Blue laser imaging and linked color imaging improve the color difference value and visibility of colorectal polyps in underwater conditions.
blue laser imaging
color difference
colorectal polyp
linked color imaging
underwater
Journal
Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society
ISSN: 1443-1661
Titre abrégé: Dig Endosc
Pays: Australia
ID NLM: 9101419
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2020
Jul 2020
Historique:
received:
05
08
2019
accepted:
19
11
2019
pubmed:
24
11
2019
medline:
29
7
2021
entrez:
24
11
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR) has become widespread for treating colorectal polyps. However, which observational mode is best suited for determining polyp margins underwater remains unclear. To determine the best mode, we analyzed three imaging modes: white light imaging (WLI), blue laser imaging (BLI) and linked color imaging (LCI). Images of consecutive colorectal polyps previously examined by these three modes before UEMR were analyzed according to the degree of underwater turbidity (transparent or cloudy). Color differences between the polyps and their surroundings were calculated using the Commission Internationale d'Eclairage Lab color space in which 3-D color parameters were expressed. Eight evaluators, who were blinded to the histology, scored the visibility from one (undetectable) to four (easily detectable) in both underwater conditions. The color differences and visibility scores were compared. Seventy-three polyps were evaluated. Sixty-one polyps (44 adenomatous, 17 serrated) were observed under transparent conditions, and 12 polyps (seven adenomatous, five serrated) were observed under cloudy conditions. Under transparent conditions, color differences for the BLI (8.5) and LCI (7.9) were significantly higher than that of WLI (5.7; P < 0.001). Visibility scores for BLI (3.6) and LCI (3.4) were also higher than that of WLI (3.1; P < 0.0001). Under cloudy conditions, visibility scores for LCI (2.9) and WLI (2.7) were significantly higher than that of BLI (2.2; P < 0.0001 and P = 0.04, respectively). BLI and LCI were better observational modes in transparent water; however, BLI was unsuitable for cloudy conditions.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND AND AIM
OBJECTIVE
Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR) has become widespread for treating colorectal polyps. However, which observational mode is best suited for determining polyp margins underwater remains unclear. To determine the best mode, we analyzed three imaging modes: white light imaging (WLI), blue laser imaging (BLI) and linked color imaging (LCI).
METHODS
METHODS
Images of consecutive colorectal polyps previously examined by these three modes before UEMR were analyzed according to the degree of underwater turbidity (transparent or cloudy). Color differences between the polyps and their surroundings were calculated using the Commission Internationale d'Eclairage Lab color space in which 3-D color parameters were expressed. Eight evaluators, who were blinded to the histology, scored the visibility from one (undetectable) to four (easily detectable) in both underwater conditions. The color differences and visibility scores were compared.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Seventy-three polyps were evaluated. Sixty-one polyps (44 adenomatous, 17 serrated) were observed under transparent conditions, and 12 polyps (seven adenomatous, five serrated) were observed under cloudy conditions. Under transparent conditions, color differences for the BLI (8.5) and LCI (7.9) were significantly higher than that of WLI (5.7; P < 0.001). Visibility scores for BLI (3.6) and LCI (3.4) were also higher than that of WLI (3.1; P < 0.0001). Under cloudy conditions, visibility scores for LCI (2.9) and WLI (2.7) were significantly higher than that of BLI (2.2; P < 0.0001 and P = 0.04, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
BLI and LCI were better observational modes in transparent water; however, BLI was unsuitable for cloudy conditions.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
791-800Subventions
Organisme : Fujifilm Corporation
Informations de copyright
© 2019 Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society.
Références
Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2018; 68: 394-424.
Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N. Engl. J. Med. 1993; 329: 1977-81.
Zauber AG, Winawer SJ, O’Brien MJ et al. Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012; 366: 687-96.
Løberg M, Kalager M, Holme Ø et al. Long-term colorectal-cancer mortality after adenoma removal. N. Engl. J. Med. 2014; 371: 799-807.
Ferlitsch M, Moss A, Hassan C et al. Colorectal polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR): European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline. Endoscopy 2017; 49: 270-97.
Tanaka S, Kashida H, Saito Y et al. JGES guidelines for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection/endoscopic mucosal resection. Dig. Endosc. 2015; 27: 417-34.
Kawamura T, Takeuchi Y, Asai S et al. A comparison of the resection rate for cold and hot snare polypectomy for 4-9 mm colorectal polyps: a multicentre randomised controlled trial (CRESCENT study). Gut 2018; 67: 1950-7.
Yamashina T, Uedo N, Akasaka T et al. Comparison of underwater vs conventional endoscopic mucosal resection of intermediate-size colorectal polyps. Gastroenterology 2019; 157: 451-61.e2
Schenck RJ, Jahann DA, Patrie JT et al. Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection is associated with fewer recurrences and earlier curative resections compared to conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for large colorectal polyps. Surg. Endosc. 2017; 31: 4174-83.
Spadaccini M, Fuccio L, Lamonaca L et al. Underwater EMR for colorectal lesions: a systematic review with meta-analysis (with video). Gastrointest. Endosc. 2019; 89: 1109-16.
Binmoeller KF, Weilert F, Shah J et al. "Underwater" EMR without submucosal injection for large sessile colorectal polyps (with video). Gastrointest. Endosc. 2012; 75: 1086-91.
Yamasaki Y, Uedo N, Takeuchi Y et al. Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for superficial nonampullary duodenal adenomas. Endoscopy 2018; 50: 154-8.
Kanzaki H, Takenaka R, Kawahara Y et al. Linked color imaging (LCI), a novel image-enhanced endoscopy technology, emphasizes the color of early gastric cancer. Endosc. Int. Open. 2017; 5: E1005-13.
Suzuki T, Hara T, Kitagawa Y et al. Linked-color imaging improves endoscopic visibility of colorectal nongranular flat lesions. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2017; 86: 692-7.
Dohi O, Yagi N, Naito Y et al. Blue laser imaging-bright improves the real-time detection rate of early gastric cancer: a randomized controlled study. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2019; 89: 47-57.
Yoshida N, Naito Y, Yasuda R et al. Linked color imaging improves the visibility of various featured colorectal polyps in an endoscopist’s visibility and color difference value. Int. J. Colorectal. Dis. 2017; 32: 1253-60.
Fujimoto D, Muguruma N, Okamoto K et al. Linked color imaging enhances endoscopic detection of sessile serrated adenoma/polyps. Endosc. Int. Open. 2018; 6: E322-34.
Kuehni RG. Color-tolerance data and the tentative CIE 1976 L*a*b* formula. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 1976; 66 (5): 497-500.
Sato Y, Sagawa T, Hirakawa M et al. Clinical utility of capsule endoscopy with flexible spectral imaging color enhancement for diagnosis of small bowel lesions. Endosc. Int. Open 2014; 2: E80-7.
Bosman FT, Carneiro F, Hruban RH, Theise ND, eds. WHO Classification of Tumours of the Digestive System, 4th edn. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), 2010.
Ikematsu H, Sakamoto T, Togashi K et al. Detectability of colorectal neoplastic lesions using a novel endoscopic system with blue laser imaging: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2017; 86: 386-94.
Shimoda R, Sakata Y, Fujise T et al. The adenoma miss rate of blue-laser imaging vs. white-light imaging during colonoscopy: a randomized tandem trial. Endoscopy 2017; 49 (2): 186-90.
Yoshida N, Naito Y, Murakami T et al. Linked color imaging improves the visibility of colorectal polyps: a video study. Endosc. Int. Open 2017; 5: E518-25.
Fukuda H, Miura Y, Osawa H et al. Linked color imaging can enhance recognition of early gastric cancer by high color contrast to surrounding gastric intestinal metaplasia. J. Gastroenterol. 2019; 54: 396-406.