Evidence of niche differentiation for two sympatric vulture species in the Southeastern United States.

Carrion Competition Landfills Resource selection Roost habitat Savannah River site

Journal

Movement ecology
ISSN: 2051-3933
Titre abrégé: Mov Ecol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101635009

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2019
Historique:
received: 26 04 2019
accepted: 14 10 2019
entrez: 8 11 2019
pubmed: 7 11 2019
medline: 7 11 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

As obligate scavengers utilizing similar habitats, interspecific competition undoubtedly occurs between resident black ( Using fine-scale movement data, we assessed interspecific seasonal differences in monthly roost reuse frequency and roost site fidelity, as well as monthly flight, roost, and diurnal rest site resource selection based on > 2.8 million locations of 9 black vultures and 9 turkey vultures tracked from September 2013 to August 2015 using Groupe Spécial Mobile/Global Positioning System (GSM/GPS) transmitters. Black vultures generally exhibited greater roost fidelity as well as a greater maximum number of nights spent at a single roost than turkey vultures. Patterns of flight, roost, and resting habitat selection within the home range varied monthly as well as between species, providing evidence for habitat segregation and niche differentiation by sympatric vultures. In particular, our results indicate the importance of wooded wetlands for resting and roosting locations for both species, and revealed clear differences in the use of forested habitats between species during flight, resting, and roosting behavioral states. By examining differences in resource selection and spatial ecology of black and turkey vultures across a range of behaviors, this study demonstrates mechanisms of niche differentiation in these ecologically similar species, and enhances potential for conservation and informed management of this important group of birds.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
As obligate scavengers utilizing similar habitats, interspecific competition undoubtedly occurs between resident black (
METHODS METHODS
Using fine-scale movement data, we assessed interspecific seasonal differences in monthly roost reuse frequency and roost site fidelity, as well as monthly flight, roost, and diurnal rest site resource selection based on > 2.8 million locations of 9 black vultures and 9 turkey vultures tracked from September 2013 to August 2015 using Groupe Spécial Mobile/Global Positioning System (GSM/GPS) transmitters.
RESULTS RESULTS
Black vultures generally exhibited greater roost fidelity as well as a greater maximum number of nights spent at a single roost than turkey vultures. Patterns of flight, roost, and resting habitat selection within the home range varied monthly as well as between species, providing evidence for habitat segregation and niche differentiation by sympatric vultures. In particular, our results indicate the importance of wooded wetlands for resting and roosting locations for both species, and revealed clear differences in the use of forested habitats between species during flight, resting, and roosting behavioral states.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
By examining differences in resource selection and spatial ecology of black and turkey vultures across a range of behaviors, this study demonstrates mechanisms of niche differentiation in these ecologically similar species, and enhances potential for conservation and informed management of this important group of birds.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31695917
doi: 10.1186/s40462-019-0179-z
pii: 179
pmc: PMC6822427
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

31

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s). 2019.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interestsThe authors declare that they have no competing interests exist.

Références

Ecology. 2017 Sep;98(9):2413-2424
pubmed: 28628191
Sci Rep. 2017 Dec 12;7(1):17408
pubmed: 29234134
Sci Rep. 2018 Nov 5;8(1):16331
pubmed: 30397216
Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 31;7(1):10250
pubmed: 28860543
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 5;12(7):e0179819
pubmed: 28678813
Sci Rep. 2016 Oct 25;6:35746
pubmed: 27779179
Mov Ecol. 2018 Sep 4;6:13
pubmed: 30202527
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2014 Apr 14;369(1643):20130195
pubmed: 24733950
Can J Zool. 1980 Jun;58(6):1075-89
pubmed: 7427802
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 11;9(2):e88430
pubmed: 24523893

Auteurs

Amanda E Holland (AE)

1Warnell School of Forestry & Natural Resources, University of Georgia, Athens, GA USA.
2Savannah River Ecology Laboratory, University of Georgia, Aiken, SC USA.

Michael E Byrne (ME)

2Savannah River Ecology Laboratory, University of Georgia, Aiken, SC USA.
3Present address: School of Natural Resources, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO USA.

Jeffrey Hepinstall-Cymerman (J)

1Warnell School of Forestry & Natural Resources, University of Georgia, Athens, GA USA.

A Lawrence Bryan (AL)

2Savannah River Ecology Laboratory, University of Georgia, Aiken, SC USA.

Travis L DeVault (TL)

USDA/APHIS/WS National Wildlife Research Center, Sandusky, OH USA.

Olin E Rhodes (OE)

2Savannah River Ecology Laboratory, University of Georgia, Aiken, SC USA.
5Odum School of Ecology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA USA.

James C Beasley (JC)

1Warnell School of Forestry & Natural Resources, University of Georgia, Athens, GA USA.
2Savannah River Ecology Laboratory, University of Georgia, Aiken, SC USA.

Classifications MeSH