Exploring characteristics and risk of repetition in people who fail to report previous hospital presentations for self-harm: A case-control study using data from The Manchester Self-Harm Project.


Journal

Journal of affective disorders
ISSN: 1573-2517
Titre abrégé: J Affect Disord
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 7906073

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 02 2020
Historique:
received: 15 05 2019
revised: 11 09 2019
accepted: 28 10 2019
pubmed: 12 11 2019
medline: 26 1 2021
entrez: 12 11 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

As a risk factor for future self-harm and suicide, questions about past self-harm are typically included in assessments that help inform management of people who self-harm. However, little is known about people with a history of self-harm who do not report it. This study aimed to describe and compare (i) characteristics of people who did or did not accurately report previous self-harm, and (ii) 12-month repetition of self-harm. Data on all self-harm presentations to three hospital emergency departments in England were collected from 2003 to 2015. A 1:5 matched case-control design included 374 cases where previous self-harm was not reported and 1,870 controls where previous self-harm was reported. Data were analysed using conditional logistic regression and survival analysis. Cases were more likely to be male (OR 1.42; 95% CI 1.13-1.77), middle-aged (OR 1.41; 95% CI 1.08-1.83), employed (OR 1.51; 95% CI 1.15-1.98), and less likely be referred to psychiatric services (OR 0.53; 95% CI 0.35-0.80). Twelve-month repetition was similar in cases and controls (30% vs 31%). Self-harm not resulting in a hospital presentation could not be verified and individuals with a single episode in the study database were therefore excluded. Previous self-harm is an important risk factor for repetition in people who accurately recall and report it and those who fail to report it. Those who do not report previous self-harm are less likely to be referred to psychiatric services, emphasising the need for careful assessment of every self-harm presentation to emergency departments.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
As a risk factor for future self-harm and suicide, questions about past self-harm are typically included in assessments that help inform management of people who self-harm. However, little is known about people with a history of self-harm who do not report it. This study aimed to describe and compare (i) characteristics of people who did or did not accurately report previous self-harm, and (ii) 12-month repetition of self-harm.
METHODS
Data on all self-harm presentations to three hospital emergency departments in England were collected from 2003 to 2015. A 1:5 matched case-control design included 374 cases where previous self-harm was not reported and 1,870 controls where previous self-harm was reported. Data were analysed using conditional logistic regression and survival analysis.
RESULTS
Cases were more likely to be male (OR 1.42; 95% CI 1.13-1.77), middle-aged (OR 1.41; 95% CI 1.08-1.83), employed (OR 1.51; 95% CI 1.15-1.98), and less likely be referred to psychiatric services (OR 0.53; 95% CI 0.35-0.80). Twelve-month repetition was similar in cases and controls (30% vs 31%).
LIMITATIONS
Self-harm not resulting in a hospital presentation could not be verified and individuals with a single episode in the study database were therefore excluded.
CONCLUSIONS
Previous self-harm is an important risk factor for repetition in people who accurately recall and report it and those who fail to report it. Those who do not report previous self-harm are less likely to be referred to psychiatric services, emphasising the need for careful assessment of every self-harm presentation to emergency departments.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31710932
pii: S0165-0327(19)31253-4
doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.10.052
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

77-82

Subventions

Organisme : Department of Health
Pays : United Kingdom

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Auteurs

Caroline Clements (C)

Centre for Mental Health and Safety, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, UK. Electronic address: Caroline.V.Clements@manchester.ac.uk.

Bushra Farooq (B)

Centre for Mental Health and Safety, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, UK.

Harriet Bickley (H)

Centre for Mental Health and Safety, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, UK.

Nav Kapur (N)

Centre for Mental Health and Safety, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, UK; Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH