Therapy Line and Associated Predictors of Response to PD-1/PD-L1-Inhibitor Monotherapy in Advanced Non-small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Bi-centric Cohort Study.
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
/ therapeutic use
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological
/ therapeutic use
B7-H1 Antigen
/ antagonists & inhibitors
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
/ drug therapy
Cohort Studies
Female
Humans
Lung Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Male
Middle Aged
Nivolumab
/ therapeutic use
Predictive Value of Tests
Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor
/ antagonists & inhibitors
Progression-Free Survival
Retrospective Studies
Survival Rate
Treatment Outcome
Journal
Targeted oncology
ISSN: 1776-260X
Titre abrégé: Target Oncol
Pays: France
ID NLM: 101270595
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 2019
12 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
28
10
2019
medline:
23
7
2020
entrez:
27
10
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Evidence on PD-1/PD-L1-directed immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is mainly based on clinical trials in first- or second-line settings. We aimed to investigate response and prognostic factors with special regard to third- or later-line therapy. We retrospectively analyzed all patients who had received ICI monotherapy with nivolumab, pembrolizumab, or atezolizumab for advanced NSCLC. Computed tomography evaluations were analyzed using response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST, version 1.1). Kaplan-Meier analyses were conducted to calculate progression-free (PFS) and overall (OS) survival; the impact of influencing variables was evaluated using uni- and multivariate Cox-regression analyses. Among 153 patients (59% men, mean age 66 years), median PFS was 4 months [mo; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 3-5], OS was 13 mo (10-17), and objective response rate (ORR) was 22%. Therapy line ≥ 3 was associated with significantly inferior PFS (p = 0.003) and OS (p = 0.001). In first-line therapy PFS, OS, and ORR were 7 mo (3-11), 17 mo [9-not evaluable (n.e.)], and 36%; in second-line 4 mo (3-7), 18 mo (13-n.e.) and 19%, and in ≥ third-line 2 mo (1-3), 9 mo (4-12), and 13%. PFS was significantly influenced by PD-L1 expression in first-line therapy (p = 0.006). In ≥ third-line patients, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status significantly affected PFS and OS (both p < 0.001). Third- or later-line single-agent anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy is less efficacious as compared to first- and second-line treatment. In that setting, ECOG performance status predominates known predictors like PD-L1 expression or presence of an alteration in EGFR or ALK.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Evidence on PD-1/PD-L1-directed immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is mainly based on clinical trials in first- or second-line settings.
OBJECTIVE
We aimed to investigate response and prognostic factors with special regard to third- or later-line therapy.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
We retrospectively analyzed all patients who had received ICI monotherapy with nivolumab, pembrolizumab, or atezolizumab for advanced NSCLC. Computed tomography evaluations were analyzed using response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST, version 1.1). Kaplan-Meier analyses were conducted to calculate progression-free (PFS) and overall (OS) survival; the impact of influencing variables was evaluated using uni- and multivariate Cox-regression analyses.
RESULTS
Among 153 patients (59% men, mean age 66 years), median PFS was 4 months [mo; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 3-5], OS was 13 mo (10-17), and objective response rate (ORR) was 22%. Therapy line ≥ 3 was associated with significantly inferior PFS (p = 0.003) and OS (p = 0.001). In first-line therapy PFS, OS, and ORR were 7 mo (3-11), 17 mo [9-not evaluable (n.e.)], and 36%; in second-line 4 mo (3-7), 18 mo (13-n.e.) and 19%, and in ≥ third-line 2 mo (1-3), 9 mo (4-12), and 13%. PFS was significantly influenced by PD-L1 expression in first-line therapy (p = 0.006). In ≥ third-line patients, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status significantly affected PFS and OS (both p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
Third- or later-line single-agent anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy is less efficacious as compared to first- and second-line treatment. In that setting, ECOG performance status predominates known predictors like PD-L1 expression or presence of an alteration in EGFR or ALK.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31654203
doi: 10.1007/s11523-019-00679-9
pii: 10.1007/s11523-019-00679-9
pmc: PMC6875512
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
0
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological
0
B7-H1 Antigen
0
CD274 protein, human
0
PDCD1 protein, human
0
Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor
0
Nivolumab
31YO63LBSN
atezolizumab
52CMI0WC3Y
pembrolizumab
DPT0O3T46P
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
707-717Références
Eur J Cancer. 2009 Jan;45(2):228-47
pubmed: 19097774
J Thorac Oncol. 2017 Jul;12(7):1109-1121
pubmed: 28461257
Lancet. 2016 Apr 9;387(10027):1540-1550
pubmed: 26712084
N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 22;379(21):2040-2051
pubmed: 30280635
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Aug 20;35(24):2781-2789
pubmed: 28609226
Eur J Cancer. 2019 Jan;106:144-159
pubmed: 30528799
Lancet. 2017 Jan 21;389(10066):255-265
pubmed: 27979383
N Engl J Med. 2015 May 21;372(21):2018-28
pubmed: 25891174
N Engl J Med. 2015 Oct 22;373(17):1627-39
pubmed: 26412456
N Engl J Med. 2018 May 31;378(22):2093-2104
pubmed: 29658845
Ann Oncol. 2018 Oct 1;29(Suppl 4):iv192-iv237
pubmed: 30285222
Lancet. 2016 Apr 30;387(10030):1837-46
pubmed: 26970723
N Engl J Med. 2018 May 31;378(22):2078-2092
pubmed: 29658856
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jul 9;373(2):123-35
pubmed: 26028407
JAMA Oncol. 2018 Feb 1;4(2):210-216
pubmed: 29270615
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Mar;16(3):257-65
pubmed: 25704439
N Engl J Med. 2018 Jun 14;378(24):2288-2301
pubmed: 29863955
N Engl J Med. 2005 Jul 14;353(2):123-32
pubmed: 16014882
N Engl J Med. 2016 Nov 10;375(19):1823-1833
pubmed: 27718847
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Apr;19(4):521-536
pubmed: 29545095
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Jun 20;33(18):2004-12
pubmed: 25897158
J Cancer. 2018 Apr 19;9(10):1813-1820
pubmed: 29805708