding of this phenomenon. An analysis was conducted on consecutive patients who underwent acellular dermal matrix- and implant-based breast reconstructions and developed red breast syndrome that was treated surgically between April of 2017 and June of 2018 at the authors' institution. During surgery, 1-cm specimens of acellular dermal matrix were sampled and analyzed by scanning electron microscopy. Observations were charted to score and record the presence and thickness of biofilm, and for identification of bacteria. These measurements were performed using Adobe Photoshop CS6 Extended software. Six postmastectomy breast reconstruction patients were included, all with AlloDerm Ready-to-Use-based reconstructions. All specimens were colonized by various bacteria ranging from Gram-negative bacilli to Gram-positive microorganisms. Biofilm was present in all studied specimens. The cause of skin erythema overlying acellular dermal matrix grafts, and the so-called red breast syndrome, may be related to contamination with various bacteria. Although contamination was omnipresent in analyzed samples, its clinical significance is variable. Even if acellular dermal matrix-based reconstructions are salvaged, this could come at the price of chronic local inflammation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31764635
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006227
pii: 00006534-201912000-00010
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
988e-992eCommentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Références
Pittman TA, Fan KL, Knapp A, Frantz S, Spear SL. Comparison of different acellular dermal matrices in breast reconstruction: The 50/50 study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;139:521–528.
Zenn M, Venturi M, Pittman T, et al. Optimizing outcomes of postmastectomy breast reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix: A review of recent clinical data. Eplasty 2017;17:e18.
Kim JY, Davila AA, Persing S, et al. A meta-analysis of human acellular dermis and submuscular tissue expander breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129:28–41.
Hunsicker LM, Ashikari AY, Berry C, Koch RM, Salzberg CA. Short-term complications associated with acellular dermal matrix-assisted direct-to-implant breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2017;78:35–40.
Cheng A, Saint-Cyr M. Comparison of different ADM materials in breast surgery. Clin Plast Surg. 2012;39:167–175.
Chun YS, Verma K, Rosen H, et al. Implant-based breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix and the risk of postoperative complications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125:429–436.
Antony AK, McCarthy CM, Cordeiro PG, et al. Acellular human dermis implantation in 153 immediate two-stage tissue expander breast reconstructions: Determining the incidence and significant predictors of complications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125:1606–1614.
Weichman KE, Wilson SC, Weinstein AL, et al. The use of acellular dermal matrix in immediate two-stage tissue expander breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129:1049–1058.
Sbitany H, Serletti JM. Acellular dermis-assisted prosthetic breast reconstruction: A systematic and critical review of efficacy and associated morbidity. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128:1162–1169.
Liu AS, Kao HK, Reish RG, Hergrueter CA, May JW Jr, Guo L. Postoperative complications in prosthesis-based breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127:1755–1762.
Gamboa-Bobadilla GM. Implant breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix. Ann Plast Surg. 2006;56:22–25.
Lanier ST, Wang ED, Chen JJ, et al. The effect of acellular dermal matrix use on complication rates in tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2010;64:674–678.
Ganske I, Hoyler M, Fox SE, Morris DJ, Lin SJ, Slavin SA. Delayed hypersensitivity reaction to acellular dermal matrix in breast reconstruction: The red breast syndrome? Ann Plast Surg. 2014;73(Suppl 2):S139–S143.
Nahabedian MY. Discussion: The use of acellular dermal matrices in two-stage expander/implant reconstruction: A multicenter, blinded, randomized controlled trial. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130(Suppl 2):67S–69S.
Newman MI, Hanabergh E, Samson MC. AlloDerm performance in the setting of prosthetic breast surgery, infection, and irradiation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126:1120; author reply 11201121.
Cicilioni OJ Jr, Foles VB, Sieger B, Musselman K. Mycobacterium fortuitum infection following reconstructive breast surgery: Differentiation from classically described red breast syndrome. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2013;1:e50.
Wu PS, Winocour S, Jacobson SR. Red breast syndrome: A review of available literature. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2015;39:227–230.
Lewis P, Jewell J, Mattison G, Gupta S, Kim H. Reducing postoperative infections and red breast syndrome in patients with acellular dermal matrix-based breast reconstruction: The relative roles of product sterility and lower body mass index. Ann Plast Surg. 2015;74(Suppl 1):S30–S32.
Nahabedian MY. AlloDerm performance in the setting of prosthetic breast surgery, infection, and irradiation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:1743–1753.
Kim JY, Connor CM. Focus on technique: Two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130(Suppl 2):104S–115S.
Ortiz JA. Clinical outcomes in breast reconstruction patients using a sterile acellular dermal matrix allograft. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2017;41:542–550.
Glasberg SB, Light D. AlloDerm and Strattice in breast reconstruction: A comparison and techniques for optimizing outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129:1223–1233.
Hill JL, Wong L, Kemper P, Buseman J, Davenport DL, Vasconez HC. Infectious complications associated with the use of acellular dermal matrix in implant-based bilateral breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2012;68:432–434.
Nyame TT, Lemon KP, Kolter R, Liao EC. High-throughput assay for bacterial adhesion on acellular dermal matrices and synthetic surgical materials. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128:1061–1068.
Danino MA, Efanov JI, Dimitropoulos G, et al. Capsular biofilm formation at the interface of textured expanders and human acellular dermal matrix: A comparative scanning electron microscopy study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;141:919–928.